On Monday 22 February 2010 04:58:29 Tom Lane wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
+ Free(xldir);
s/Free/FreeDir ?
Yeah, that too. I think it's all good now, but please test.
At least I havent seen any of the problems pointed out in fsync fun.
One thing I was wondering
Heikki,
I had a quick look at the discussion on visibility map design. The
main differences as i see it are
a) IOT has both table and index in one structure. So no duplication of data
b) With visibility maps, we have three structures a) Table b) Index c)
Visibility map. So the disk
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 20:46 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
There is currently no way to run a separate daemon process that runs
user code as part of Postgres, so that the startup code gets run
immediately we startup, re-run if we crash and shut down
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Gokulakannan Somasundaram
gokul...@gmail.com wrote:
a) IOT has both table and index in one structure. So no duplication of data
b) With visibility maps, we have three structures a) Table b) Index c)
Visibility map. So the disk footprint of the same data will be
Forgot to include the group...
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Gokulakannan Somasundaram
gokul...@gmail.com wrote:
These sound like the same point to me. I don't think we're concerned
with footprint -- only with how much of that footprint actually needs
to be scanned. So if we have a
Fujii Masao wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
How about extending the format of the string returned by
pg_last_xlog_receive/replay_location() to include the timeline ID? When
it currently returns e.g '6/200016C', it could
Tom Lane wrote:
It is currently 22:21:59 EST here. At 21:50 I committed a fix to
copydir.c that cleaned up a couple of thinkos by Greg, including
a misspelling that had been making all the builds fail for several
hours. I went to see if any of the buildfarm had gone green yet,
and indeed
Greg Stark escribió:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Gokulakannan Somasundaram
gokul...@gmail.com wrote:
a) IOT has both table and index in one structure. So no duplication of data
b) With visibility maps, we have three structures a) Table b) Index c)
Visibility map. So the disk footprint
Pavel Stehule escribió:
Hello,
* Now I am working on migration of plpgpsm to plpgsql 9.0 base. I hope
so I understand SQL/PSM well so I am able to write production quality
implementation. If you like, I can integrate it to core. It can share
about 40-50% code with plpgpsm. The behave of
I just noticed that the current ALTER TABLE documentation doesn't do a
very good job differentiating between commands that affect the whole
table and commands that only affect specific columns.
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-altertable.html
That didn't matter as much before,
Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu writes:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I also think it should scan the todir not the fromdir, just on
general principles to avoid any possibility of race conditions.
I had concluded that scanning the original directory was odd
2010/2/22 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com:
Pavel Stehule escribió:
Hello,
* Now I am working on migration of plpgpsm to plpgsql 9.0 base. I hope
so I understand SQL/PSM well so I am able to write production quality
implementation. If you like, I can integrate it to core. It can
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 12:56 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 15:58 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Is there a good reason for $subject, other than that the code is
BTW, I notice that after allegedly fixing things, we are now seeing
fsync failures during CREATE DATABASE in the installcheck phase of
buildfarm runs on (apparently) all the Windows critters, plus a
couple of other platforms too. This mystifies me. I could believe
that there was something still
2010/2/20 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Chris Campbell chris_campb...@mac.com writes:
Is there a way to detect when the SSL library has renegotiation disabled?
Probably not. The current set of emergency security patches would
certainly
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
If so, shouldn't we try to disable renegotiation for all versions
*before* it was properly fixed?
If we could tell that, sure. But I don't believe there is any way to
identify whether a given installation of openssl has this patched.
Please don't
2010/2/22 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
If so, shouldn't we try to disable renegotiation for all versions
*before* it was properly fixed?
If we could tell that, sure. But I don't believe there is any way to
identify whether a given installation of
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
2010/2/22 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Red Hat's already shipping the patch. Dunno about other vendors.
Which patch? The one that breaks it, or the one that changes the protocol?
The one with the protocol change.
I think we already missed the
I just wonder why generate_series() is not allowed in GREATEST syntax.
Looking through execQual.c, almost all syntactic evaluations like
COALESCE, ARRAY[], ROW() doesn't allow set-value functions. Could
someone tell the underlying reason?
Also, using variadic functions introduced since 8.4, I
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:25:08 -0500, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
2010/2/22 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Red Hat's already shipping the patch. Dunno about other vendors.
Which patch? The one that breaks it, or the one that changes the
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
[...]
Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com writes:
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
Why not just use pgAgent? It's far more flexible than the design
you've suggested, and already exists.
What would it take to
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:00:33 +0100, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
We also have to consider our Windows users, where *we* ship the
OpenSSL library. Where there is no library we can ship right now that
fixes it.
We do? I mean I know that we provide the old 8.2/8.3 pginstaller, but
2010/2/22 Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:00:33 +0100, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
We also have to consider our Windows users, where *we* ship the
OpenSSL library. Where there is no library we can ship right now that
fixes it.
We do? I mean I
On Feb 22, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I think we already missed the window where it would have been sensible
to install a hack workaround for this. If we'd done that in November
it might have been reasonable, but by now it's too late for any hack
we install to spread much faster than
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 00:26 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 15:06 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
When I run ./configure, I get
(...warning..)
(If you are using the official distribution of PostgreSQL then you do
Josh Berkus wrote:
Yeah, they basically have semantics specified by the SQL standard that
are not compatible with anything else in GUC land. They are more like
SET LOCAL settings, but again not quite.
Mind you, transaction_isolation and transaction_read_only aren't
documented anywhere
Dave Page wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
Right. My complaint though, is that the docs imply that the info on
how those values get set is in the docs somewhere, which appears to be
incorrect.
The libpq
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
If you have downloaded a full copy of the source then
If you are building from a repository checkout ...
We don't need to use the word tarball, but we do need to say what we
mean. Anyway, its a seldom-used error message and I wouldn't have
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
If you have downloaded a full copy of the source then
If you are building from a repository checkout ...
We don't need to use the word tarball, but we do need to say what we
mean. Anyway, its a seldom-used error
2010/2/22 Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com:
I just wonder why generate_series() is not allowed in GREATEST syntax.
Looking through execQual.c, almost all syntactic evaluations like
COALESCE, ARRAY[], ROW() doesn't allow set-value functions. Could
someone tell the underlying reason?
Also,
Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
There is currently no way to run a separate daemon process that runs
user code as part of Postgres, so that the startup code gets run
immediately we startup, re-run if we crash and shut down cleanly
2010/2/22 Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com:
Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
There is currently no way to run a separate daemon process that runs
user code as part of Postgres, so that the startup code gets
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Jaime Casanova wrote:
so, is this idea (having some user processes be tied to postmaster
start/stop) going to somewhere?
I've added this to the TODO list. Now we just need someone to write it.
if
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
That doesn't mean it isn't a really good idea. It would be nice to have
a comprehensive job scheduling solution that allows me to continue
abstract away from external solutions and operating system dependencies.
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 18:45 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
2010/2/22 Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:00:33 +0100, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
We also have to consider our Windows users, where *we* ship the
OpenSSL library. Where there is no
Jaime Casanova wrote:
if we can do this, how should it work?
Simon said:
Yes, I think so. Rough design...
integrated_user_processes = 'x, y, z'
would run x(), y() and z() in their own processes. These would execute
after startup, or at consistent point in recovery. The code for these
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
we need those integrated processes at all when in a standby server?
Yes. You might want to run e.g. scheduled reports from a standby
reporting server, launched by a scheduler process. Or backups.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
That's too subtle. I wouldn't figure out what it means if my life
depended on it (then again, it doesn't).
Well, official made no sense. Bundled seemed similar enough to
tarball. What suggestion do you have?
tarball ?
--
Alvaro Herrera
On 2/22/10, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 18:45 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
2010/2/22 Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:00:33 +0100, Magnus Hagander
mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
We also have to consider our Windows
2010/2/22 Chris Campbell chris_campb...@mac.com:
On Feb 22, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I think we already missed the window where it would have been sensible
to install a hack workaround for this. If we'd done that in November
it might have been reasonable, but by now it's too late
2010/2/22 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
2010/2/22 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Red Hat's already shipping the patch. Dunno about other vendors.
Which patch? The one that breaks it, or the one that changes the protocol?
The one with the protocol
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
That's too subtle. I wouldn't figure out what it means if my life
depended on it (then again, it doesn't).
Well, official made no sense. Bundled seemed similar enough to
tarball. What suggestion do you have?
Jaime Casanova jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec writes:
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
API would be user_process_startup(), user_process_shutdown().
so it should be a GUC, that is settable only at start time.
we need those integrated processes at all when in a standby server?
