David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about making HASHes a first-class object?
I see less than zero value in this. You'd have to serialize the
contents to ship it to the client anyway, so there is no particular
point in inventing a random new representation for "row".
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 07:12:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IOW, their function resolution code treats a(int, int default 0)
> > as being equivalent to a(int) and a(int, int).
>
> So you are willing to prohibit a(int) from existing in parallel with
>
