On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Claudio Freire
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Alexey Chernyshov
>> wrote:
>>> Thank you for the patch and benchmark results, I have a couple remarks.
>>> Firstly, padding in DeadTuplesSegmen
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Alexey Chernyshov
> wrote:
>> Thank you for the patch and benchmark results, I have a couple remarks.
>> Firstly, padding in DeadTuplesSegment
>>
>> typedef struct DeadTuplesSegment
>>
>> {
>>
>> ItemPo
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Alexey Chernyshov
wrote:
> Thank you for the patch and benchmark results, I have a couple remarks.
> Firstly, padding in DeadTuplesSegment
>
> typedef struct DeadTuplesSegment
>
> {
>
> ItemPointerData last_dead_tuple;/* Copy of the last dead tuple
> (unse
Thank you for the patch and benchmark results, I have a couple remarks.
Firstly, padding in DeadTuplesSegment
typedef struct DeadTuplesSegment
{
ItemPointerData last_dead_tuple;/* Copy of the last dead tuple
(unset
* until the segment is fully
Resending without the .tar.bz2 that get blocked
Sorry for the delay, I had extended vacations that kept me away from
my test rigs, and afterward testing too, liteally, a few weeks.
I built a more thoroguh test script that produced some interesting
results. Will attach the results.
For now, to t