Re: [HACKERS] pnstrdup considered armed and dangerous

2017-10-03 Thread Andres Freund
On 2016-10-03 14:55:24 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> A colleage of me just wrote innocent looking code like
> char *shardRelationName = pnstrdup(relationName, NAMEDATALEN);
> which is at the moment wrong if relationName isn't preallocated to
> NAMEDATALEN size.
> 
> /*
>  * pnstrdup
>  *Like pstrdup(), but append null byte to a
>  *not-necessarily-null-terminated input string.
>  */
> char *
> pnstrdup(const char *in, Size len)
> {
>   char   *out = palloc(len + 1);
> 
>   memcpy(out, in, len);
>   out[len] = '\0';
>   return out;
> }
> 
> isn't that a somewhat weird behaviour / implementation? Not really like
> strndup(), which one might believe to be analoguous...

I've since hit this bug again. To fix it, you'd need strnlen. The lack
of which I'd also independently hit twice.  So here's a patch adding
pg_strnlen and using that to fix pnstrdup.

Greetings,

Andres Freund
>From 89ac4ce2cdad83806f83c0bc5ddac0e9ab1e038c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Freund 
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:43:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add pg_strnlen() a portable implementation of strlen.

As the OS version is likely going to be more optimized, fall back to
it if available, as detected by configure.
---
 configure |  2 +-
 configure.in  |  2 +-
 src/common/string.c   | 20 
 src/include/common/string.h   | 15 +++
 src/include/pg_config.h.in|  3 +++
 src/include/pg_config.h.win32 |  3 +++
 src/port/snprintf.c   | 12 ++--
 7 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 5fa7a61025..6584e47293 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -8777,7 +8777,7 @@ fi
 
 
 
-for ac_func in strerror_r getpwuid_r gethostbyname_r
+for ac_func in strerror_r getpwuid_r gethostbyname_r strnlen
 do :
   as_ac_var=`$as_echo "ac_cv_func_$ac_func" | $as_tr_sh`
 ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "$ac_func" "$as_ac_var"
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index bebbd11af9..15d4c85162 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ LIBS="$LIBS $PTHREAD_LIBS"
 AC_CHECK_HEADER(pthread.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([
 pthread.h not found;  use --disable-thread-safety to disable thread safety])])
 
-AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strerror_r getpwuid_r gethostbyname_r])
+AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strerror_r getpwuid_r gethostbyname_r strnlen])
 
 # Do test here with the proper thread flags
 PGAC_FUNC_STRERROR_R_INT
diff --git a/src/common/string.c b/src/common/string.c
index 159d9ea7b6..901821f3d8 100644
--- a/src/common/string.c
+++ b/src/common/string.c
@@ -41,3 +41,23 @@ pg_str_endswith(const char *str, const char *end)
 	str += slen - elen;
 	return strcmp(str, end) == 0;
 }
+
+
+/*
+ * Portable version of posix' strnlen.
+ *
+ * Returns the number of characters before a null-byte in the string pointed
+ * to by str, unless there's no null-byte before maxlen. In the latter case
+ * maxlen is returned.
+ */
+#ifndef HAVE_STRNLEN
+size_t
+pg_strnlen(const char *str, size_t maxlen)
+{
+	const char *p = str;
+
+	while (maxlen-- > 0 && *p)
+		p++;
+	return p - str;
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/src/include/common/string.h b/src/include/common/string.h
index 5f3ea71d61..3d46b80918 100644
--- a/src/include/common/string.h
+++ b/src/include/common/string.h
@@ -12,4 +12,19 @@
 
 extern bool pg_str_endswith(const char *str, const char *end);
 
