My solution would be to use INT_MIN for all ports, which has the advantage
that the above problematic comparison can be converted to !=,
since no integer will be smaller than INT_MIN.
I agree. When I was looking at this code this morning, I was wondering
what INT_MIN was supposed to
Zeugswetter Andreas SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree. When I was looking at this code this morning, I was wondering
what INT_MIN was supposed to represent anyway, if NOSTART_ABSTIME is
INT_MIN + 1. I think someone messed this up between 4.2 and Postgres95.
Has there been any consensus
