Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The name of this new option is a bit of a mouthful, and it mixes in
an otherwise standardized term (deferrable, as in constraints) with
transaction isolation. Wouldn't something like
--wait-for-serializable be clearer (and shorter)?
I see it's not mentioned in the
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
On a separate note though, Simon, I don't know what you mean by we
normally start with a problem. It's an free software project and
people are free to work on whatever interests them whether that's
because it solves a problem
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
MauMau maumau...@gmail.com writes:
MauMau maumau...@gmail.com writes:
I've encountered one problem on Windows. I need to support running all of
my
products on one host simultaneously. Plus, I need to log messages in
(2011/04/26 5:42), Robert Haas wrote:
OK. Turned out a little more cleanup was needed to make this all the
way consistent with how we handle views; I have now done that.
I noticed that some fixes would be needed for consistency about foreign
table privileges. Attached patch includes fixes
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Greg Stark wrote:
On a separate note though, Simon, I don't know what you mean by we
normally start with a problem. It's an free software project and
people are free to work on whatever interests them whether that's
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
So, what do we need in order to find our way to index-only scans?
1. The visibility map needs to be crash-safe. The basic idea of
index-only scans is that, instead of checking the heap to find out
Hi,
I was trying to create a trigger with parameters. I've found a potential bug
when the param is boolean.
Here is code replicating the bug:
CREATE TABLE x(x TEXT);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION trigger_x() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
RETURN NEW;
END; $$ LANGUAGE PLPGSQL;
CREATE TRIGGER
On 9 May 2011 11:19, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
In the child, spawn a thread
How exactly should I go about this? The one place in the code that I
knew to use multiple threads, pgbench, falls back on emulation with
fork() on some platforms.
--
Peter Geoghegan
On 10.05.2011 20:15, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Simon Riggssi...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This topic has been discussed many times, yet I have never seen an
assessment that explains WHY we would want to do index-only
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:52, Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 9 May 2011 11:19, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
In the child, spawn a thread
How exactly should I go about this? The one place in the code that I
knew to use multiple threads,
Hi,
I was trying to create a trigger with parameters. I've found a potential
bug
when the param is boolean.
Here is code replicating the bug:
CREATE TABLE x(x TEXT);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION trigger_x() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
RETURN NEW;
END; $$ LANGUAGE PLPGSQL;
On 11 May 2011 10:56, t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to create a trigger with parameters. I've found a potential
bug
when the param is boolean.
Here is code replicating the bug:
CREATE TABLE x(x TEXT);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION trigger_x() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
På onsdag 11. mai 2011 kl 10:56:19 skrev t...@fuzzy.cz:
Hi,
I was trying to create a trigger with parameters. I've found a potential
bug
when the param is boolean.
Here is code replicating the bug:
CREATE TABLE x(x TEXT);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION trigger_x() RETURNS TRIGGER
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 11:01:56 AM Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
På onsdag 11. mai 2011 kl 10:56:19 skrev t...@fuzzy.cz:
CREATE TRIGGER trig_x_bool BEFORE INSERT ON x FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE
PROCEDURE
trigger_x(true);
The docs clearly state what the valid values are and the literal
On 07.05.2011 16:48, Robert Haas wrote:
I was able to reproduce something very like this in unpatched master,
just by letting recovery pause at a named restore point, and then
resuming it.
LOG: recovery stopping at restore point stop, time 2011-05-07
09:28:01.652958-04
LOG: recovery has
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 11:21:34 AM Andres Freund wrote:
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 11:01:56 AM Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
På onsdag 11. mai 2011 kl 10:56:19 skrev t...@fuzzy.cz:
CREATE TRIGGER trig_x_bool BEFORE INSERT ON x FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE
PROCEDURE
trigger_x(true);
On 11 May 2011 11:01, Andreas Joseph Krogh andr...@officenet.no wrote:
På onsdag 11. mai 2011 kl 10:56:19 skrev t...@fuzzy.cz:
Hi,
I was trying to create a trigger with parameters. I've found a
potential
bug
when the param is boolean.
Here is code replicating the bug:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 11:32:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
To be concrete, consider the function array_append(anyarray, anyelement)
yielding anyarray. Suppose we have a domain D over int[] and the call
array_append(var_of_type_D, 42). If we automatically downcast the
variable to int[], should
2011/5/11, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
FYI, because the visibility map is only one _bit_ per page, it is 8000 *
8 or 64k times smaller than the heap, e.g. one 8k page covers 64MB of
heap pages.
Actually, that would be one 8kB block covers 512MB of heap: 1 block
of visibility map (8kB) =
P onsdag 11. mai 2011 kl 11:30:51 skrev Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com:
On 11 May 2011 11:01, Andreas Joseph Krogh andr...@officenet.no wrote:
P onsdag 11. mai 2011 kl 10:56:19 skrev t...@fuzzy.cz:
Hi,
I was trying to create a trigger with parameters. I've found a potential
bug
when
On 11.05.2011 08:29, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I was able to reproduce something very like this in unpatched master,
just by letting recovery pause at a named restore point, and then
resuming it.
I was able to reproduce the
2011/5/11 Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com:
On 10.05.2011 20:15, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Simon Riggssi...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This topic has been discussed many times, yet I have never
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 11:50:35 AM Szymon Guz wrote:
On 11 May 2011 11:29, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 11:21:34 AM Andres Freund wrote:
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 11:01:56 AM Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
På onsdag 11. mai 2011 kl 10:56:19 skrev
2011/5/10 Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The typical speed up for non-covered indexes will come when we
access a very large table (not in cache) via an index scan that is
smaller than a bitmapindex scan. Will we be able to gauge
On 11 May 2011 12:06, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
Why do you wan't to use a boolean directly if you can't use it as the type
itself anyway?
Yep, and this is a really good point :)
I wanted to have consistent api, so use true when I have a boolean value.
I will use 'true' and add
On 11 May 2011 09:54, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
If you're doing this Win32 specific, take a look at
src/backend/port/win32/signal.c for an example.
If you're not doing this win32-specific, I doubt we really want
threads to be involved...
Well, that seems to be the
On 11.05.2011 13:34, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On 11 May 2011 09:54, Magnus Hagandermag...@hagander.net wrote:
If you're doing this Win32 specific, take a look at
src/backend/port/win32/signal.c for an example.
If you're not doing this win32-specific, I doubt we really want
threads to be
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
So, what do we need in order to find our way to index-only scans?
1. The visibility map needs to be crash-safe. The basic idea of
index-only scans is that, instead of checking the heap to find out
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
That will be true only if you intentionally ignore the points Greg
raised. If the table isn't entirely ALL_VISIBLE, then the choice of
index will determine the ordering of the actual table probes that occur.
There could be
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I think we can just always call ShutdownWalRcv(). It should be gone if the
server was promoted while streaming, but that's just an implementation
detail of what the promotion code does. There's no
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Completely agree, but why are you saying that to me?
When Tom asks me why I suggest something, nobody tells him its a free
software project etc
What is the difference here?
We're now 40 emails in this thread, and
From: Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
BTW, what will this accomplish exactly that couldn't be accomplished by
setting log_line_prefix to include the desired identifier?
Windows uses the event source field to show where events in
On 11.05.2011 14:16, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
I think we can just always call ShutdownWalRcv(). It should be gone if the
server was promoted while streaming, but that's just an implementation
detail of
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Joseph Adams
joeyadams3.14...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me a reasonable way to implement VARIANT would be to have
a data type called VARIANT that stores an OID of the inner type at the
beginning, followed by the binary data.
That's likely to be how it gets
typecmds.c says:
Domains over composite types might be made to work in the future, but
not today.
Attached is a patch that allows domains over composite types, together
with test cases in domaincomp.sql. A domain over a composite type has
typtype TYPTYPE_DOMAIN, but typrelid and typrelkind
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I see: here's a comment that was throwing me off:
+ /*
+* If we didn't get the lock and it turns out we need it, we'll
have to
On 05/11/2011 07:53 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Joseph Adams
joeyadams3.14...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me a reasonable way to implement VARIANT would be to have
a data type called VARIANT that stores an OID of the inner type at the
beginning, followed by the
Nicolas Barbier wrote:
2011/5/11, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
FYI, because the visibility map is only one _bit_ per page, it is 8000 *
8 or 64k times smaller than the heap, e.g. one 8k page covers 64MB of
heap pages.
