Re: [HACKERS] patch: CHECK FUNCTION statement

2011-11-14 Thread Thom Brown
On 14 November 2011 20:54, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hello > > 2011/11/14 Thom Brown : >> On 6 October 2011 12:52, Pavel Stehule wrote: >>> >>> Hello >>> >>> I am sending a version with regress tests and basic documentation >> >> Hi Pavel, >> >> I think this sentence needs rewriting: >> >> "checkfun

Re: [HACKERS] patch: CHECK FUNCTION statement

2011-11-14 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello 2011/11/14 Thom Brown : > On 6 October 2011 12:52, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> I am sending a version with regress tests and basic documentation > > Hi Pavel, > > I think this sentence needs rewriting: > > "checkfunction is the name of a previously registered function that > will

Re: [HACKERS] patch: CHECK FUNCTION statement

2011-11-14 Thread Thom Brown
On 6 October 2011 12:52, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > Hello > > I am sending a version with regress tests and basic documentation Hi Pavel, I think this sentence needs rewriting: "checkfunction is the name of a previously registered function that will be called when a new function in the language i