On 09/03/2012 12:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Maybe, to reduce future backpatching pain, we could backpatch the change
to exec_prog() API now that you have fixed the implementation?
I'm inclined to think this is a good idea, but keep in mind we're
I have been wrestling for a couple of days trying to get pg_upgrade
testing working on Windows, with a view to having it tested on the
buildfarm. The test script has its own issues, which I'll deal with
separately, but there are two issues in pg_upgrade's exec.c that make me
suspect that if
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
I have been wrestling for a couple of days trying to get pg_upgrade
testing working on Windows, with a view to having it tested on the
buildfarm. The test script has its own issues, which I'll deal with
separately, but there are two issues in
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of dom sep 02 22:11:42 -0300 2012:
I have been wrestling for a couple of days trying to get pg_upgrade
testing working on Windows, with a view to having it tested on the
buildfarm. The test script has its own issues, which I'll deal with
separately,
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Maybe, to reduce future backpatching pain, we could backpatch the change
to exec_prog() API now that you have fixed the implementation?
I'm inclined to think this is a good idea, but keep in mind we're less
than four days from wrapping 9.2.0.