Actually, that would be one 8kB block covers 512MB of heap: 1
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Greg Stark wrote:
On a separate note though, Simon, I don't know what you mean by we
normally start with a problem. It's an free software project and
people are free to work on whatever interests
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 11:32:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
So we basically had three alternatives to make it better:
* downcast to the array type, which would possibly silently
break applications that were relying on the function result
C?dric Villemain wrote:
2011/5/10 Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The typical speed up for non-covered indexes will come when we
access a very large table (not in cache) via an index scan that is
smaller than a bitmapindex scan. Will we
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
So this is fine if the
current value was from the file or was the boot_val, but if we'd
overridden the boot value with a replacement default value using
PGC_S_DEFAULT, that code would cause the value to revert to the boot_val
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
The very fact that Kevin and yourself bring up different reasons
for why we need this feature makes me nervous.
Yes, no question. For count(*), you don't care about the indexed
values, only the count, while for Kevin's case you are reading
values
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On 10.05.2011 20:15, Simon Riggs wrote:
I can picture that. Regrettably, I can also picture the accesses to
the visibility map, the maintenance operations on the VM that are
needed for this and the contention that both of those
I have found a small but annoying bug in libpq where
connection parameters are resolved via LDAP.
There is a write past the end of a malloc'ed string which causes
memory corruption. The code and the bug are originally by me :^(
The attached patch fixes the problem in HEAD.
This should be
Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On 10.05.2011 20:15, Simon Riggs wrote:
I can picture that. Regrettably, I can also picture the accesses to
the visibility map, the maintenance operations on the VM that are
needed for this and the contention
Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu writes:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
So this is fine if the
current value was from the file or was the boot_val, but if we'd
overridden the boot value with a replacement default value using
PGC_S_DEFAULT, that code would cause
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to know if this is a strategy that merits further work...If
anybody has time/interest that is. It's getting close to the point
where I
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
That's likely to be how it gets implemented, but you seem to have
missed the point of some of the discussion upthread: the big problem
with that is that someone might type DROP TYPE foo, and when they
do, you need an
Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at writes:
I have found a small but annoying bug in libpq where
connection parameters are resolved via LDAP.
There is a write past the end of a malloc'ed string which causes
memory corruption. The code and the bug are originally by me :^(
Hmm ... that's a
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think Simon's point is that showing a gain on specific test
cases isn't a sufficient argument.
Ah, if that's what he's been trying to get at, I'm curious who
disagrees with that. I wouldn't have thought anyone on this list
would.
What we need to know
Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of mar may 10 17:57:20 -0400 2011:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org
wrote:
both Oracle and MS-SQL have it
Do they? What types are they called?
ANYTYPE
--
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com
The PostgreSQL
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Joseph Adams
joeyadams3.14...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Darren Duncan dar...@darrenduncan.net
wrote:
Examples of open union types could be number, which all the numeric types
compose, and so you can know say that you can use the
... btw, shouldn't this function free the result string when it's done
with it? AFAICS that string is not returned to the caller, it's just
being leaked.
(I'll refrain from asking why it's creating the string in the first
place rather than parsing ldap_get_values_len's output as-is ...)
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I need to test is how much benefit you'll see with wider records.
The results are a bit better, around 25% using a similar methodology
on ~ 1k wide records.
I think I'm gonna revert the change to cache invalid
Fujii, Simon,
For 9.1, both master and replica in a sync replication relationship are
required to be fsync'ing to disk. I understand why we had to do that
for our first cut at synch rep. Do you think, though, that it might
become possible to replicate without synch-to-disk for 9.2?
The use
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
For 9.1, both master and replica in a sync replication relationship are
required to be fsync'ing to disk. I understand why we had to do that
for our first cut at synch rep. Do you think, though, that it might
become
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
The grammar accepts only a very limited amount of parameters there:
Err
TriggerFuncArg:
Iconst
{
char buf[64];
snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), %d, $1);
$$ =
It's already possible to set fsync=off on the standby if you want. If
there is an OS-level crash you'll need to rebuild the standby, but in
some cases that may be acceptable.
Yes, generally if there's an OS-level crash on cloud hosting, you've
lost the instance anyway.
