Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

2018-03-06 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
At Sat, 3 Mar 2018 09:46:11 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote in <7f1e5f2f-4902-2c29-de82-381de8cc6...@2ndquadrant.com> > On 3/1/18 23:39, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:27:13AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > >> If I understand correctly

Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

2018-03-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 3/1/18 23:39, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:27:13AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: >> If I understand correctly there's been no progress on this since, and >> there'd definitely need to be major work to get something we can agree >> upon. Doesn't seem v11 material. I think we

Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

2018-03-01 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:27:13AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > If I understand correctly there's been no progress on this since, and > there'd definitely need to be major work to get something we can agree > upon. Doesn't seem v11 material. I think we should mark this as returned > with

Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

2018-03-01 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2018-01-11 16:54:10 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > Thank you for the discussion. If I understand correctly there's been no progress on this since, and there'd definitely need to be major work to get something we can agree upon. Doesn't seem v11 material. I think we should mark this as

Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

2018-01-10 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Thank you for the discussion. # I didn't noticed that the license has been changed. At Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:35:27 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote in <4ab7546e-dd48-c985-2b26-e98d58920...@2ndquadrant.com> > > > On 12/30/2017 10:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andrew

Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

2017-12-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 12/30/2017 10:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan writes: >> As for out-dating, if we used DBD::PgPP we'd not be not in great danger >> there - it doesn't appear to have changed for many years - latest >> version is dated 2010. If we were to use it we'd

Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

2017-12-30 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > As for out-dating, if we used DBD::PgPP we'd not be not in great danger > there - it doesn't appear to have changed for many years - latest > version is dated 2010. If we were to use it we'd have a dependency on > DBI, but that in itself

Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

2017-12-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 12/29/2017 08:12 AM, Tels wrote: > On Thu, December 28, 2017 10:14 pm, Tom Lane wrote: >> Craig Ringer writes: >>> Another option might be to teach the TAP infrastructure and the >>> buildfarm >>> client how to fetch cpanminus and build DBD::Pg against our build-tree,

Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

2017-12-29 Thread Tels
On Thu, December 28, 2017 10:14 pm, Tom Lane wrote: > Craig Ringer writes: >> Another option might be to teach the TAP infrastructure and the >> buildfarm >> client how to fetch cpanminus and build DBD::Pg against our build-tree, >> so >> we could use Perl DBI. > > As a

Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

2017-12-28 Thread Tom Lane
Craig Ringer writes: > Another option might be to teach the TAP infrastructure and the buildfarm > client how to fetch cpanminus and build DBD::Pg against our build-tree, so > we could use Perl DBI. As a buildfarm owner, I'd take a *really* dim view of the buildfarm trying

Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

2017-12-28 Thread Craig Ringer
On 28 December 2017 at 16:31, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Hello. > > It would be useful if we have interactive sessions for TAP > tests. My first attempt was apparently unstable one that was > using psql. > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170720.152533.