On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I'm back now and will act as advertised.
I've revoked the performance aspect. The difference between release
and commit has been maintained since it makes the code easier to
understand.
--
Simon Riggs
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net wrote:
This patch:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605
Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten
about...
Has it already been
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net wrote:
This patch:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605
Seems to have been after thoughts, and
This patch:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605
Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten about...
Has it already been commit?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2011-07/msg00206.php
Oh, wait, nevermind, it was revoked and
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net wrote:
This patch:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605
Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten
about...
Has it already been commit?