This
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
2010/2/22 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
One way to deal with it would be to expose the whole renegotiation
setting as a user configuratble option. So they can set *when* we
renegotiate, which would also let
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I still haven't seen a good reason for not using cron or Task Scheduler
or other standard tools.
- marketing? don't you hate when people say: Oracle has it!?
- user dumbness: they forgot to start daemons they need (yes, i
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Jaime Casanova
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I still haven't seen a good reason for not using cron or Task Scheduler
or other standard tools.
- marketing? don't you hate when people
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Merlin Moncure escribió:
Like I noted above, what people want to schedule is going to be stored
procedures. Having both would virtually eliminate the need for
scripting outside the database, which is a pretty
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
With the attached patch, I have updated the message to use the wording
bundled distribution. I think the point about the snapshot tarballs
and official releases is that they are bundled rather than pulled via
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
With the attached patch, I have updated the message to use the wording
bundled distribution. I think the point about the snapshot tarballs
and official releases is that they are bundled
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
With the attached patch, I have updated the message to use the wording
bundled distribution. I think the point about the snapshot tarballs
and official releases is that they are bundled
Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com writes:
I just wonder why generate_series() is not allowed in GREATEST syntax.
Looking through execQual.c, almost all syntactic evaluations like
COALESCE, ARRAY[], ROW() doesn't allow set-value functions. Could
someone tell the underlying reason?
Laziness,
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Should we just go ahead and say official releases and daily snapshots?
Please just revert the patch.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Should we just go ahead and say official releases and daily snapshots?
Please just revert the patch.
So much for my trying to improve things. Reverted.
--
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
This seems like a solution in search of a problem to me. The most
salient aspect of such processes is that they would necessarily run
as the postgres user
I happen to run my PGQ tickers and londiste daemons as londiste user
and make it a superuser (at least
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I still haven't seen a good reason for not using cron or Task Scheduler
or other standard tools.
*) provided and popular feature in higher end databases
*) the audience you cater to expects it
*) IMO, it should simply not be
Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
This seems like a solution in search of a problem to me. The most
salient aspect of such processes is that they would necessarily run
as the postgres user
The precedent are archive and restore command. They
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Well, yeah, but you *must* trust those commands because every last bit
of your database content passes through their hands. That is not an
argument why you need to trust a scheduling facility --- much less the
tasks it schedules.
It seems to me that CREATE
Merlin Moncure escribió:
Like I noted above, what people want to schedule is going to be stored
procedures. Having both would virtually eliminate the need for
scripting outside the database, which is a pretty big deal since
external scripts are a real pain to keep cross platform. Since
On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
This seems like a solution in search of a problem to me. The most
salient aspect of
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
This patch removes a useless pushing of an active snapshot on
PortalStart. Instead of push/get/pop of the active snapshot, without
any intervening use of the active snapshot, we just pass a local
snapshot down to CreateQueryDesc.
Alvaro, what happened to this patch?
--
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
We have this para in the CREATE TABLE docs, commented out, as shown. It
seems to have been like that for a long time (see
http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml?annotate=1.48).
Surely we should either include it or remove
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
This seems like a solution in search of a problem to me. The most
salient aspect of such processes is that they would necessarily run
as the
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
This patch removes a useless pushing of an active snapshot on
PortalStart. Instead of push/get/pop of the active snapshot, without
any intervening use of the active snapshot, we just pass a local
snapshot down to CreateQueryDesc.
Alvaro, what
David Christensen wrote:
What are the semantics? If you launch a process and it crashes, is
the postmaster responsible for relaunching it? Is there any
additional monitoring of that process it would be expected to do?
What defined hooks/events would you want to launch these processes
from?
What happened to this patch? I don't see any objections, but it was not
applied.
---
Jim Cox wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Jim Cox escribi?:
Attached s/b a
Can someone work on a patch to implement the document changes suggested
below?
---
Jeff Davis wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:51 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
My renonc, please, try new patch. I forgot mark regproc.c file.
Added to TODO:
|Fix to_number() handling for values not matching the format string
---
Jeevan Chalke wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/21 Jeevan
Tom Lane wrote:
David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com writes:
On Sep 20, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, this is a long-standing generic issue, and not really hstore's
problem to fix.
