Re: [HACKERS] textToQualifiedNameList second parameter
On 2/24/06, Rafael Martinez Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello In version 7.4.x, the function textToQualifiedNameList was defined with two parameters. Some months ago, the second parameter was removed [1] so I had to modify my program to work after this change. Now with 8.0.7, the second parameter is back again and I get this error when I try to compile: so, your progam rely on internal functions from someone else's software? bad idea Is the second parameter back again? [1]: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-05/msg00307.php -- regards, Jaime Casanova What they (MySQL) lose in usability, they gain back in benchmarks, and that's all that matters: getting the wrong answer really fast. Randal L. Schwartz ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
[HACKERS] textToQualifiedNameList second parameter
Hello In version 7.4.x, the function textToQualifiedNameList was defined with two parameters. Some months ago, the second parameter was removed [1] so I had to modify my program to work after this change. Now with 8.0.7, the second parameter is back again and I get this error when I try to compile: pg_dbsize.c: In function `relation_size': pg_dbsize.c:295: too few arguments to function `textToQualifiedNameList' make: *** [pg_dbsize] Error 1 Is the second parameter back again? [1]: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-05/msg00307.php -- Rafael Martinez, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo, Norway PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] textToQualifiedNameList second parameter
Rafael Martinez Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Some months ago, the second parameter was removed [1] so I had to modify my program to work after this change. Now with 8.0.7, the second parameter is back again I think you're confused. The second parameter was removed in 8.1. It's present in all prior branches AFAICS. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
