On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
If this patch looks good now, can you mark it Ready for Committer in
the CommitFest app? If there are any remaining issues, please post a
further review.
while i'm not the reviewer this patch doesn't apply cleanly
Tom Lane wrote:
Applied with a moderate amount of editorialization.
Thank you!
Notably, I didn't
like what you'd done with the EvalPlanQual stuff, and after a bit of
reflection decided that the right thing was to teach EvalPlanQual to
execute just the desired subplan.
I didn't really like
Thom Brown thombr...@gmail.com writes:
Oh, I see. Yes, that is different. In which case, I'd still like to
see such a feature implemented as I imagine it could be useful for
auto-killing connections not being used that are continuously taking
some of the resources.
Did you try pgbouncer
2009/10/10 Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com
Thom Brown thombr...@gmail.com writes:
Oh, I see. Yes, that is different. In which case, I'd still like to
see such a feature implemented as I imagine it could be useful for
auto-killing connections not being used that are continuously
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
2009/10/7 Itagaki Takahiro itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp:
Also I added the following error checks before calling pgwin32_toUTF16()
(errordata_stack_depth ERRORDATA_STACK_SIZE - 1)
to avoid recursive errors, but I'm not sure it is really
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 01:15:58PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
What's the point of that? It can't be applied without documentation,
and it just makes life more complicated to have two separate patch
files floating around.
It's easier to write the documentation for all changes at once.
Michael Meskes írta:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 01:15:58PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
What's the point of that? It can't be applied without documentation,
and it just makes life more complicated to have two separate patch
files floating around.
It's easier to write the
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Because there are so many patches that are ready for committer review
already, and several more that will probably get there soon, it seems
likely that we will still have patches in that state on 10/15, the
nominal date
Jaime Casanova napsal(a):
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
If this patch looks good now, can you mark it Ready for Committer in
the CommitFest app? If there are any remaining issues, please post a
further review.
while i'm not the reviewer
On Oct 10, 2009, at 7:55 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
After some thought and reflection, I'm inclined to suggest that on
10/15 we move all the remaining patches to the next CommitFest,
declare this one closed, and stamp alpha2 on schedule.
+1, FWIW.
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo
