Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump: add option to ignore TABLE DATA for failed

2006-08-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Martin Pitt wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. Hi PostgreSQL developers, some time ago I started a discussion [1] here about modifying pg_dump to not restore TABLE DATA objects if the

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump: add option to ignore TABLE DATA for failed

2006-07-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. ---

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump: add option to ignore TABLE DATA for failed TABLE object creation

2006-07-24 Thread Jim Nasby
You should submit to -patches; at least that it should either get into the queue or you should get a reason why it didn't. On Jul 17, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: some time ago I started a discussion [1] here about modifying pg_dump to not restore TABLE DATA objects if the

[HACKERS] pg_dump: add option to ignore TABLE DATA for failed TABLE object creation

2006-07-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi PostgreSQL developers, some time ago I started a discussion [1] here about modifying pg_dump to not restore TABLE DATA objects if the corresponding TABLE oject failed to be created (usually because it already exists, but it might fail due to a different error like a nonexisting data type). We