+/*
+ * Portable version of posix' strnlen.
+ *
+ * Returns the number of characters before a null-byte in the string pointed
+ * to by str, unless there's no null-byte before maxlen. In the latter case
+ * maxlen is returned.
+ *
+ * Use the system strnlen if provided, it's likely to be faster.
+ */
+#ifdef HAVE_STRNLEN
+#define pg_strnlen(str, maxlen) strnlen(str, maxlen)
+#else
+extern size_t pg_strnlen(const char *str, size_t maxlen);
+#endif
+
 #endif			/* COMMON_STRING_H */
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
index b7ae9a0702..257262908c 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in
@@ -496,6 +496,9 @@
 /* Define to 1 if you have the `strlcpy' function. */
 #undef HAVE_STRLCPY
 
+/* Define to 1 if you have the `strnlen' function. */
+#undef HAVE_STRNLEN
+
 /* Define to use have a strong random number source */
 #undef HAVE_STRONG_RANDOM
 
diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.win32 b/src/include/pg_config.h.win32
index e6b3c5d551..08ae2f9a86 100644
--- a/src/include/pg_config.h.win32
+++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.win32
@@ -345,6 +345,9 @@
 /* Define to 1 if you have the  header file. */
 #define HAVE_STRING_H 1
 
+/* Define to 1 if you have the `strnlen' function. */
+#define HAVE_STRNLEN
+
 /* Define to use have a strong random number source */
 #define HAVE_STRONG_RANDOM 1
 
diff --git a/src/port/snprintf.c b/src/port/snprintf.c
index 231e5d6bdb..531d2c5ee3 100644
--- a/src/port/snprintf.c
+++ b/src/port/snprintf.c
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
 #endif
 #include 
 

Re: [HACKERS] pnstrdup considered armed and dangerous

2016-10-04 Thread Geoff Winkless
On 4 October 2016 at 14:12, Geoff Winkless  wrote:
> Well I wouldn't say it's wrong, exactly. It might produce a segfault
> if relationName[NAMEDATALEN] is outside readable memory for the
> process, but otherwise it will behave as defined.

Finger slippage. Of course I meant

... if relationName[NAMEDATALEN-1] is outside...

Geoff


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] pnstrdup considered armed and dangerous

2016-10-04 Thread Geoff Winkless
On 3 October 2016 at 22:55, Andres Freund  wrote:
> A colleage of me just wrote innocent looking code like
> char *shardRelationName = pnstrdup(relationName, NAMEDATALEN);
> which is at the moment wrong if relationName isn't preallocated to
> NAMEDATALEN size.
[snip]
> isn't that a somewhat weird behaviour / implementation? Not really like
> strndup(), which one might believe to be analoguous...

Well I wouldn't say it's wrong, exactly. It might produce a segfault
if relationName[NAMEDATALEN] is outside readable memory for the
process, but otherwise it will behave as defined.

Geoff


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] pnstrdup considered armed and dangerous

2016-10-04 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Andres Freund  wrote:
> /*
>  * pnstrdup
>  *  Like pstrdup(), but append null byte to a
>  *  not-necessarily-null-terminated input string.
>  */
> char *
> pnstrdup(const char *in, Size len)
> {
> char   *out = palloc(len + 1);
>
> memcpy(out, in, len);
> out[len] = '\0';
> return out;
> }
>
> isn't that a somewhat weird behaviour / implementation? Not really like
> strndup(), which one might believe to be analoguous...

Yikes!

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] pnstrdup considered armed and dangerous

2016-10-03 Thread Andres Freund
Hi,

A colleage of me just wrote innocent looking code like
char *shardRelationName = pnstrdup(relationName, NAMEDATALEN);
which is at the moment wrong if relationName isn't preallocated to
NAMEDATALEN size.

/*
 * pnstrdup
 *  Like pstrdup(), but append null byte to a
 *  not-necessarily-null-terminated input string.
 */
char *
pnstrdup(const char *in, Size len)
{
char   *out = palloc(len + 1);

memcpy(out, in, len);
out[len] = '\0';
return out;
}

isn't that a somewhat weird behaviour / implementation? Not really like
strndup(), which one might believe to be analoguous...

Greetings,

Andres Freund


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers