On 4.4.2012 05:35, Greg Smith wrote:
On 03/05/2012 05:20 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
What is the current state of this effort? Is there someone else working
on that? If not, I propose this (for starters):
* add a new page Performance results to the menu, with a list of
members that
On 03/05/2012 05:20 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
What is the current state of this effort? Is there someone else working
on that? If not, I propose this (for starters):
* add a new page Performance results to the menu, with a list of
members that uploaded the perfomance-results
* for
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
The idea is that buildfarm systems that are known to have a) reasonable
hardware and b) no other concurrent work going on could also do
performance tests. The main benefit of this approach is it avoids
duplicating all of the
On 12.5.2011 08:54, Greg Smith wrote:
Tomas Vondra wrote:
The idea is that buildfarm systems that are known to have a) reasonable
hardware and b) no other concurrent work going on could also do
performance tests. The main benefit of this approach is it avoids
duplicating all of the system
Dne 12.5.2011 08:54, Greg Smith napsal(a):
Tomas Vondra wrote:
Actually I was not aware of how the buildfarm works, all I
knew was there's something like that because some of the hackers mention
a failed build on the mailing list occasionally.
So I guess this is a good opportunity to
On 5/12/11 7:19 PM, Lou Picciano wrote:
Josh My Man! How are you?!!
Is this the one?: http://planetdrizzle.org/
Since that's their blog feed, here's some durable links:
Testing tool:
http://docs.drizzle.org/testing/dbqp.html
Random query generator:
https://launchpad.net/randgen
Tomas Vondra wrote:
Actually I was not aware of how the buildfarm works, all I
knew was there's something like that because some of the hackers mention
a failed build on the mailing list occasionally.
So I guess this is a good opportunity to investigate it a bit ;-)
Anyway I'm not sure this
* Josh Berkus (j...@agliodbs.com) wrote:
The first problem is plaform performance, which would be a matter of
expanding the buildfarm to include a small set of performance tests ...
probably ones based on previously known problems, plus some other simple
common operations. The goal here
Dne 12.5.2011 16:36, Tom Lane napsal(a):
* Josh Berkus (j...@agliodbs.com) wrote:
The first problem is plaform performance, which would be a matter of
expanding the buildfarm to include a small set of performance tests ...
probably ones based on previously known problems, plus some other
Dne 12.5.2011 08:54, Greg Smith napsal(a):
Tomas Vondra wrote:
Actually I was not aware of how the buildfarm works, all I
knew was there's something like that because some of the hackers mention
a failed build on the mailing list occasionally.
So I guess this is a good opportunity to
Tom Lane wrote:
There's no such thing as a useful performance test that runs quickly
enough to be sane to incorporate in our standard regression tests.
To throw a hard number out: I can get a moderately useful performance
test on a SELECT-only workload from pgbench in about one minute.
All,
BTW, if we want a kind of performance unit test, Drizzle has a very
nice framework for this. And it's even already PostgreSQL-compatible.
I'm hunting for the link for it now ...
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Josh My Man! How are you?!!
Is this the one?: http://planetdrizzle.org/
Lou Picciano
- Original Message -
From: Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 8:11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] performance-test farm
All,
BTW
Hi everyone,
several members of this mailing list mentioned recently it'd be really
useful to have a performance-test farm, that it might improve the
development process and make some changes easier.
I've briefly discussed this with another CSPUG member, who represents a
local company using
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
1) Is there something that might serve as a model?
I've been assuming that we would use the PostgreSQL Buildfarm as a
model.
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/
2) How would you use it? What procedure would you expect?
People who had suitable test
Dne 11.5.2011 23:41, Kevin Grittner napsal(a):
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
1) Is there something that might serve as a model?
I've been assuming that we would use the PostgreSQL Buildfarm as a
model.
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/
Yes, I was thinking about that too, but
1)
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
Dne 11.5.2011 23:41, Kevin Grittner napsal(a):
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
1) Is there something that might serve as a model?
I've been assuming that we would use the PostgreSQL Buildfarm as
a model.
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/
Yes, I
Dne 12.5.2011 00:21, Kevin Grittner napsal(a):
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
Dne 11.5.2011 23:41, Kevin Grittner napsal(a):
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
1) Is there something that might serve as a model?
I've been assuming that we would use the PostgreSQL Buildfarm as
a model.
On 05/11/2011 06:21 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Tomas Vondrat...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
Dne 11.5.2011 23:41, Kevin Grittner napsal(a):
Tomas Vondrat...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
First up, you guys should be aware that Greg Smith at least is working
on this. Let's not duplicate effort.
1) Is there
* Andrew Dunstan (and...@dunslane.net) wrote:
First up, you guys should be aware that Greg Smith at least is
working on this. Let's not duplicate effort.
Indeed. I'm also interested in making this happen and have worked with
Greg in the past on it. There's even some code out there that we
Guys,
There are two mutually exclusive problems to solve with a
performance-test farm.
The first problem is plaform performance, which would be a matter of
expanding the buildfarm to include a small set of performance tests ...
probably ones based on previously known problems, plus some other
* Josh Berkus (j...@agliodbs.com) wrote:
The first problem is plaform performance, which would be a matter of
expanding the buildfarm to include a small set of performance tests ...
probably ones based on previously known problems, plus some other simple
common operations. The goal here would
22 matches
Mail list logo