[HACKERS] pg_class(relpersistence) of hash index

2014-11-24 Thread Antonin Houska
While checking how BM_PERMANENT flag is set (in buffer header), I noticed that
hash index has it set too. Shouldn't pg_class(relpersistence) be 'u' in this
case? Currently it's set to 'p':

postgres=# CREATE TABLE a(i int);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# CREATE INDEX ON a USING HASH (i);
WARNING:  hash indexes are not WAL-logged and their use is discouraged
CREATE INDEX
postgres=# \d a
   Table public.a
 Column |  Type   | Modifiers 
+-+---
 i  | integer | 
Indexes:
a_i_idx hash (i)

postgres=# select relpersistence from pg_class where relname='a_i_idx';
 relpersistence 

 p
(1 row)

-- 
Antonin Houska
Cybertec Schönig  Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de, http://www.cybertec.at


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] pg_class(relpersistence) of hash index

2014-11-24 Thread Tom Lane
Antonin Houska a...@cybertec.at writes:
 While checking how BM_PERMANENT flag is set (in buffer header), I noticed that
 hash index has it set too. Shouldn't pg_class(relpersistence) be 'u' in this
 case?

See archives; we do not currently have a way to support unlogged indexes
on logged tables.  The whole hash-index mess would be better if we did,
but getting there is less than trivial.

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers