Re: pg_upgrade pain; was Re: [HACKERS] Why is time with timezone 12 bytes?

2010-09-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > decide to break it when we run into a feature that we really want that > > > can't be had any other way? If we want to make breaking on-disk > > > compatibility something that only happens every 5 years or so

Re: pg_upgrade pain; was Re: [HACKERS] Why is time with timezone 12 bytes?

2010-09-23 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 15:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > decide to break it when we run into a feature that we really want that > > can't be had any other way? If we want to make breaking on-disk > > compatibility something that only happens every 5 years or so, we had > > better give people -

pg_upgrade pain; was Re: [HACKERS] Why is time with timezone 12 bytes?

2010-09-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Robert Haas writes: > >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> Josh Berkus wrote: > It would be a good project to add to the list of "easy TODOs to get > started with." > > > >>> Except for