Peter Eisentraut writes:
> We currently don't represent the sequence privileges in the information
> schema. We could perhaps do a subset of them.
> In the SQL standard, there is only the USAGE privilege, and its only
> purpose (AFAICT) is to allow the NEXT VALUE FOR expression.
> PostgreSQL's n
We currently don't represent the sequence privileges in the information
schema. We could perhaps do a subset of them.
In the SQL standard, there is only the USAGE privilege, and its only
purpose (AFAICT) is to allow the NEXT VALUE FOR expression.
PostgreSQL's nextval(), by contrast, requires both