I am trying to divide the buffer pool into 5 parts and i call these
clusters (different from postgres db clusters). What i want to do is to
make a mapping from the relations to these clusters. One relation belongs
to one cluster and a cluster can obviously have more than one relations. I
use a
Are any of these changes ready for CVS for 7.4?
---
Ed L. wrote:
I've been modifying dbmirror and wanted to offer my changes to anyone that
cared to experiment, FWIW. My effort is ongoing, the docs aren't perfect,
I
*Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through 300 messages
nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and
290 are trash ...
What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned?
---(end of
FEATURE(dnsbl,`korea.services.net',``Mail from ${client_addr} rejected by
korea.services.net'')dnl
FEATURE(dnsbl,`brazil.blackholes.us',``Mail from ${client_addr} rejected
by brazil.blackholes.us'')dnl
FEATURE(dnsbl,`opm.blitzed.org',``Mail from ${client_addr} rejected by
opm.blitzed.org'')dnl
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
*Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through 300 messages
nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and
290 are trash ...
What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned?
Avoid
Install SpamAssassin, and let it figure it out for you. It uses a whole list
of RBLs and uses them to score a message as spam, instead of just
blanket-denying messages from those SMTP servers. It works quite well.
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 01:41 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
*Way* off topic ...
Larry Rosenman wrote:
FEATURE(dnsbl,`korea.services.net',``Mail from ${client_addr}
rejected by korea.services.net'')dnl
FEATURE(dnsbl,`brazil.blackholes.us',``Mail from ${client_addr}
rejected by brazil.blackholes.us'')dnl
Yes, SPAM is really a problem here. Unfortunatelly, telco
Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite
nice. It puts all the borderline spam in a holding area and sends you a
daily email with all the topics / names listed and you can request those
out of the spam bucket. It's configurable to the extreme.
On Tue, 27 May
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
*Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through 300 messages
nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and
290 are trash ...
What are ppl using / trusting out
On Tue, 27 May 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:
Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite
nice. It puts all the borderline spam in a holding area and sends you a
daily email with all the topics / names listed and you can request those
out of the spam bucket. It's
(Moved to -hackers)
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you ok with the DB2 and draft-spec syntax of NEXT VALUE FOR (where
value is not a reserved word)? Or should I hold onto that until the
spec has gone through the final draft / release?
By that time we'll have done the
There's been some past speculation about putting in a function call
nesting depth limit, but I haven't been able to think of any reasonable
way to estimate a safe limit. The stack size limit varies a lot across
different platforms, and the amount of stack space consumed per PL
function call
Per user or site
I use Spamassassin AFTER the 4 RBL's and a personal fecal Roster.
--On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 21:31:45 -0300 The Hermit Hacker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:
Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite
nice.
Tilo Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane writes:
Looks like we either change plpython to untrusted status or remove it
entirely :-(. Sean, do you have time to prepare a patch for the former?
Please, don't remove it. We (a group of trusted people using Postgresql) are
actually
Hmm. Are you running the database in a non-C locale?
(pg_controldata would tell you.)
---
Here's the output of pg_controldata:
pg_control version number:72
Catalog version number: 200211021
Database cluster state: in production
pg_control last
Michael Brusser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but do you rule out any problems in Postgres code?
Never ... but when you're the only one reporting a problem, a local
issue is something to consider.
Is there a good explanation to why the same table loaded into another
Postgres
installation on the
On 2003-05-27 21:31:45, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
'K, I haven't found *that* feature yet ... can you do this on a per-user
basis as well, or is this a 'blanket, site wide' configuration ...
# When using the 'local:' quarantine method (default), the following
# applies:
#
# A finer control of
17 matches
Mail list logo
