PL/Lua (was: [HACKERS] plpython implementation)

2013-07-01 Thread Luis Carvalho
Hi all, Claudio Freire wrote: On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:29 AM, james ja...@mansionfamily.plus.com wrote: On 01/07/2013 02:43, Claudio Freire wrote: In essence, you'd have to use another implementation. CPython guys have left it very clear they don't intend to fix that, as they don't

Re: PL/Lua (was: [HACKERS] plpython implementation)

2013-07-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 18:15 -0400, Luis Carvalho wrote: The project is maintained -- I don't know how to say when something is well-maintained, but small frequency of code updates is not one of my criteria; The bug tracker contains bugs about build problems with PG 8.4, 9.2, and 9.3, which

Re: PL/Lua (was: [HACKERS] plpython implementation)

2013-07-01 Thread Luis Carvalho
Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 18:15 -0400, Luis Carvalho wrote: The project is maintained -- I don't know how to say when something is well-maintained, but small frequency of code updates is not one of my criteria; The bug tracker contains bugs about build problems with

Re: PL/Lua (was: [HACKERS] plpython implementation)

2013-07-01 Thread Andreas Karlsson
On 07/02/2013 01:54 AM, Luis Carvalho wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 18:15 -0400, Luis Carvalho wrote: The project is maintained -- I don't know how to say when something is well-maintained, but small frequency of code updates is not one of my criteria; The bug tracker