Giles Lean wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I suppose that at least some of the *BSD herd really do predefine some
> > of the symbols being attributed to them here, but I would like to see
> > something authoritative about which and what.
>
> Documentation follows, but first the summary:
>
> F
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not even too sure what "bsdi" is, but I'm suspicious of that branch
> too. A search of our code finds
>
> contrib/pg_upgrade/file.c: 248: #elif defined(freebsd) || defined(bsdi) ||
> defined(__darwin__) || defined(openbsd)
> src/backend/utils/misc/ps_status.c: 67: #elif (de
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On l?r, 2010-05-15 at 00:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like it's dead now.
BSDI is the company that produced BSD/OS,
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On l?r, 2010-05-15 at 00:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
> > nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like it's dead now.
>
> BSDI is the company that produced BSD/OS, which was Bruce's main
> dev
Tom Lane wrote:
> I suppose that at least some of the *BSD herd really do predefine some
> of the symbols being attributed to them here, but I would like to see
> something authoritative about which and what.
Documentation follows, but first the summary:
FreeBSD: __FreeBSD__
NetBSD: __NetBSD_
On lör, 2010-05-15 at 00:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
> nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like it's dead now.
BSDI is the company that produced BSD/OS, which was Bruce's main
development environment at some point,
On lör, 2010-05-15 at 00:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I suppose that at least some of the *BSD herd really do predefine some
> of the symbols being attributed to them here, but I would like to see
> something authoritative about which and what.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porte
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm not even too sure what "bsdi" is, but I'm suspicious of that branch
>>> too. A search of our code finds
>
>> It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it
Robert Haas writes:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not even too sure what "bsdi" is, but I'm suspicious of that branch
>> too. A search of our code finds
> It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
> nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not even too sure what "bsdi" is, but I'm suspicious of that branch
> too. A search of our code finds
It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like it's dead now.
To
The recently added contrib/pg_upgrade code contains this bit:
/*
* scandir() is originally from BSD 4.3, which had the third argument as
* non-const. Linux and other C libraries have updated it to use a const.
*
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2005-12/
11 matches
Mail list logo
