Re: [HACKERS] psql showing owner in \dT

2015-04-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: After running into the need twice now - is there a particular reason why we don't have psql showing the owner of a type, at least in \dT+? Can't think of anything ... If not, how about

[HACKERS] psql showing owner in \dT

2015-04-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
After running into the need twice now - is there a particular reason why we don't have psql showing the owner of a type, at least in \dT+? If not, how about attached trivial patch? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ ***

Re: [HACKERS] psql showing owner in \dT

2015-04-09 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Magnus Hagander wrote: After running into the need twice now - is there a particular reason why we don't have psql showing the owner of a type, at least in \dT+? Can't think of anything ... If not, how about attached trivial patch? Owner should normally be printed before ACL, no? --