Re: [HACKERS] savepoint commit performance

2011-09-07 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: I'm back now and will act as advertised. I've revoked the performance aspect. The difference between release and commit has been maintained since it makes the code easier to understand. --  Simon Riggs  

Re: [HACKERS] savepoint commit performance

2011-09-06 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net wrote: This patch: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605 Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten about... Has it already been

Re: [HACKERS] savepoint commit performance

2011-09-06 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net wrote: This patch: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605 Seems to have been after thoughts, and

[HACKERS] savepoint commit performance

2011-09-05 Thread Andy Colson
This patch: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605 Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten about... Has it already been commit? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2011-07/msg00206.php Oh, wait, nevermind, it was revoked and

Re: [HACKERS] savepoint commit performance

2011-09-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andy Colson a...@squeakycode.net wrote: This patch: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=605 Seems to have been after thoughts, and back burner stuff, and forgotten about... Has it already been commit?