On 09/06/14 18:31, Tom Lane wrote:
> Linos writes:
>> On 05/06/14 19:39, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'd like to see a self-contained test case, by which I mean full details
>>> about the table/view schemas; it's not clear whether the actual data
>>> is very important here.
>> query1 schema file:
>> http:
Linos writes:
> On 05/06/14 19:39, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd like to see a self-contained test case, by which I mean full details
>> about the table/view schemas; it's not clear whether the actual data
>> is very important here.
> query1 schema file:
> http://pastebin.com/JpqM87dr
Sorry about the d
On 09/06/14 17:30, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Linos wrote:
>> On 09/06/14 16:55, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Linos wrote:
Hello,
Is this information enough? I could try to assemble a complete test case
but I have ver
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Linos wrote:
> On 09/06/14 16:55, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Linos wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Is this information enough? I could try to assemble a complete test case
>>> but I have very little time right now because I am trying to me
On 09/06/14 16:55, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Linos wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is this information enough? I could try to assemble a complete test case but
>> I have very little time right now because I am trying to meet a very
>> difficult deadline.
>>
>> I will do ASAP
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Linos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is this information enough? I could try to assemble a complete test case but
> I have very little time right now because I am trying to meet a very
> difficult deadline.
>
> I will do ASAP if needed.
It is not -- it was enough to diagnos
On 05/06/14 23:09, Linos wrote:
> On 05/06/14 19:39, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Merlin Moncure writes:
>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Linos wrote:
What I don't understand is why the statistics have this bad information,
all my tests are done on a database just restored and analyzed. Can I
On 05/06/14 19:39, Tom Lane wrote:
> Merlin Moncure writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Linos wrote:
>>> What I don't understand is why the statistics have this bad information,
>>> all my tests are done on a database just restored and analyzed. Can I do
>>> something to improve the qual
Merlin Moncure writes:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Linos wrote:
>> What I don't understand is why the statistics have this bad information, all
>> my tests are done on a database just restored and analyzed. Can I do
>> something to improve the quality of my database statistics and let the
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Linos wrote:
> What I don't understand is why the statistics have this bad information, all
> my tests are done on a database just restored and analyzed. Can I do
> something to improve the quality of my database statistics and let the
> planner do better choices
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Linos wrote:
> What I don't understand is why the statistics have this bad information, all
> my tests are done on a database just restored and analyzed. Can I do
> something to improve the quality of my database statistics and let the
> planner do better choices
On 05/06/14 16:40, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Linos wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> This is a continuation of the thread found here:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/538f2578.9080...@linos.es
>>
>> Considering this seems to be a problem with the planner I thought tha
On 05/06/14 16:40, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Linos wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> This is a continuation of the thread found here:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/538f2578.9080...@linos.es
>>
>> Considering this seems to be a problem with the planner I thought tha
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Linos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is a continuation of the thread found here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/538f2578.9080...@linos.es
>
> Considering this seems to be a problem with the planner I thought that maybe
> would be a better idea to post this pr
On 05/06/14 13:32, Linos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is a continuation of the thread found here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/538f2578.9080...@linos.es
>
> Considering this seems to be a problem with the planner I thought that maybe
> would be a better idea to post this problem here.
>
Hello all,
This is a continuation of the thread found here:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/538f2578.9080...@linos.es
Considering this seems to be a problem with the planner I thought that maybe
would be a better idea to post this problem here.
To summarize the original thread I upgraded a
16 matches
Mail list logo
