Re: [HACKERS] plperl db access documentation enhancement

2010-03-11 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Bruce Momjian wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Patch applied for 9.0. We don't normally backpatch such documentation improvements unless we receive multiple reports of confusion. I think that's a mistake in this case. The documentation wasn't confusing -- it

Re: [HACKERS] plperl db access documentation enhancement

2010-02-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied for 9.0. We don't normally backpatch such documentation improvements unless we receive multiple reports of confusion. --- Alexey Klyukin wrote: Hello, We were asked by Enova Financial to improve the

Re: [HACKERS] plperl db access documentation enhancement

2010-02-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Bruce Momjian wrote: Patch applied for 9.0. We don't normally backpatch such documentation improvements unless we receive multiple reports of confusion. I think that's a mistake in this case. The documentation wasn't confusing -- it was bogus. (Actually, the bug fixing is a smaller change

Re: [HACKERS] plperl db access documentation enhancement

2010-02-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Patch applied for 9.0. We don't normally backpatch such documentation improvements unless we receive multiple reports of confusion. I think that's a mistake in this case. The documentation wasn't confusing -- it was bogus. (Actually, the

[HACKERS] plperl db access documentation enhancement

2010-01-29 Thread Alexey Klyukin
Hello, We were asked by Enova Financial to improve the documentation of PL/Perl database access functions. Alvaro and me worked on that and we produced the patch that is attached. It splits initial block of functions into the groups with the description directly following each of the group,