Re: [HACKERS] parallel.sgml

2016-10-13 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
>> Can someone, possibly a native English speaker, please confirm this is >> typo or not? I cannot parse the sentence as it is, but this maybe >> because I'm not a English speaker. > > Yes, I think removing "between" is correct. Thanks for the confirmation. Fix pushed to master and 9.6 stable.

Re: [HACKERS] parallel.sgml

2016-10-13 Thread Tom Lane
Tatsuo Ishii writes: >> While reading parallel.sgml, I met with following sentence. >> >> If this occurs, the leader will execute the portion of the plan >> between below the Gather node entirely by itself, >> almost as if the Gather node were not present. >> >> Maybe "the

Re: [HACKERS] parallel.sgml

2016-10-12 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >>> While reading parallel.sgml, I met with following sentence. >>> >>> If this occurs, the leader will execute the portion of the plan >>> between below the Gather node entirely by itself, >>> almost as if

Re: [HACKERS] parallel.sgml

2016-10-12 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> While reading parallel.sgml, I met with following sentence. >> >> If this occurs, the leader will execute the portion of the plan >> between below the Gather node entirely by itself, >> almost as if the

Re: [HACKERS] parallel.sgml

2016-10-12 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> While reading parallel.sgml, I met with following sentence. > > If this occurs, the leader will execute the portion of the plan > between below the Gather node entirely by itself, > almost as if the Gather node were not present. > > Maybe "the portion of the plan between below"

[HACKERS] parallel.sgml

2016-10-10 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
While reading parallel.sgml, I met with following sentence. If this occurs, the leader will execute the portion of the plan between below the Gather node entirely by itself, almost as if the Gather node were not present. Maybe "the portion of the plan between below" shoud have been