Hi Alex,
Hmmm, your patch checks for a constraint being only via:
!recurse !recursing
I hope that is good enough to conclusively conclude that the constraint
is
'only'. This check was not too readable in the existing code for me
anyways
;). If we check at the grammar
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 00:28, Nikhil Sontakke nikkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
So with it all spelled out now I see the constraint must be added to
child tables too check is dead code.
Thanks the above step-wise explanation helps.
But AFAICS, the default inhOpt value can be governed by
On tor, 2011-10-06 at 20:15 -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote:
P.S. And on the odd chance that somebody thinks that this
functionality would be possible and helpful to add to libpq, and
the problem is in the lack of human resources: I would be more
then happy to dig into some
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com wrote:
I'd prefer to include it in the initial patch. If the current GiST code
is going to be replaced, then there's not much sense reviewing/testing
it.
You may need to consider unbounded and empty ranges specially. I made an
On 10/05/2011 07:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
davegda...@sonic.net writes:
Postgresql 9.0.4 has the timezone:
America/Blanc-Sablon
However other sources seem to spell this with an underscore instead of dash:
America/Blanc_Sablon
I don't know what other sources you're consulting, but
Hi Hanada-san,
I'm very sorry for late reply.
(2011/09/20 18:49), Shigeru Hanada wrote:
I took a look at the patch, and found that it couldn't be applied
cleanly against HEAD. Please rebase your patch against current HEAD of
master branch, rather than 9.1beta1.
The wiki pages below would
Hi,
I found that by default WAL_DEBUG macro has been defined in
9.2dev and 9.1. I'm very surprised at this. Why does WAL_DEBUG
need to be defined by default? The performance overhead
introduced by WAL_DEBUG is really vanishingly low?
WAL_DEBUG was defined in the following commit:
On 2011-10-06 16:04, Royce Ausburn wrote:
Initial Review for patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-09/msg00744.php
Hello Royce,
Thank you for your review.
I don't think so. The new feature accepts opening a cursor with some
parameter names not specified:
open
On 07.10.2011 12:19, Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi,
I found that by default WAL_DEBUG macro has been defined in
9.2dev and 9.1. I'm very surprised at this. Why does WAL_DEBUG
need to be defined by default? The performance overhead
introduced by WAL_DEBUG is really vanishingly low?
WAL_DEBUG was
Hi,
I'm very sorry for the late reply.
(2011/09/21 10:00), Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from David Fetter's message of mar sep 20 21:22:32 -0300 2011:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Probably a more interesting question is why we wouldn't change
autovacuum so
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Alex Goncharov
alex-goncha...@comcast.net wrote:
,--- I/Alex (Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:02:14 -0400) *
| My understanding is that libpq does not allow one to find if a result
| set column is nullable.
,--- You/Merlin (Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:16:18 -0500) *
| why
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:09:44PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
Hi,
I'm very sorry for the late reply.
(2011/09/21 10:00), Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from David Fetter's message of mar sep 20 21:22:32 -0300 2011:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Probably a
,--- Peter Eisentraut (Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:14:09 +0300) *
| On tor, 2011-10-06 at 20:15 -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote:
| P.S. And on the odd chance that somebody thinks that this
| functionality would be possible and helpful to add to libpq, and
| the problem is in the lack of human
,--- You/Merlin (Fri, 7 Oct 2011 07:39:57 -0500) *
| On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Alex Goncharov
| ,--- Merlin Moncure (Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:28:56 -0500) *
| | hm, good point. not sure how it's useful though. I suppose an
| | application could leverage that for validation purposes,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, I see the problem, and I now agree that it's the DROP CONSTRAINT
code that is buggy.
Want me to roll this fix in as part of the alter table only constraint
patch? Or keep it split out? We might want to backpatch to at
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
I found that by default WAL_DEBUG macro has been defined in
9.2dev and 9.1. I'm very surprised at this. Why does WAL_DEBUG
need to be defined by default? The performance overhead
introduced by WAL_DEBUG is really
On 2011-10-07 12:21, Yeb Havinga wrote:
On 2011-10-06 16:04, Royce Ausburn wrote:
Initial Review for patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-09/msg00744.php
Again, thank you very much for your thorough review. I'll update the
patch so mixing positional and named parameters
Hi,
Here's a patch to allow TOAST tables to be moved to a different
tablespace. This item has been picked up from the TODO list.
Main idea is to consider that a TOAST table can have its own tablespace.
Regards,
--
JT
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 07:53, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The only way we could
trip up in that case is if there were two identically named
constraints. We'd have to visit the first tuple, update it, then
visit the second tuple, recurse (thus incrementing the command
counter),
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 07:53, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The only way we could
trip up in that case is if there were two identically named
constraints. We'd have to visit the first tuple, update it, then
Hi Hackers,
I have a strange problem, or maybe it's not a strange problem but just
something wrong with my understanding i have SIP router which works with
postgresql using libpq, somewhere in the code it inserts a row in the
database and then when the insert is finished it invokes another module
2011年10月4日12:08 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com:
In my opinion, FdwRoutine should have an additional API to inform the core
its
supported features; such as inner-join, outer-join, order-by,
group-by, aggregate
functions, insert, update, delete, etc... in the future version.
Sure,
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
horiguchi.kyot...@oss.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Thank you for reviewing.