And Simon has
pg_upgrade is a bit schizophrenic concerning the PGPORT environment
variable. On the one hand, there is this code in option.c that wants to
make use of it:
old_cluster.port = getenv(PGPORT) ? atoi(getenv(PGPORT)) : DEF_PGPORT;
new_cluster.port = getenv(PGPORT) ? atoi(getenv(PGPORT)) :
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
Following are results that are fairly typical of the benefits you
might see when the optimization kicks in. The attached benchmark just
[hbcache]
real 3m35.549s
[HEAD]
real 4m24.216s
These numbers look very
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
pg_upgrade is a bit schizophrenic concerning the PGPORT environment
variable. On the one hand, there is this code in option.c that wants to
make use of it:
old_cluster.port = getenv(PGPORT) ? atoi(getenv(PGPORT)) : DEF_PGPORT;
new_cluster.port =
On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 07:25:58 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
The grammar accepts only a very limited amount of parameters there:
Err
TriggerFuncArg:
Iconst
{
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
It's already possible to set fsync=off on the standby if you want. If
there is an OS-level crash you'll need to rebuild the standby, but in
some cases that may be acceptable.
... The one other thing would be the
ability not to fsync the master, which
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
Is there a special reason for not using the normal function calling
mechanisms? It looks to me as it was just done to have an easy way to store
it
in pg_trigger.tgargs.
Well, this is all very historical, dating from Berkeley days AFAIK.
If we had it
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
A larger question is whether we should just disable all the checks for
environment variables. The C comment says:
* check_for_libpq_envvars()
*
* tests whether any libpq environment variables are set.
* Since pg_upgrade connects to both the old
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
A larger question is whether we should just disable all the checks for
environment variables. The C comment says:
* check_for_libpq_envvars()
*
* tests whether any libpq environment variables are set.
* Since pg_upgrade
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
Following are results that are fairly typical of the benefits you
might see when the optimization kicks in. The attached benchmark just
Why not? Is there a fundamental problem, or just that no one wanted to
make it work?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Or you could just unsetenv instead of complaining.
+1 for that.
I would like to think that eventually pg_upgrade won't start a
postmaster at all, but connect using something more like a standalone
backend. So someday the
Robert,
That WAL has effectively disappeared from the
master, but is still present on the slave. Now the master comes up
and starts processing read-write transactions again, and generates a
new and different 1kB of WAL. Hilarity ensues, because the two
machines are now out of step
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:39, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Late reply, but we are basically ignoring 'local' lines if the build
doesn't support unix domain sockets (windows), but throwing an error for
hostssl usage if ssl is not compiled in. Is
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Why not? Is there a fundamental problem, or just that no one wanted to
make it work?
I'm fairly sure there was a substantive issue, but memory fails as to
what it was. You could try removing the error check and see what
breaks ...
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Joseph Adams
joeyadams3.14...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Darren Duncan dar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
Examples of open union types could be number, which all the numeric types
compose, and so you can know say that you
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:22:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 11:32:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
So we basically had three alternatives to make it better:
* downcast to the array type, which would possibly silently
break
To follow-up my earlier comments ...
I suspect for practical purposes we may want to limit the scope of some type
features.
For example, the greatest benefits for open union / mixin types is with
routines/operators, not so much with tables.
So, Pg could choose to support open unions but
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Yeb Havinga yebhavi...@gmail.com wrote:
typecmds.c says:
Domains over composite types might be made to work in the future, but not
today.
Attached is a patch that allows domains over composite types, together with
test cases in domaincomp.sql. A domain over a
On mån, 2011-05-09 at 14:58 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom this collation stuff has seen more post-feature-commit cleanups
than I think any patch I remember. Is there anything we can learn
from this?
Don't do big patches?
Seriously, it looks pretty bad, but this is one of the biggest
On tis, 2011-05-10 at 18:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
The lack of initdb support for getting more-or-less-standard collation
entries into pg_collation on Windows seems to be the major missing
piece from here (dunno if Peter is aware of others). If we don't fix
that before release, we're going to
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
from that? The bigger your patch, the lonelier you are.
I can attest to that.
--
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Seriously, it looks pretty bad, but this is one of the biggest feature
patches in the last 5 years, it touches many places all over the system,
and there is a reason why this topic has been on the TODO list for 10
years: it's overwhelming.
