Re: [HACKERS] non-blocking CREATE INDEX in 8.2??

2007-07-14 Thread Guillaume Lelarge

Jim C. Nasby a écrit :

On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:45:18PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

Jim C. Nasby wrote:

According to http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Feature_Matrix,
8.2 has non-blocking CREATE INDEX, which is news to me. Is it correct?

CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY


Well, I guess it's a good thing someone created that cheat-sheet, 'cause
I can't keep which feature went into what version straight anymore. :)


+1

I will try to add on my todo list to proofread and enhance this. Thanks 
for this page, Stefan.


Regards.


--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://docs.postgresqlfr.org

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
  subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [HACKERS] non-blocking CREATE INDEX in 8.2??

2007-07-14 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:45:18PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>>> According to http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Feature_Matrix,
>>> 8.2 has non-blocking CREATE INDEX, which is news to me. Is it correct?
>> CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY
> 
> Well, I guess it's a good thing someone created that cheat-sheet, 'cause
> I can't keep which feature went into what version straight anymore. :)

glad that you like it :-) - but keep in mind that it clearly states that
this is page is still very much an experiment.
There is a lot of stuff still missing and it might as well contain a
number of inaccuracies too - so take everything there with a grain of
salt ...


Stefan

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] non-blocking CREATE INDEX in 8.2??

2007-07-13 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:45:18PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >According to http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Feature_Matrix,
> >8.2 has non-blocking CREATE INDEX, which is news to me. Is it correct?
> 
> CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY

Well, I guess it's a good thing someone created that cheat-sheet, 'cause
I can't keep which feature went into what version straight anymore. :)
-- 
Jim Nasby  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EnterpriseDB  http://enterprisedb.com  512.569.9461 (cell)


pgpOpzG4z9Zs9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [HACKERS] non-blocking CREATE INDEX in 8.2??

2007-07-13 Thread Neil Conway
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 15:38 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> According to http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Feature_Matrix,
> 8.2 has non-blocking CREATE INDEX, which is news to me. Is it correct?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-createindex.html

See the CONCURRENTLY clause.

-Neil



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


Re: [HACKERS] non-blocking CREATE INDEX in 8.2??

2007-07-13 Thread Joshua D. Drake

Jim C. Nasby wrote:

According to http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Feature_Matrix,
8.2 has non-blocking CREATE INDEX, which is news to me. Is it correct?


CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY

:)

Joshua D. Drake



http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Feature_Matrix&oldid=1734
is the version where that was added (very early in the history of the
page).



--

  === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
 http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


[HACKERS] non-blocking CREATE INDEX in 8.2??

2007-07-13 Thread Jim C. Nasby
According to http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Feature_Matrix,
8.2 has non-blocking CREATE INDEX, which is news to me. Is it correct?

http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Feature_Matrix&oldid=1734
is the version where that was added (very early in the history of the
page).
-- 
Jim Nasby  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EnterpriseDB  http://enterprisedb.com  512.569.9461 (cell)


pgpbHQz24XMTQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature