On 05/05/2011 09:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway m...@joeconway.com writes:
Right -- I think another similar problem exists in GetNewMultiXactId
where ExtendMultiXactOffset could succeed and write an XLOG entry and
then ExtendMultiXactMember could fail before advancing nextMXact. The
As I understood it's because we can't move root to another page.
Actually not. Path to node could change completely, For example, for page on
second level path is 0-234 (where 0 is a root page, 234 is a page on second
level). After root split path will be 0-new_page-234.
If algorithm could
Hackers,
I've run into a couple of occasions lately where I really wanted
pgstattuple on a production server in order to check table/index bloat.
However, in the production environment at a large site installing a
contrib module can involve a process which takes days or weeks.
Is there some
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 00:34, Josh Berkus josh.ber...@pgexperts.com wrote:
Hackers,
I've run into a couple of occasions lately where I really wanted
pgstattuple on a production server in order to check table/index bloat.
However, in the production environment at a large site installing a
2011/5/6 Teodor Sigaev teo...@sigaev.ru
As I understood it's because we can't move root to another page.
Actually not. Path to node could change completely, For example, for page
on second level path is 0-234 (where 0 is a root page, 234 is a page on
second level). After root split path
On 30.04.2011 01:04, Kevin Grittner wrote:
TRUNCATE TABLE and DROP TABLE should generate a rw-conflict *in* to
the enclosing transaction (if it is serializable) from all
transactions holding predicate locks on the table or its indexes.
Note that this could cause a transactions which is running
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 30.04.2011 01:04, Kevin Grittner wrote:
TRUNCATE TABLE and DROP TABLE should generate a rw-conflict *in*
to the enclosing transaction (if it is serializable) from all
transactions holding predicate locks on the table or its indexes.
Note that this could cause a
On 5 May 2011 21:05, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The major problem I'm aware of for getting rid of periodic wakeups is
the need for child processes to notice when the postmaster has died
unexpectedly. Your patch appears to degrade the archiver's response
time for that really
On Friday, May 06, 2011 04:30:01 AM Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
In my opinion this is actually a bug in 9.0. As its a (imo) low impact
fix thats constrained to two files it seems sensible to backpatch it now
that the solution
Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 5 May 2011 21:05, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The major problem I'm aware of for getting rid of periodic wakeups is
the need for child processes to notice when the postmaster has died
unexpectedly.
Could you please expand upon this? Why
I have just released version 4.5 of the buildfarm client.
Notable features and improvements include:
* Suppport for building docs
* Support running optional steps
* Make SCM module totally generic so it can be used for things other
than PostgreSQL core.
* Run isolation checks.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Could you please expand upon this? Why is it of any consequence if the
archiver notices that the postmaster is dead after 60 seconds rather
than after 1? So control in the archiver is going to stay in its event
loop
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Could you please expand upon this? Why is it of any consequence if the
archiver notices that the postmaster is dead after 60 seconds rather
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
a small cache that remembers the commit/cancel status of recently
seen transactions.
How is
Em 06-05-2011 05:06, Magnus Hagander escreveu:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 00:34, Josh Berkusjosh.ber...@pgexperts.com wrote:
Hackers,
I've run into a couple of occasions lately where I really wanted
pgstattuple on a production server in order to check table/index bloat.
However, in the
First, I want to apologize if this is a topic for one of the
other mailing lists (or completely inappropriate for PostgreSQL mailing lists),
but I looked them over, and this one seemed most appropriate.
I am working on a project based on TelegraphCQ 2.1
Em 06-05-2011 02:14, Nick Raj escreveu:
I am using postgresql-8.4.6. I want to debug the contrib/cube code. Can
we able to debug that cube code? Because there is no .configure file
to enable debug. Is there is any way to change make file to enable debug?
What do you want to debug? AFAICS you
On 01/05/11 21:16, Joshua Berkus wrote:
Speaking of which, what happened to replacing GEQO with Simulated Annealing?
Where did that project go?
It stayed on github (https://github.com/wulczer/saio) and stagnated a
bit after I got my degree. It's on the top of my list of things to pick
up
2011/5/6 Krešimir Križanović kresimir.krizano...@fer.hr:
I don't know what to do with this backend interface. I would like to get a
postmaster running and to connect to a data base with psql. However, when i
try to start psql, it says that there is no postmaster running.
I would not assume
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, I was thinking that it'd be better to pull it out of
GetNewTransactionId and put it in a higher level.
As long as it is always called when an xid is assigned. Since this
function appears to be on the only path to
Hi,
I revised the patch against HEAD, it's available at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/postgres/buffer-cache-hibernation-postgresql-20110506.patch
Implemented hibernation file validations:
- comparison with pg_control
At shutdown:
pg_control state should be DB_SHUTDOWNED.
At startup
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
After some thought I did this instead:
Thanks! I can see why that's better.
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 18:22, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
eu...@timbira.com wrote:
Em 06-05-2011 05:06, Magnus Hagander escreveu:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 00:34, Josh Berkusjosh.ber...@pgexperts.com
wrote:
Hackers,
I've run into a couple of occasions lately where I really wanted
pgstattuple
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 18:22, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
eu...@timbira.com wrote:
Em 06-05-2011 05:06, Magnus Hagander escreveu:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 00:34, Josh Berkusjosh.ber...@pgexperts.com
wrote:
Hackers,
On 05/06/2011 01:55 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
Once we got AIX running a buildfarm node, that led to getting *ALL* of
contrib working there, and I'm pretty sure that similar happened with
other platforms at around the same time (I'm thinking this was 7.4,
but it might have been 8.0)
FYI,
Em 06-05-2011 14:55, Christopher Browne escreveu:
The improvement
would come from drawing contrib a bit closer to core, and encouraging
packagers (dpkg, rpm, ports) to fold contrib into base rather than
separating it. I'm sure that would get some pushback, though.
I'm in favor of find out
On a not unrelated point, I still haven't seen any mention of this deal
in pgsql-hackers, and I really think that presenting it to them as a
fait accompli would be a Seriously Bad Idea.
I wanted a list of initial board members before I presented it.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
On 5/6/11 11:29 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On a not unrelated point, I still haven't seen any mention of this deal
in pgsql-hackers, and I really think that presenting it to them as a
fait accompli would be a Seriously Bad Idea.
I wanted a list of initial board members before I presented it.
Krešimir Križanović wrote:
However, where I compile and run the project, in the Eclipse console I
get:
POSTGRES backend interactive interface
$Revision: 1.115 $ $Date: 2006/02/06 01:19:46 $
I don’t know what to do with this backend interface. I would like to
get a postmaster running and
Christopher Browne wrote:
I'm getting paper cuts quite a bit these days over the differences
between what different packaging systems decide to install. The one
*I* get notably bit on, of late, is that I have written code that
expects to have pg_config to do some degree of self-discovery, only
Hackers, Community members:
As some of you already know, several important community assets are held
in the personal name of Marc Fournier for historical reasons. These
assets include several DNS domains (including postgresql.org), our SSL
key, and a Canadian trademark, and possibly a server as
Josh,
This would imply improvement in the terms of the U.S. embargo on Cuba.
What would be real beneficial to all regional communities.
--
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
Edificio Beijing. Miramar Trade Center. Etecsa.
Miramar, La Habana.Cuba.
---
This message was processed by Kaspersky Mail
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Christopher Browne wrote:
I'm getting paper cuts quite a bit these days over the differences
between what different packaging systems decide to install. The one
*I* get notably bit on, of late, is that I have written code
On 05/06/2011 03:14 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Greg Smithg...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Christopher Browne wrote:
I'm getting paper cuts quite a bit these days over the differences
between what different packaging systems decide to install. The one
*I* get
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 21:19, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/06/2011 03:14 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Greg Smithg...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Christopher Browne wrote:
I'm getting paper cuts quite a bit these days over the differences
Just a thought: To make things a bit easier, the bindir options of
pg_upgrade (-b/-B, --old-bindir/--new-bindir) could be made optional, I
think. The new bindir should normally be the one that pg_upgrade itself
is in. And the old bindir could be found out by looking at the
postmaster.opts file
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Gilberto Castillo Martínez
gilberto.casti...@etecsa.cu wrote:
Josh,
This would imply improvement in the terms of the U.S. embargo on Cuba.
What would be real beneficial to all regional communities.
I wouldn't get overly optimistic about that - the purpose of
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
We have, however, come up with a potential plan to change this. Marc
has agreed to transfer the community assets to a new Canadian nonprofit
which we set up for the purpose. The PostgreSQL Core Team supports this
solution,
On 05/06/2011 03:30 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
If the corporation became *really active* in extra senses (e.g. -
handling donations, operating events), that would add some Canadian
activity that doesn't exist today, but it's not clear that it would
necessarily get really active that way.
Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Gilberto Castillo Martínez
gilberto.casti...@etecsa.cu wrote:
This would imply improvement in the terms of the U.S. embargo on Cuba.
I wouldn't get overly optimistic about that - the purpose of this is a
bit less
2011/5/6 Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com:
Hackers, Community members:
As some of you already know, several important community assets are held
in the personal name of Marc Fournier for historical reasons. These
assets include several DNS domains (including postgresql.org), our SSL
key, and a
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 21:19, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/06/2011 03:14 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
If there's a server package and a client package, it likely only
fits with the server package. On a host where only the client
On 05/06/2011 04:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagandermag...@hagander.net writes:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 21:19, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/06/2011 03:14 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
If there's a server package and a client package, it likely only
fits with the server
Excerpts from Darren Duncan's message of mié may 04 15:33:33 -0300 2011:
I see VARIANT/ANYTYPE as the most general case of supporting union types,
which,
say, could have more specific examples of allow any number or date here but
nothing else. If VARIANT is supported, unions in general
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Just a thought: To make things a bit easier, the bindir options of
pg_upgrade (-b/-B, --old-bindir/--new-bindir) could be made optional, I
think. The new bindir should normally be the one that pg_upgrade itself
is in. And the old bindir could be found
On 05/06/2011 04:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Darren Duncan's message of mié may 04 15:33:33 -0300 2011:
I see VARIANT/ANYTYPE as the most general case of supporting union types, which,
say, could have more specific examples of allow any number or date here but
nothing else.
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Darren Duncan's message of mié may 04 15:33:33 -0300 2011:
I see VARIANT/ANYTYPE as the most general case of supporting union types,
which,
say, could have more specific examples of allow any number or date here but
nothing
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/06/2011 04:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Darren Duncan's message of mié may 04 15:33:33 -0300 2011:
I see VARIANT/ANYTYPE as the most general case of supporting union types,
which,
say, could have
Thanks for the help, that is the problem I think. However, I didn’t
manage to test it yet. When I compile the project in Eclipse, I get postgres
executable, but not the postmaster. I found somewhere on the net that
postmaster and postgres are actually the same program, and when Install
On 05/05/2011 05:06 AM, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
In summary, PgFincore's target is File System Buffer Cache, Buffer
Cache Hibernation's target is DB Buffer Cache(shared buffers).
Right. The thing to realize is that shared_buffers is becoming a
smaller fraction of the total RAM used by the
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié may 04 17:14:25 -0300 2011:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
It's not clear to me whether in any of this there is a solution to the
problem of int2 being a second-class citizen.
I've always felt that the basic problem int2 has got is that
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
Another question:
To address the problem in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg02097.php
, should we just clear the vm before the log of insert/update/delete?
This may reduce
Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com writes:
But people are evidently still setting packaging policies based on how
things were back in 7.3, even though that perhaps isn't necessary
anymore.
FWIW, once you get past the client versus server distinction, I think
most subpackaging decisions are
2011/5/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Perhaps it would be adequate to allow automatic resolution of an
overloading conflict only when one of the available alternatives
dominates all others, ie, none of the argument positions requires a
longer distance cast than is used in that position by any
Thanks for picking up on my mentioning union types; I wasn't sure if anyone did.
Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/06/2011 04:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Darren Duncan's message of mié may 04 15:33:33 -0300
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 05/05/2011 05:06 AM, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
In summary, PgFincore's target is File System Buffer Cache, Buffer
Cache Hibernation's target is DB Buffer Cache(shared buffers).
Right. The thing to realize is that
All,
We might get somewhere by trying to identify a small set of particularly
popular contrib modules that don't add any extra dependencies, and then
recommending to packagers that those ones get bundled into the main
server package.
Yeah, I wasn't thinking of including all of contrib.
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
2011/5/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Perhaps it would be adequate to allow automatic resolution of an
overloading conflict only when one of the available alternatives
dominates all others, ie, none of the argument positions requires a
longer distance
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Yeah, I wasn't thinking of including all of contrib. There's a lot of
reasons not to do that.
Slightly off-topic, but I really think we would benefit from trying to
divide up contrib. Right now it's a mixture of (a)
To follow-up, an additional feature that would be useful and resembles union
types is the variant where you could declare a union type first and then
separately other types could declare they are a member of the union. I'm
talking about loosely what mixins or type-roles or interfaces etc are
2011/5/6 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
2011/5/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Perhaps it would be adequate to allow automatic resolution of an
overloading conflict only when one of the available alternatives
dominates all others, ie, none of the
On 05/06/2011 05:58 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Yeah, I wasn't thinking of including all of contrib. There's a lot of
reasons not to do that. I was asking about pgstattuple in particular,
since it's:
(a) small
(b) has no external dependancies
(c) adds no stability risk or performance overhead
(d) is
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Yeah, I wasn't thinking of including all of contrib. There's a lot of
reasons not to do that.
Slightly off-topic, but I really think we would benefit from trying to
divide up
On 5/6/11 3:19 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Slightly off-topic, but I really think we would benefit from trying to
divide up contrib.
I don't agree, unless by divide up you mean move several things to
extensions.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via
These are the only ones I'd care about moving into a more likely place.
The rest of the contrib modules are the sort where if you need them, you
realize that early and get them installed. These are different by
virtue of their need popping up most often during emergencies. The fact
that I
I found a few misdescriptions at SECURITY LABEL documentation.
It might come from the COMMENT ON page.
The attached patch will fix them.
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei kai...@kaigai.gr.jp
pgsql-fix-security-label-doc.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Kresimir,
Concerning TelegraphCQ, my aim is to add geospatial capabilities, to
actually merge it with PostGIS. Its a part of my PhD Thesis.
Hmmm. Given that the TCQ code was never production quality in the first
place (i.e. crashed every 60 minutes), this seems like kind of a futile
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I use pgstattuple, pageinspect, pg_freespacemap, and pg_buffercache
regularly enough that I wish they were more common. Throw in pgrowlocks and
you've got the whole group Robert put into the debug set. It makes me sad
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie may 06 17:11:35 -0300 2011:
As an example, the proposed defaults would be not only wrong, but
disastrous in the perfectly-reasonable situation where the user has
moved the old installation aside and then installed the new executables
in the same place
Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of vie may 06 15:41:02 -0300 2011:
We have, however, come up with a potential plan to change this. Marc
has agreed to transfer the community assets to a new Canadian nonprofit
which we set up for the purpose. The PostgreSQL Core Team supports this
Hi, thanks for your comments!
I'm glad to discuss about this topic.
* pgfadv_WILLNEED
* pgfadv_WILLNEED_snapshot
The former ask to load each segment of a relation *but* the kernel can
decide to not do that or load only part of each segment. (so it is not
as brutal as cat file /dev/null
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
As a packager, what I'd really want to see from a division into
recommended and not-so-recommended packages is that they get installed
into different subdirectories by make install. Then I could just
point RPM at those
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
As a packager, what I'd really want to see from a division into
recommended and not-so-recommended packages is that they get installed
into different subdirectories by make install.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
I found a few misdescriptions at SECURITY LABEL documentation.
It might come from the COMMENT ON page.
The attached patch will fix them.
Good catch. Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
As a packager, what I'd really want to see from a division into
recommended and not-so-recommended packages is that
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Dan Ports d...@csail.mit.edu wrote:
While running some benchmarks to test SSI performance, I found a
race condition that's capable of causing a segfault. A patch is
attached.
The bug is in
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Jan14, 2011, at 17:45 , Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
I gather that the behaviour we want is for normal backends to exit
once the postmaster is gone, and for
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson
joh...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to add support for cross compiled PGXS modules to the
build system?
That is, when PG is cross compiled, a host-triplet-pg_config is
also built for use with external modules?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Yves Weißig
weis...@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de wrote:
Hi list,
currently I am obtaining a new block at the end of an index with:
buf = ReadBuffer(rel, P_NEW);
but it throws:
ERROR: unexpected data beyond EOF in block 0 of relation base/11874/156053
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Dan Ports d...@csail.mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 06:45:54PM +0200, Robert Haas wrote:
Yeah, I think Dan's notes about memory ordering would be good to include.
I left it out initially because I didn't want to make things more
confusing. As far as
2011/4/30 Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz:
I've been digging in the sources, and I've noticed the MaxOffsetNumber
is defined (in storage/off.h) like this
(BLCKSZ / sizeof(ItemIdData))
I guess it might be made a bit more precise by subtracting the header
like this
(BLCKSZ -
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
This is related to the SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock
thread, but seemed different enough to merit spinning off a new
thread.
Our shop hasn't used large objects so far because of the lack of
security
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Leonardo Francalanci m_li...@yahoo.it wrote:
Maybe you should change xl_act_commit to have a separate list of rels to
drop the init fork for (instead of mixing those with the list of files to
drop as a whole).
I tried to follow your suggestion, thank you
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
ERROR: constraints on permanent tables may reference only permanent tables
HINT: constraint %s
Argh, hit send too soon.
HINT: constraint %s references table %s
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Leonardo Sápiras sapi...@faccat.br wrote:
A copy of my proposal can be found at
[http://fit.faccat.br/~leonardo/gsoc_proposal.html]. But I will put a
copy of this in another place. So, what would be better? Put on the
PostgreSQL Wiki
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On Friday, May 06, 2011 04:30:01 AM Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
In my opinion this is actually a bug in 9.0. As its a (imo) low impact
fix thats constrained
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:35:39PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Why does this HASH_FIND the applicable hash table entries and then
HASH_REMOVE it as a separate step, instead of just HASH_REMOVE-ing it
in one go?
For PredicateLockHash, we need to find the lock entry first so that we
can call
Hi Greg,
So my exams are over now and am fully committed to the project in terms of
time. I have started compiling a sort of personal todo for myself. I agree
with your advice to start the project with small steps first. (I have a copy
of the code and am trying to glean as much of it as I can)
I
88 matches
Mail list logo