The new version of this patch is attached to this message.
OK, I think this is reasonably close to being committable now. There
are a few remaining style and grammar mistakes but
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Usama Dar munir.us...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hackers,
I have a strange problem, or maybe it's not a strange problem but just
something wrong with my understanding i have SIP router which works with
postgresql using libpq, somewhere in the code it inserts a row in
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 09:50, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
My only thought is
perhaps we should add that missing unique index on (conrelid,
conname). If we are not going to support duplicate names in the code,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 20:36, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 08:18, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Amit Khandekar
amit.khande...@enterprisedb.com
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug
builds
IMO, --enable-debug should not do anything but include debugging
symbols. The ability to get a useful stack trace
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug
builds
IMO, --enable-debug should not do
Hello all,
This is a little patch to fix a typo in docs. In the length function
should be a space between string and bytea.
Best regards,
--
Dickson S. Guedes
mail/xmpp: gue...@guedesoft.net - skype: guediz
http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
There is not possible to get a number of processed rows when COPY
is evaluated via SPI. Client can use a tag, but SPI doesn't use a
tag.
I propose a small change a ProcessUtility to return a processed
rows.
Please add this to the open
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I will now work on pg_upgrade to also use the new flag to find the data
directory from a config-only install. However, this is only available
in PG 9.2, and it will only be in PG 9.3 that you can hope to use this
feature (if old is PG 9.2 or
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Please find attached a patch implementing a basic version of
index-only scans.
I'm making some progress with this, but I notice what seems like a
missing feature: there needs to be a way to turn it off. Otherwise
performance comparisons will be
On 10/07/2011 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Please find attached a patch implementing a basic version of
index-only scans.
I'm making some progress with this, but I notice what seems like a
missing feature: there needs to be a way to turn it off.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Please find attached a patch implementing a basic version of
index-only scans.
I'm making some progress with this, but I notice what seems like a
missing feature: there needs to be a
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm making some progress with this, but I notice what seems like a
missing feature: there needs to be a way to turn it off. Otherwise
performance comparisons will be difficult to
Andrea Suisani wrote:
On 10/05/2011 07:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
davegda...@sonic.net writes:
Postgresql 9.0.4 has the timezone:
America/Blanc-Sablon
However other sources seem to spell this with an underscore instead of
dash:
America/Blanc_Sablon
I don't know what other
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
about how convenient it is that we defined WAL_DEBUG in debug
builds
IMO,
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Andrea Suisani wrote:
Speaking of Olson tz database, I've just stumbled across this post
and I thought it would be worthy to report it here:
http://blog.joda.org/2011/10/today-time-zone-database-was-closed.html
I suppose there is nothing stopping them
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Andrea Suisani wrote:
Speaking of Olson tz database, I've just stumbled across this post
and I thought it would be worthy to report it here:
http://blog.joda.org/2011/10/today-time-zone-database-was-closed.html
I suppose there is
On 7 October 2011 21:27, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
It seems pretty baseless to me: you can't copyright a collection of
facts. I think we should do nothing pending a court decision.
Agreed. I am just pointing out the possible exposure.
The one interesting case
On 7 October 2011 21:17, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Andrea Suisani wrote:
Speaking of Olson tz database, I've just stumbled across this post
and I thought it would be worthy to report it here:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 7 October 2011 21:27, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
It seems pretty baseless to me: you can't copyright a collection of
facts. I think we should do nothing pending a court decision.
My original read of the problem determined (for me personally) that the
only way one could be in violation of copyright was if the data was
incorrect (i.e. not factual). It presented an interesting contradiction.
The only way they could sue is by agreeing that their data is faulty and
should
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Mark Mielke m...@mark.mielke.cc wrote:
My original read of the problem determined (for me personally) that the only
way one could be in violation of copyright was if the data was incorrect
(i.e. not factual). It presented an interesting contradiction. The only
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 07:16:33PM +0200, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
My preference is still also WITH(security_barrier=...) syntax.
The arguable point was the behavior when a view is replaced without
explicit WITH clause;
whether we should consider it was specified a default value, or we
should
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Please find attached a patch implementing a basic version of
index-only scans. This patch is the work of my colleague Ibrar Ahmed
and myself, and also incorporates some code from previous patches
posted by Heikki Linnakanagas.
I've committed this
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of these months
about how
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
1. The way that nodeIndexscan.c builds up the faux heap tuple is
perhaps susceptible to improvement. I thought about building a
virtual tuple, but then what do I do with an OID column, if I have
one? Or maybe this should be
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The funny thing is that I've been thinking all of
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 October 2011 21:27, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
It seems pretty baseless to me: you can't copyright a collection of
facts. I think we should do nothing pending a court decision.
The one
Hi Alex,
I guess we both are in agreement with each other :)
After sleeping over it, I think that check is indeed dead code with this new
non-inheritable check constraints functionality in place. So unless you have
some other comments, we can mark this as 'Ready for Commiter'.
Again, thanks for
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Dickson S. Guedes lis...@guedesoft.net wrote:
This is a little patch to fix a typo in docs. In the length function
should be a space between string and bytea.
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
All that said I think this is far murkier than you all seem to think.
Copyright law is one of the most complex areas of the law and this is
one of the least well defined parts of copyright law.
imposing no natural restrictions
54 matches
Mail list logo
