On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:11 +0200, Michael Paesold wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Here's an updated WIP version of the LDC patch. I just spreads the
> > writes, that achieves the goal of smoothing the checkpoint I/O spikes. I
> > think sorting the writes etc. is interesting but falls in t
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> So, added to my plan
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00618.php)
> n) single encoded files. That will touch snowball, ispell, synonym, thesaurus
> and simple dictionaries
> n+1) use encoding names instead of locale's names in configuration
FYI,
All,
Where is the most current version of this patch? I want to test it on TPCE,
but there seem to be 4-5 different versions floating around, and the patch
tracker hasn't been updated.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
Tasneem,
> For example: For 6,
> the range defined by NEAR is: 4 – 8 For
> 2147,483,647, the range defined by NEAR is: 1717,986,917 –
> 2576,980,377 But yes, for other cases it may not give good results. We can
> give the option for the user to specify the m
A message entitled "Having Fun With PostgreSQL" was posted to Bugtraq
today. I haven't read through the paper yet so I don't know if the
author discusses security problems that need attention or if the
article is more like a compilation of "Stupid PostgreSQL Tricks."
http://www.securityfocus.com/
Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A message entitled "Having Fun With PostgreSQL" was posted to Bugtraq
> today. I haven't read through the paper yet so I don't know if the
> author discusses security problems that need attention or if the
> article is more like a compilation of "Stupid P
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> A message entitled "Having Fun With PostgreSQL" was posted to Bugtraq
> today. I haven't read through the paper yet so I don't know if the
> author discusses security problems that need attention or if the
> article is more like a compilation of "Stupid
I have completed my first pass over the tsearch documentation:
http://momjian.us/expire/fulltext/HTML/sql.html
They are from section 14 and following.
I have come up with a number of questions that I placed in SGML comments
in these files:
http://momjian.us/expire/fulltext/SGML/
On Friday 15 June 2007 13:29, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Umar Farooq wrote:
> > Surprisingly, no matter what type of query I execute, when I use strace
> > to monitor the system calls generated they turn out to be the same for
> > ALL sorts of queries.
>
> How are you calling strace?
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Gregory Stark wrote:
But what you're concerned about is not OLTP performance at all.
It's an OLTP system most of the time that periodically gets unexpectedly
high volume. The TPC-E OLTP test suite actually has a MarketFeed
component to in it that has similar properties
Josh Berkus wrote:
Where is the most current version of this patch? I want to test it on TPCE,
but there seem to be 4-5 different versions floating around, and the patch
tracker hasn't been updated.
It would be the ldc-justwrites-2.patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-06/
11 matches
Mail list logo
