Pavel,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
true, sorry, I have a different wording in first design
fixed
Pushed, thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Stephen
I forgot to fix new enhanced pset help
fix attached
Regards
Pavel
2014-09-12 18:15 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
2014-09-12 18:09 GMT+02:00 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
* Pavel Stehule
On 2014-09-18 12:47:25 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
- output = PageOutput(81, pager);
+ output = PageOutput(87, pager);
fprintf(output, _(List of specially treated variables.\n));
@@ -364,6 +364,10 @@ helpVariables(unsigned short int pager)
2014-09-18 12:51 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com:
On 2014-09-18 12:47:25 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
- output = PageOutput(81, pager);
+ output = PageOutput(87, pager);
fprintf(output, _(List of specially treated variables.\n));
@@ -364,6 +364,10 @@
2014-09-12 5:14 GMT+02:00 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
Pavel,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
Any idea, tip how to it?
Attached is what I had been thinking.
Thoughts?
yes, it is better. I didn't understand before.
I though about it because it allows to design
2014-09-12 8:19 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
2014-09-12 5:14 GMT+02:00 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
Pavel,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
Any idea, tip how to it?
Attached is what I had been thinking.
Thoughts?
yes, it is better. I didn't
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I though about it, and we cannot to drop it now. These symbols are
necessary, because we don't support line between rows.
I am thinking so 05 patch should be final
Ok. I'm going to play with it a bit more but barring issues, should get
it
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I though about it, and we cannot to drop it now. These symbols are
necessary, because we don't support line between rows.
I am thinking so 05 patch should be final
Ok. I'm going to play with
2014-09-12 18:09 GMT+02:00 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I though about it, and we cannot to drop it now. These symbols are
necessary, because we don't support line between rows.
I am
Pavel,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I removed dynamic allocation and reduced patch size.
This is certainly better, imv, though there are a couple of minor
issues (extra semi-colons, extraneous whitespace, get_line_style was
still changed to non-const, even though it doesn't
Hi
2014-09-11 16:42 GMT+02:00 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
Pavel,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I removed dynamic allocation and reduced patch size.
This is certainly better, imv, though there are a couple of minor
issues (extra semi-colons, extraneous
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
2014-09-11 16:42 GMT+02:00 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
I don't particularly like this (having these fields set in
refresh_utf8format to hard-coded strings in the function), why not have
those handled the same as the rest, where the
Pavel,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
Any idea, tip how to it?
Attached is what I had been thinking.
Thoughts?
Thanks!
Stephen
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml
index aa71674..1d59dce 100644
---
Hi
I removed dynamic allocation and reduced patch size.
What I tested a old unicode style is same as new unicode style. There
nothing was changed .. some fields are specified in refresh_utf8format
function
Regards
Pavel
2014-09-08 4:44 GMT+02:00 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
Pavel,
Pavel,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
2014-07-23 8:38 GMT+02:00 Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz:
OK, thanks. The new version seems OK to me.
Thank you
I've started looking over the patch and went back through the previous
thread about it. For my part, I'm in favor of adding
On 23 Červenec 2014, 7:36, Pavel Stehule wrote:
updated version is in attachment
OK, thanks. The new version seems OK to me.
Tomas
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
2014-07-23 8:38 GMT+02:00 Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz:
On 23 Červenec 2014, 7:36, Pavel Stehule wrote:
updated version is in attachment
OK, thanks. The new version seems OK to me.
Thank you
Pavel
Tomas
On 28.6.2014 21:29, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
rebase for 9.5
test:
\pset linestyle unicode \pset border 2
\pset unicode_header_linestyle double
\l
Regards
Pavel
I did a quick review of the patch today:
* it applies cleanly to current HEAD (no failures, small offsets)
*
Hi Tomas
2014-07-22 23:20 GMT+02:00 Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz:
On 28.6.2014 21:29, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
rebase for 9.5
test:
\pset linestyle unicode \pset border 2
\pset unicode_header_linestyle double
\l
Regards
Pavel
I did a quick review of the patch today:
Hello
rebase for 9.5
test:
\pset linestyle unicode \pset border 2
\pset unicode_header_linestyle double
\l
Regards
Pavel
2014-03-11 21:17 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
Hello
I had to reduce allowed line style to single or double, because unicode
allows only
Hello
I had to reduce allowed line style to single or double, because unicode
allows only combination single,double or single,thick
postgres=# \l
List of databases
Name| Owner | Encoding | Collate |Ctype| Access
privileges
Hello
I am returning back to this topic. Last time I proposed styles:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cafj8prclgoktryjpbtoncpgyftrcz-zgfowdc1jqulb+ede...@mail.gmail.com
http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql
This experiment fails, but there are some interesting tips in discuss.
22 matches
Mail list logo
