Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump in current master segfaults when dumping 9.2/9.1 databases
On 26.03.2013 15:31, Bernd Helmle wrote: My current master segfaults with pg_dump when dumping a 9.1 or 9.2 database: $ LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 pg_dump -s -p 5448 pg_dump: column number -1 is out of range 0..22 zsh: segmentation fault LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 pg_dump -s -p 5448 The reason seems to be that getTables() in pg_dump.c forget to select relpages in the query for releases >= 90100. The error message comes from PQgetvalue(res, i, i_relpages), which complains about i_relpages being -1, which will then return NULL... Thanks, fixed. - Heikki -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[HACKERS] pg_dump in current master segfaults when dumping 9.2/9.1 databases
My current master segfaults with pg_dump when dumping a 9.1 or 9.2 database: $ LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 pg_dump -s -p 5448 pg_dump: column number -1 is out of range 0..22 zsh: segmentation fault LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 pg_dump -s -p 5448 The reason seems to be that getTables() in pg_dump.c forget to select relpages in the query for releases >= 90100. The error message comes from PQgetvalue(res, i, i_relpages), which complains about i_relpages being -1, which will then return NULL... -- Thanks Bernd -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers