Re: [HACKERS] rewriteheap.c bug: toast rows don't get XIDs matching their parents

2012-01-27 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > While working on bug #6393 I was reminded of the truth of $SUBJECT: any > rows inserted into the new toast table will have the xmin of the CLUSTER > or VACUUM FULL operation, and invalid xmax, whereas their parent heap > rows will have xmin/xmax c

[HACKERS] rewriteheap.c bug: toast rows don't get XIDs matching their parents

2012-01-12 Thread Tom Lane
While working on bug #6393 I was reminded of the truth of $SUBJECT: any rows inserted into the new toast table will have the xmin of the CLUSTER or VACUUM FULL operation, and invalid xmax, whereas their parent heap rows will have xmin/xmax copied from the previous instance of the table. This does n