Re: [HACKERS] pg_regress application_name

2012-02-18 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I figured it would be good if pg_regress reported its application_name > as "pg_regress" rather than "psql".  Any objections to the attached > patch? Sounds like a good idea to me, +1. --  Magnus Hagander  Me: http://www.hagander.net/  W

[HACKERS] pg_regress application_name

2012-02-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
I figured it would be good if pg_regress reported its application_name as "pg_regress" rather than "psql". Any objections to the attached patch? diff --git i/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c w/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c index 2f6b37b..1384223 100644 --- i/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c +++ w/src/t