Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2006-07-04 kell 14:53, kirjutas Zeugswetter
Andreas DCP SD:
Is there a difference in PostgreSQL performance between these two
different strategies:
if(!exec(update foo set bar='blahblah' where name = 'xx'))
exec(insert into foo(name, bar)
Mark,
I don't know how it will exactly works in postgres but my expectations are:
Mark Woodward wrote:
Is there a difference in PostgreSQL performance between these two
different strategies:
if(!exec(update foo set bar='blahblah' where name = 'xx'))
exec(insert into foo(name, bar)
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:59:27AM +0200, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Mark,
I don't know how it will exactly works in postgres but my expectations are:
Mark Woodward wrote:
Is there a difference in PostgreSQL performance between these two
different strategies:
if(!exec(update foo set
Is there a difference in PostgreSQL performance between these two
different strategies:
if(!exec(update foo set bar='blahblah' where name = 'xx'))
exec(insert into foo(name, bar) values('xx','blahblah'); or
In pg, this strategy is generally more efficient, since a pk failing
Is there a difference in PostgreSQL performance between these two
different strategies:
if(!exec(update foo set bar='blahblah' where name = 'xx'))
exec(insert into foo(name, bar) values('xx','blahblah');
or
exec(delete from foo where name = 'xx');
exec(insert into foo(name, bar)
