uncompressed.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: Greg Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephen L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:56 PM
Subject: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 Wishlist
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 09:36, Stephen L. wrote
]
To: Stephen L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:56 PM
Subject: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 Wishlist
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 09:36, Stephen L. wrote:
6. Compression between client/server interface like in MySQL
Greg Copeland wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 11:25, Al Sutton wrote:
Would it be possible to make compression an optional thing, with the default
being off?
I'm not sure. You'd have to ask Command Prompt (Mammoth) or wait to see
what appears. What I originally had envisioned was a per
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 13:38, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I haven't heard anything about them contributing it. Doesn't mean it
will not happen, just that I haven't heard it.
This was in non-mailing list emails that I was told this by Joshua Drake
at Command Prompt. Of course, that doesn't have to
Yes, the issue was that give our TODO list, compressed transfer wasn't
very high, and it was unknown how valuable it would be. However, if it
were contributed, we could easily test its value with little work on our
part and include the code if it were a win.
PROTECTED]; PostgresSQL Hackers
Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 Wishlist
Hello,
We would probably be open to contributing it if there was interest.
There wasn't interest initially.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
