Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-27 Thread ohp
ler@lerctr.org To: ohp@pyrenet.fr Cc: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'pgsql-hackers list' pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS On Jul 26 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote: FWIW, I just checked that CVS tip

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and correct it? I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't have/want the patch installed. Regards Let's see what they find, first. They may have a work-around (they

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-27 Thread Andrew Dunstan
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and correct it? I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't have/want the patch installed. All the evidence is that this is a compiler bug. The apparent workaround

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Jul 27 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote: ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and correct it? I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't have/want the patch installed. All the evidence is that this is a

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Jul 27 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and correct it? I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't have/want the patch installed.

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andrew Dunstan wrote: ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and correct it? I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't have/want the patch installed. All the evidence is that this is a

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Jul 26 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote: FWIW, I just checked that CVS tip works OK for me without these options, with either integer or float timestamps. I don't see any new warnings, either. It could well be that the recent changes have introduced some

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-26 Thread ohp
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote: Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:26:20 -0400 From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, 'pgsql-hackers list' pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS Larry Rosenman ler

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread ohp
Sorry to follow up my own post but this is weird. I've tested again and more closely. And intervall check is ok when configured with --enable-debug and fails (with the same error) otherwise. It could be a compiler optimizer bug or the way the code is written. Could someone point me to the source

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: Sorry to follow up my own post but this is weird. I've tested again and more closely. And intervall check is ok when configured with --enable-debug and fails (with the same error) otherwise. It could be a compiler optimizer bug or the way the code is

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread ohp
: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: Sorry to follow up my own post but this is weird. I've tested again and more closely. And intervall check is ok when configured with --enable-debug

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: Hi Larry, I'm quitge sure you'll see a problem if you remove --enable-debug --enable-cassert from your ./configure Do we have a clue as to which .c module the compiler/optimizer is (possibly) screwing up? I have connections in SCO's compiler group

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote: Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org To: ohp@pyrenet.fr Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS On Jul 25

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread ohp
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote: Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org To: ohp@pyrenet.fr Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: Hi Larry

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Jim C. Nasby
This is the problem I have. Regards On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote: Date: 25 Jul 2005 09:00:41 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org To: ohp@pyrenet.fr Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS On Jul 25 2005

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote: Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org To: ohp@pyrenet.fr Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS On Jul 25 2005, ohp

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
] regression failure on latest CVS On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: Hi Larry, I'm quitge sure you'll see a problem if you remove --enable-debug --enable-cassert from your ./configure For those following along at home: Removing --enable-cassert and --enable-debug from

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Larry Rosenman wrote: ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote: Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org To: ohp@pyrenet.fr Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
Larry Rosenman wrote: ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote: Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org To: ohp@pyrenet.fr Cc: pgsql-hackers list pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org writes: For those following along at home: Removing --enable-cassert and --enable-debug from the options causes Firefly to fail. FWIW, I just checked that CVS tip works OK for me without these options, with either integer or float timestamps. I don't see any new

Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS

2005-07-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org writes: For those following along at home: Removing --enable-cassert and --enable-debug from the options causes Firefly to fail. FWIW, I just checked that CVS tip works OK for me without these options, with either integer or float timestamps.