Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl writes:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 02:05, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I'm wondering that it could have forgotten to migrate the later table
segments ...
It seems al 'truncated' tables give
pg_relation_size(oid) = 1073741824
Erik Rijkers wrote:
One complication: I hadn't noticed
that there were 2 tables with a not yet
installed datatype. These tables were
simply not created by the pg_migrator-run.
I don't know how this influenced the results,
but I'll repeat it in the coming days.
I have modified pg_migrator
Tom Lane wrote:
Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl writes:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 02:05, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I'm wondering that it could have forgotten to migrate the later table
segments ...
It seems al 'truncated' tables give
pg_relation_size(oid) = 1073741824
Looks like Alvaro nailed
Erik Rijkers wrote:
2009.05.09
pg_migrator alpha 5 results
from PostgreSQL 8.3.7 to 8.4cvs
Centos 5.2 x86_64 GNU/Linux
pg_migrator ran without errors.
Of 120 tables, all smaller tables
have the correct rowcount, but all
larger tables are 'truncated' at
around 10 million rows. I
On Sun, May 10, 2009 02:05, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Erik Rijkers wrote:
2009.05.09
pg_migrator alpha 5 results
from PostgreSQL 8.3.7 to 8.4cvs
Centos 5.2 x86_64 GNU/Linux
pg_migrator ran without errors.
Of 120 tables, all smaller tables
have the correct rowcount, but all
larger tables
Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl writes:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 02:05, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I'm wondering that it could have forgotten to migrate the later table
segments ...
It seems al 'truncated' tables give
pg_relation_size(oid) = 1073741824
Looks like Alvaro nailed it. Bruce, you reading?
2009.05.09
pg_migrator alpha 5 results
from PostgreSQL 8.3.7 to 8.4cvs
Centos 5.2 x86_64 GNU/Linux
pg_migrator ran without errors.
Of 120 tables, all smaller tables
have the correct rowcount, but all
larger tables are 'truncated' at
around 10 million rows. I haven't
looked at table content.