Yeah. I did
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On tis, 2011-05-10 at 18:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
The lack of initdb support for getting more-or-less-standard collation
entries into pg_collation on Windows seems to be the major missing
piece from here (dunno if Peter is aware of others). If we
Darren Duncan dar...@darrenduncan.net writes:
But I'm just citing numeric as an example; there would be a lot more
in practice, potentially one for every individual type, so for example
if operators were defined for the open union rather than for the base
type, then users/extensions could
On Apr 28, 2011, at 2:16 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
So maybe it's half-assed. Maybe the version can be anything but the revision
must be an integer. Maybe there's a `pg_extension_version($extension_name)`
function that returns ARRAY[$version, $revision], and the revision is set in
the
On ons, 2011-05-11 at 16:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Hm, do you know how to enumerate the available locales on Windows?
EnumSystemLocalesEx()
Reference:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd317829(v=vs.85).aspx
Example: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd319091(v=vs.85).aspx
As you
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On ons, 2011-05-11 at 16:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Hm, do you know how to enumerate the available locales on Windows?
EnumSystemLocalesEx()
Reference:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd317829(v=vs.85).aspx
Example:
Hi everyone,
several members of this mailing list mentioned recently it'd be really
useful to have a performance-test farm, that it might improve the
development process and make some changes easier.
I've briefly discussed this with another CSPUG member, who represents a
local company using
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
1) Is there something that might serve as a model?
I've been assuming that we would use the PostgreSQL Buildfarm as a
model.
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/
2) How would you use it? What procedure would you expect?
People who had suitable test
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 5:06 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com wrote:
On Apr 28, 2011, at 2:16 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
So maybe it's half-assed. Maybe the version can be anything but the revision
must be an integer. Maybe there's a `pg_extension_version($extension_name)`
Dne 11.5.2011 23:41, Kevin Grittner napsal(a):
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
1) Is there something that might serve as a model?
I've been assuming that we would use the PostgreSQL Buildfarm as a
model.
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/
Yes, I was thinking about that too, but
1)
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of dom may 08 23:00:27 -0400 2011:
For
example, if you start noticing an occasional integer overflow that
didn't happen before, it might be pretty darn difficult to figure out
that the problem is that an operation that was formerly resolved as int4
+ int4 is
On 05/09/2011 11:25 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
I see you've gone with doing it unconditionally. I'd lean toward testing the
library in pg_xml_init and setting a flag indicating whether we need the extra
pass. However, a later patch can always optimize that.
I wasn't terribly keen on the
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
Dne 11.5.2011 23:41, Kevin Grittner napsal(a):
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
1) Is there something that might serve as a model?
I've been assuming that we would use the PostgreSQL Buildfarm as
a model.
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/
Yes, I
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Or you could just unsetenv instead of complaining.
+1 for that.
OK, the attached patch does this, but allows PGCLIENTENCODING to be
passed in. The new output looks like:
Performing Consistency
Dne 12.5.2011 00:21, Kevin Grittner napsal(a):
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
Dne 11.5.2011 23:41, Kevin Grittner napsal(a):
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
1) Is there something that might serve as a model?
I've been assuming that we would use the PostgreSQL Buildfarm as
a model.
On 05/11/2011 06:21 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Tomas Vondrat...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
Dne 11.5.2011 23:41, Kevin Grittner napsal(a):
Tomas Vondrat...@fuzzy.cz wrote:
First up, you guys should be aware that Greg Smith at least is working
on this. Let's not duplicate effort.
1) Is there
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 06:17:07PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 05/09/2011 11:25 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
SELECT xmlcomment(E'\ufffe');
That's a bit harder. Do we want to extend these checks to cover
surrogates and end of plane characters, which are the remaining
forbidden chars? It
Hello,
Sir, i want to develop a service for postgresql related to querry
processing.but i dont know how to develop it. plz guide me so that i can take
step.
i will be realy thankful to you.
Regards
Emman
On 05/11/2011 07:00 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 06:17:07PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 05/09/2011 11:25 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
SELECT xmlcomment(E'\ufffe');
That's a bit harder. Do we want to extend these checks to cover
surrogates and end of plane characters, which are
* Andrew Dunstan (and...@dunslane.net) wrote:
First up, you guys should be aware that Greg Smith at least is
working on this. Let's not duplicate effort.
Indeed. I'm also interested in making this happen and have worked with
Greg in the past on it. There's even some code out there that we
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
