Hi, Tom,
Tom Lane schrieb:
> Yeah, but only because you have to do it explicitly. I was wondering
> whether we couldn't bury that mechanism under the hood. (In particular,
> given the improved support in 8.0 for anonymous record types, we could
> in theory have the backend invent a record type
Markus Schaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane schrieb:
>> given the improved support in 8.0 for anonymous record types, we could
>> in theory have the backend invent a record type on-the-fly to match
>> whatever list of OUT parameters a particular function has.)
> It would not be necessari
