Folks,
Re: moving the main project to GForge/whatever: we're not considering that at
this time.
The way the discussion got entangled is that a few people mentioned wanting a
better bug tracker than then one offered with GForge, and that we are
considering using a Bug Tracker for the main proje
On Feb 26, 2004, at 6:53 PM, Joseph Tate wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Folks,
Discuss:
Has anyone talked to the people at collabnet (http://www.collab.net)?
I wonder if they'd be willing to put something together for the
PostgreSQL team? They run the tigris.org site, which is one of the
nicest O
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 13:19, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > What does the Apache project run?
>
> Not sure. Anyone?
>
Apache uses a home-brew collection of OSS tools. I think they have the
advantage of a larger community of web developers to help out than we
have ;-)
Josh, are you still in favor of t
Robert,
> Josh, are you still in favor of this move if the larger community does
> not want to move the main project to a gforge based system? or vice
> versa?
Not sure. Depends on what the leads of the associated projects think.
Obviously, if everyone's dead set against it, we won't do it.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 10:49:46AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> Not sure. Depends on what the leads of the associated projects think.
> Obviously, if everyone's dead set against it, we won't do it.
I for one am willing to try this in the near term. I've got an external
domain (pqxx.tk) poi
Jeroen,
> I for one am willing to try this in the near term.
Great!
> I've got an external
> domain (pqxx.tk) pointing to the libpqxx page on GBorg, and moving it over
> to a new URL is child's play. My main worry is transition management:
>
> - How will mailing list subscribers be affected?