So then does there need to be some documentation for how to deal with
this, for those doing
Tom Lane wrote:
Jeremy Kerr j...@ozlabs.org writes:
Stephen,
If the updated function is always faster when the overall string is at
least, say, 16 characters long,
But that's not the case - the cost of the function (and the speedup from
the previous version) depends on the number of
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Thinking about this again, I'm not sure this is a good idea. Using
curFileTLI makes sense if you're going to call pg_xlogfile_name() and
would expect it to return the filename of the file containing
Added to TODO:
|Add function to dump pg_depend information cleanly
---
Greg Smith wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, decibel wrote:
What might be more useful is a view that takes the guesswork out of using
Hi,
I'm wondering if we could detect a funcion has a side effect,
i.e. does a write to database. This is neccessary for pgpool to decide
if a qeury should to be sent to all of databases or not. If a query
includes functions which do writes to database, it should send the
query to all of
Hi,
it's safe to set synchrounous_commit to off in a pg_dump generated
script? if yes, would this help to the performance of restore a
database?
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
--
Sent
Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
VOLATILE functions such as random() and timeofday() apparently do not
write and sending those queries that include such functions is
overkill.
Can we VOLATILE property divide into two categories, say, VOLATILE
without write, and VOLATILE with write?
Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org writes:
I'm wondering if we could detect a funcion has a side effect,
i.e. does a write to database.
Currently we have three properties of functions: IMMUTABLE, STABLE and
VOLATILE. According to docs IMMUTABLE or STABLE functions do not write
to database.
Hi,
recovery.conf.sample has the following section for Hot Standby.
Is this still required?
#---
# HOT STANDBY PARAMETERS
#---
#
# If you want to
Gokulakannan Somasundaram gokul...@gmail.com wrote:
a) IOT has both table and index in one structure. So no duplication of data
b) With visibility maps, we have three structures a) Table b) Index c)
Visibility map. So the disk footprint of the same data will be higher in
postgres ( 2x + size
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Regarding hooks or events, I think postmaster should be kept simple:
launch at start, reset at crash recovery, kill at stop. Salt and pepper
allowed but that's about it -- more complex ingredients are out of the
question due to added code to
Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp writes:
Instead, how about excluding columns in primary keys from table data?
How will you implement select * from mytable ? Or even
select * from mytable where non_primary_key = something ?
If you can't do either of those without great expense, I
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
It will affect any dbname or username in mixed or upper case, not just
ALL, won't it?
No, I am suggesting to change only the comparisons to the literals
all, sameuser, samegroup and samerole.
What
Is this a TODO?
---
Josh Berkus wrote:
All,
I've grown to adore the new \ef function editor.
It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to add a view editor as
\ev. While editors would also be good for other
I assume this is not something we are supposed to apply.
---
Paul Matthews wrote:
Kevin Grittner wrote:
The first test seems unnecessary if you have the second.
x = 0, so x can't be zero unless y is, too.
Jaime Casanova jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
integrated_user_processes = 'x, y, z'
API would be user_process_startup(), user_process_shutdown().
FYI, pg_statsinfo version 2 emulates the same behavior with
shared_preload_libraries and spawn an user process in _PG_init().
But it's still
What happened to this? I didn't see it applied.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
OK, and how are we going to set that flag? Like I did, with a separate
function?
I would be inclined
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp writes:
Instead, how about excluding columns in primary keys from table data?
How will you implement select * from mytable ? Or even
select * from mytable where non_primary_key = something ?
Use index
Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp writes:
Instead, how about excluding columns in primary keys from table data?
How will you implement select * from mytable ? Or even
select * from
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Also, we're using the same technique for TOASTed values. The cost can be
compared with select * from mytable where toasted_value = something, no?
No, because toast pointers point in the direction you need to traverse.
AFAICS, this proposal involves
bruce wrote:
bruce wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
This was posted as a documentation comment:
to_char(interval '0d 0h 12m 44s', 'DD HH MI SS');
with HH and HH12 will return 12 instead of 0.
Testing on 8.4.1, it does seem to be the case that you get 00 12 12
44. Seems bogus to
Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Thinking about this again, I'm not sure this is a good idea. Using
curFileTLI makes sense if you're going to call pg_xlogfile_name() and
would expect it to return the filename of
Hi Tom,
On Tuesday 23 February 2010 06:37:26 Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
Any theories about what is happening?
Now, this doesn't mean that all is fine and dandy. I believe that a
majority of Unixen will reject attempts to open directories for writing,
so this solution puts us even further
90 matches
Mail list logo
