Re: [HACKERS] soundex and metaphone

2005-05-26 Thread Ron Mayer
Jonah H. Harris wrote: I'm willing to move soundex and metaphone into the backend. Does anyone see a reason not to do so? As a kinda strange reason, I like them in contrib because they demonstrate a nice simple example of how one can write a contrib extension. This module has simple functions

Re: [HACKERS] soundex and metaphone

2005-05-26 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: "Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: At a minimum I think we should support soundex in the core. I'm willing to move soundex and metaphone into the backend. Does anyone see a reason not to do so? Is it really ready for prime time? For one thing, a quick

Re: [HACKERS] soundex and metaphone

2005-05-26 Thread Tom Lane
"Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At a minimum I think we should support soundex in the core. I'm willing > to move soundex and metaphone into the backend. Does anyone see a > reason not to do so? Is it really ready for prime time? For one thing, a quick look shows no evidence o

Re: [HACKERS] soundex and metaphone

2005-05-26 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Jonah H. Harris wrote: At a minimum I think we should support soundex in the core. I'm willing to move soundex and metaphone into the backend. Does anyone see a reason not to do so? I take it you mean apart from the fact that soundex is horribly limited and out of data and probably nobo

Re: [HACKERS] soundex and metaphone

2005-05-26 Thread Jonah H. Harris
Peter, I don't disagree with you that a more generalized function would also be good, just that soundex is common and would be helpful if it were built-in. Peter Eisentraut wrote: Jonah H. Harris wrote: At a minimum I think we should support soundex in the core. I'm willing to move soun

Re: [HACKERS] soundex and metaphone

2005-05-26 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Jonah H. Harris wrote: > At a minimum I think we should support soundex in the core. I'm > willing to move soundex and metaphone into the backend. Does anyone > see a reason not to do so? Soundex is really only useful for English names with English pronunciation. If we were to adapt a phonetic

Re: [HACKERS] soundex and metaphone

2005-05-26 Thread Jonah H. Harris
At a minimum I think we should support soundex in the core. I'm willing to move soundex and metaphone into the backend. Does anyone see a reason not to do so? Douglas McNaught wrote: "Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hey everyone, I've been working with a couple people who

Re: [HACKERS] soundex and metaphone

2005-05-26 Thread Douglas McNaught
"Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hey everyone, > > I've been working with a couple people who didn't know that soundex > and metaphone were included in the distribution as contrib modules. > While it's their fault that they didn't check contrib, soundex is > pretty common among data

[HACKERS] soundex and metaphone

2005-05-24 Thread Jonah H. Harris
Hey everyone, I've been working with a couple people who didn't know that soundex and metaphone were included in the distribution as contrib modules. While it's their fault that they didn't check contrib, soundex is pretty common among database systems and I was wondering if there was a reaso