On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 00:20 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
It seems working well with the latest git master.
I think it's good enough to be committed.
Committed, thanks.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Hi,
I have tried this patch.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1051
2013/01/29 14:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 07:14 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
commands do. While at it, I also
Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp writes:
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 07:14 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
BTW, is there any good place to put new regression test for the psql
command? I couldn't find it out.
As far as a test for
(2013/01/30 0:34), Tom Lane wrote:
Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp writes:
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 07:14 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
BTW, is there any good place to put new regression test for the psql
command? I couldn't
Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp writes:
First of all, I was looking for some regression tests for
CREATE/ALTER/DROP DATABASE commands, but I couldn't find them
in the test/regress/sql/ directory. So, I asked the question.
I guess these database tests are in pg_regress.c. Right?
Yeah, we
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 07:14 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
commands do. While at it, I also added an S option to show system
objects and removed system objects from the default display. This might
be a bit controversial, but
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 17:37 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
If we make the postgres database undroppable, unrenamable, and
strictly read-only, I will happily support a proposal to consider it a
system object. Until then, it's
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Good point. What about the other suggestion about only displaying
databases by default that you can connect to?
I would tend not to adopt that suggestion, on the grounds
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 17:37 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
If we make the postgres database undroppable, unrenamable, and
strictly read-only, I will happily support a proposal to consider it a
system object. Until then, it's no more a system object than the
public schema - which, you will note,
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
commands do. While at it, I also added an S option to show system
objects and removed system objects from the default display. This might
be a bit controversial, but it's how it was decided some time ago that
the \d commands
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
commands do. While at it, I also added an S option to show system
objects and removed system objects from the default display. This might
be a bit
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
commands do. While at it, I also added an S option to show system
objects and removed system objects from the default display. This might
be a bit controversial, but it's how it was decided some time
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
commands do. While at it, I also added an S option to show system
objects and removed system objects from the default display. This might
be a bit
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
commands do. While at it, I also added an S option to show system
objects and removed system objects from the
On 1/7/13 3:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
commands do. While at it, I also added an S option to show system
objects and removed system objects from the
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
We removed showing system functions and operators from \df and \do
without S. Those are needed all the time. This was controversial at
the time, but it's the way it is now. The definition of S, I suppose,
is more like
16 matches
Mail list logo
