Yes, I found the following thread started by you in the
pgsql-performance list:
Subject: [PERFORM] best way to fetch next/prev record based on index
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:18:43 -0700
there were some concerns about backwards compatibility.
IMO 8.0 is a good chance to fix it. Maybe
Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-07/msg00218.php
Still, I think the current behavior is wrong...and is exactly the kind
of trick question that a sql compliance benchmark might ask.
It undoubtedly is wrong. But it has been wrong
Following result seems strange since it is not what the standard
expects:
test=# select (1,1) (0,10);
?column?
--
f
(1 row)
On the other hand I see following in the doc:
-
9.17.5. Row-wise Comparison
(expression [, expression ...]) operator
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess this means that PostgreSQL does not fully support SQL's
row-wise comparison. We need to add this to the TODO list?
I thought it was there already ... certainly this has been discussed
before ...
regards, tom lane
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess this means that PostgreSQL does not fully support SQL's
row-wise comparison. We need to add this to the TODO list?
I thought it was there already ... certainly this has been discussed
before ...
This was discussed (including a possible
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess this means that PostgreSQL does not fully support SQL's
row-wise comparison. We need to add this to the TODO list?
I thought it was there already ... certainly this has been discussed
before ...
This was discussed (including a
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess this means that PostgreSQL does not fully support SQL's
row-wise comparison. We need to add this to the TODO list?
I thought it was there already ... certainly this has been discussed
before ...
This was
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I remember the thread but didn't see a TODO in there at the time.
* Make row-wise comparisons work per SQL spec
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to
