Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Billy G. Allie writes: I disagree that it's a new feature. The code to add the -rpath (-R) option was already there. My patch made it more useful in that the additional search libraries are now placed in the -rpath (-R) option. Yeah, you're doing additional things, so it's a new feature.

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-08 Thread Olivier PRENANT
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Billy G. Allie [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a --On Thursday, November 07, 2002 22:21:56 +0100 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Olivier PRENANT writes: I

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-08 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: +For compilers earlier than the one released with OpenUNIX 8.0.0(UnixWare +7.1.2), Including the 7.1.1b Feature Supplement, you may need to specify -Xb + in CFLAGS or the CC environment variable. The indication of this is an +error in compiling

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-08 Thread Larry Rosenman
Do y'all want a new diff, or can you deal with it when you do the patch? LER --On Friday, November 08, 2002 09:45:44 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: +For compilers earlier than the one released with OpenUNIX 8.0.0(UnixWare +7.1.2), Including

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
I will deal with it when I apply. --- Larry Rosenman wrote: Do y'all want a new diff, or can you deal with it when you do the patch? LER --On Friday, November 08, 2002 09:45:44 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied to 7.3 and CVS, with Tom's correction. --- Larry Rosenman wrote: Here is diff. Please let me know if you need better wording. --On Thursday, November 07, 2002 16:50:26 -0600 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Olivier PRENANT
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch. We already have success messages from Olivier Prenant for 7.3B4 on 8.0.0, and me for 7.1.3. I don't believe your changes are necessary

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch. We already have success messages from Olivier Prenant for 7.3B4 on 8.0.0, and me for 7.1.3. I don't believe your changes are necessary. --On Wednesday, November 06, 2002 22:57:26 -0500 Billy G. Allie [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Olivier PRENANT
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote: Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 06:41:02 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Billy G. Allie [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a --On Thursday, November 07, 2002 13:32:18 +0100 Olivier PRENANT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's true! But I had to export CFLAGS=-Xb to compile (this should be in port Makefile IMHO) Tom fixed

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Tom Lane
Olivier PRENANT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Huh! I just tried to compile 7.3b5 without CFLAGS=-Xb, it still bugs the compiler... It won't get better if you don't show any details... regards, tom lane ---(end of

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Olivier PRENANT
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote: Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 08:41:58 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Billy G. Allie [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a Tom fixed that with a later tuplesort.c fix (per a discussion with the Caldera/SCO compiler guys). Huh! I just tried to compile 7.3b5 without CFLAGS=-Xb, it still bugs the compiler... Didn't for me

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Billy G. Allie [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a Olivier PRENANT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Huh! I just tried to compile 7.3b5 without CFLAGS=-Xb, it still bugs the compiler

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Olivier PRENANT
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote: Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:21:25 -0500 From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED], Billy G. Allie [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Tom Lane
Olivier PRENANT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *WHAT??** this directory has hust been created by de-taring postgresql-7.3b5.tar.gz from my own mirror dated nov 6 20:04... Well, there's something darn weird here. Is src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c version 1.28 or 1.29? At line 1838, do you see

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Olivier PRENANT
] Cc: Billy G. Allie [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a It looks like you do **NOT** have B4 or B5 LER --On Thursday, November 07, 2002 17:00:21 +0100 Olivier PRENANT [EMAIL

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Olivier PRENANT
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Billy G. Allie [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a Olivier PRENANT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *WHAT??** this directory has hust been created by de-taring postgresql-7.3b5

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a Olivier PRENANT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *WHAT??** this directory has hust been created by de-taring postgresql-7.3b5.tar.gz from my own mirror dated nov 6 20:04... Well, there's something

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a It **LOOKS** right. I'm about to double check it on 7.1.3. Olivier, is this the 7.1.1b FS Compiler? I wonder if a bug fix made it in... Wierd. --On Thursday, November 07

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Olivier PRENANT
PROTECTED], Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Billy G. Allie [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a It **LOOKS** right. I'm about to double check it on 7.1.3. Olivier, is this the 7.1.1b FS Compiler

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
: Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:37:36 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Billy G. Allie [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a It **LOOKS** right

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Olivier PRENANT
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a cc -O -g -I../../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -c -o tuplesort.o tuplesort.c UX:cc: WARNING: debugging and optimization mutually exclusive; -O disabled

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED], Billy G. Allie [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a cc -O -g -I../../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -c -o tuplesort.o

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Olivier PRENANT writes: I don't mind having CFLAGS=-Xb though, done it for php already... By everyone says this should go off so.. The idea of the platform testing is not to determine whether you can compile PostgreSQL after performing a secret dance. If it doesn't compile with the default

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: I am fine with this because it only touches unixware-specific stuff, This is an entirely new feature, so it's inappropriate to do now. And if we do it, we should do it for all platforms. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 22:21:56 +0100 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Olivier PRENANT writes: I don't mind having CFLAGS=-Xb though, done it for php already... By everyone says this should go off so.. The idea of the platform testing is not to determine whether you can

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It DOES compile out of the box now on 8.0.0(7.1.2) and 7.1.3. Apparently a compiler fix between the 7.1.1b FS and 7.1.2. Well, this is what the REMARKS column is for in the supported-platform list. Seems we need a comment like for older compiler

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
For compilers earlier than the one released with OpenUNIX 8.0.0(UnixWare 7.1.2), Including the 7.1.1b Feature Supplement, you may need to specify -Xb in CFLAGS or the CC environment variable. --On Thursday, November 07, 2002 16:34:12 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
We do point to the FAQ_SCO file for specifics. Would you send a diff for that file? --- Larry Rosenman wrote: For compilers earlier than the one released with OpenUNIX 8.0.0(UnixWare 7.1.2), Including the 7.1.1b

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
With or withou Billie's update(s)? (I haven't looked at them) LER --On Thursday, November 07, 2002 17:08:04 -0500 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We do point to the FAQ_SCO file for specifics. Would you send a diff for that file?

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
His updates deal only with the LDLIBRARY path issue, which I think we are keeping for 7.4: *** ./doc/FAQ_SCO.orig Wed Nov 6 21:35:46 2002 --- ./doc/FAQ_SCO Wed Nov 6 21:40:44 2002 *** *** 71,76 --- 71,79 configure --with-libs=/usr/local/lib

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
OK, I'll try and do up a diff to B5's tonite (probably late, my Daughter's elementary school honors choir has a performance tonite). LER --On Thursday, November 07, 2002 17:44:37 -0500 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: His updates deal only with the LDLIBRARY path issue, which I think

Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a

2002-11-07 Thread Billy G. Allie
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: I am fine with this because it only touches unixware-specific stuff, This is an entirely new feature, so it's inappropriate to do now. And if we do it, we should do it for all platforms. I disagree that it's a new feature. The code to add