Re: [HACKERS] osprey buildfarm member has been failing for a long while

2006-05-29 Thread Rémi Zara
Le 28 mai 06 à 17:42, Tom Lane a écrit : =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Perhaps the swap space or ulimit setting on the box needs to be raised? What kind of ulimit did you think of ? I'll try upping the data segment size. Yeah, data segment size

Re: [HACKERS] osprey buildfarm member has been failing for a long while

2006-05-28 Thread Rémi Zara
Le 28 mai 06 à 04:08, Andrew Dunstan a écrit : Tom Lane wrote: osprey hasn't been able to build HEAD since the GIN code was added. I'm not sure that GIN is really to blame though, as the error looks like an out-of-memory problem while trying to link the backend: ccache gcc -O2 -Wall

Re: [HACKERS] osprey buildfarm member has been failing for a long while

2006-05-28 Thread Tom Lane
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Perhaps the swap space or ulimit setting on the box needs to be raised? What kind of ulimit did you think of ? I'll try upping the data segment size. Yeah, data segment size would be the most likely culprit if this is a

[HACKERS] osprey buildfarm member has been failing for a long while

2006-05-27 Thread Tom Lane
osprey hasn't been able to build HEAD since the GIN code was added. I'm not sure that GIN is really to blame though, as the error looks like an out-of-memory problem while trying to link the backend: ccache gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wendif-labels

Re: [HACKERS] osprey buildfarm member has been failing for a long while

2006-05-27 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: osprey hasn't been able to build HEAD since the GIN code was added. I'm not sure that GIN is really to blame though, as the error looks like an out-of-memory problem while trying to link the backend: ccache gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline