On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Tom Lane wrote:
Kris Jurka bo...@ejurka.com writes:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Mike Fowler wrote:
As there seems to be a consensus forming for fixing the JDBC driver, I've
taken the liberty do so at the risk of being shot down. The patch is fairly
straightforward, just
Kris Jurka bo...@ejurka.com writes:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Tom Lane wrote:
For purposes of the notes in the server-side fix, could you state which
JDBC driver versions these changes will first appear in?
This is in 9.1dev-900 and won't be backpatched.
OK, thanks. I've committed a patch to
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bernd Helmle maili...@oopsware.de writes:
If i am reading it correct, it reads UTF8 from the backend, while
expecting UNICODE only. Not sure what change has caused this,
though.
I am --- when I redid the GUC assign_hook
On 18/04/11 15:57, Tom Lane wrote:
Bernd Helmlemaili...@oopsware.de writes:
If i am reading it correct, it reads UTF8 from the backend, while
expecting UNICODE only. Not sure what change has caused this,
though.
I am --- when I redid the GUC assign_hook logic a few weeks ago,
I changed the
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com wrote:
On 18/04/11 15:57, Tom Lane wrote:
Bernd Helmlemaili...@oopsware.de writes:
If i am reading it correct, it reads UTF8 from the backend, while
expecting UNICODE only. Not sure what change has caused this,
though.
I am
Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I wasn't aware that JDBC would fail on that. It's pretty annoying that
it does, but maybe we should grin and bear it, ie revert the change to
canonicalize the GUC's value?
Older
Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com writes:
On 18/04/11 15:57, Tom Lane wrote:
I am --- when I redid the GUC assign_hook logic a few weeks ago,
I changed the client_encoding code so that it shows the normalized
(official) name of the encoding, not whatever random string the client
sent over. For
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I wasn't aware that JDBC would fail on that. It's pretty annoying that
it does, but maybe we should grin and bear
Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Yeah. I'm thinking what we should do here is revert the change, with a
note in the source about why, and also change the JDBC driver to send
and expect UTF8 not UNICODE (which as Kevin
On 04/18/2011 11:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
What concerns me most is that (assuming my dates are right) the JDBC driver
has been
broken for 11 days and no one noticed. This would lead me to believe
that there is no JDBC build server. What would it take to set one up?
+1 for doing something
On 18/04/11 17:35, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 04/18/2011 11:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
What concerns me most is that (assuming my dates are right) the
JDBC driver has been
broken for 11 days and no one noticed. This would lead me to believe
that there is no JDBC build server. What would it take
On 18/04/11 17:12, Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Cramerp...@fastcrypt.com writes:
Well initially my concern was that people would have a challenge in
the case where they had to re-certify their application if we made
this change, however I realize they will have to do this anyway since
upgrading to 9.1
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Mike Fowler wrote:
On 18/04/11 17:12, Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Cramerp...@fastcrypt.com writes:
Well initially my concern was that people would have a challenge in
the case where they had to re-certify their application if we made
this change, however I realize they will
Kris Jurka bo...@ejurka.com writes:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Mike Fowler wrote:
As there seems to be a consensus forming for fixing the JDBC driver, I've
taken the liberty do so at the risk of being shot down. The patch is fairly
straightforward, just changing UNICODE to UTF8 in a number of
14 matches
Mail list logo
