From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 9:43 PM
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
Suggestions?
I suggest you add this to the next CommitFest. :-)
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=14
I have received positive feedback on the pg_dump --split option I suggested,
but it depends on pg_dump dumping objects in a deterministic order.
I'm committed to fixing this. The first problem I've spotted is overloaded
functions.
This patch adds a new element to DumpableObject: char *proargs
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:21 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@justatheory.com wrote:
On Jul 4, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Not really. We have nowhere else to recommend, since we don't run a
replacement for it. And we really don't want to get involved in
listing all the different third
Excerpts from Boszormenyi Zoltan's message of mié jul 04 06:32:46 -0400 2012:
2012-07-04 12:09 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
You just broke initdb with this cleanup. :-)
Ouch.
initdb starts postgres --single, that doesn't do BackendInitialize(),
only PostgresMain(). So, you need
Excerpts from Boszormenyi Zoltan's message of mié jul 04 07:03:44 -0400 2012:
2012-07-03 23:38 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
I don't understand why PGSemaphoreTimedLock() is not broken. I mean
surely you need a bool return to let the caller know whether the
acquisition succeeded
Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of mié jul 04 05:33:48 -0400 2012:
Hello
2012/7/3 Matthew Woodcraft matt...@woodcraft.me.uk:
Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
So I took a look at the patch eelog-2012-05-09.diff today. All of the
following remarks apply to it alone.
I renamed the new element to DumpableObject from proargs to the more
general name sortkey.
This way this element can be used by any object types in the future,
which might require sorting by additional information than type, namespace
and name.
Currently, it's only set for functions/aggregates
Hi,
waitpid() is used with #ifdef HAVE_WAITPID in reaper(), but NOT in
BaseBackup().
Why not? We can ensure that all platforms which PostgreSQL supports
have waitpid()?
If so, can we get rid of #ifdef HAVE_WAITPID in reaper()?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
2012-07-04 17:25 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
Excerpts from Boszormenyi Zoltan's message of mié jul 04 07:03:44 -0400 2012:
2012-07-03 23:38 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
I don't understand why PGSemaphoreTimedLock() is not broken. I mean
surely you need a bool return to let the
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
I think if you don't have a true constraint name to use here, you
shouldn't use anything.
Yeah, I agree. Don't invent a value, just omit the field.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
waitpid() is used with #ifdef HAVE_WAITPID in reaper(), but NOT in
BaseBackup().
Why not? We can ensure that all platforms which PostgreSQL supports
have waitpid()?
If so, can we get rid of #ifdef HAVE_WAITPID in reaper()?
The Single Unix Spec V2
2012/7/4 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
I think if you don't have a true constraint name to use here, you
shouldn't use anything.
Yeah, I agree. Don't invent a value, just omit the field.
ok
Pavel
regards, tom lane
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi Shigeru/Robert,
The way fixing oid2name and pgbench seems reasonable, so applying it to
vacuumlo (as Peter mentioned) would be enough for this issue.
Shall I consider following 2 points to update the patch:
1.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
My point is that it seems like a bug that the secContext gets restored
in one case and not the other, depending on which user ID was specified
in SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION.
Sorry, the above description mention about a
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a patch that attempts to begin the work of adjusting the
documentation for this brave new world. I am guessing that there may
be other
2012/7/4 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
My point is that it seems like a bug that the secContext gets restored
in one case and not the other, depending on which user ID was specified
in SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION.
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com wrote:
[ new patch ]
With the improved comments in pg_wchar.h, it seemed clear what needed
to be done here, so I fixed up the MULE conversion and committed this.
I'd appreciate it if someone would check my work, but I think
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
I can confirm that Oracle returns 0 if the third argument to
INSTR is 0.
Can someone provide a suitable doc patch?
Thanks, committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Personally, I'd have no problem with flat-out dropping (not demoting)
both of those two specific messages. I seem to recall that Bruce has
lobbied
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Joel Jacobson j...@trustly.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
I think this idea has merit. Prepare a patch and put it into the next
commit fest.
Glad to hear, I'm on it!
I see the problem that since the dump
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com
wrote:
[ new patch ]
With the improved comments in pg_wchar.h, it seemed clear what needed
to be done here, so I fixed up the MULE conversion and committed this.
I'd appreciate it if someone would check my work, but
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:50:48PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:57:41PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
What about something like this in
On 28 June 2012 19:20, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
0001-Add-embedded-list-interface.patch
Looks good now?
I have a few gripes.
+ * there isn't much we can test in a single linked list except that its
There are numerous references to single linked lists, where, I
believe,
From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 8:59 PM
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
Based on the discussion and suggestions in this mail chain, following
features can be implemented:
1. To compute the value of max LSN
Heya
Just in case someone missed it on -perform and is interested, a couple
of questions have come in from VMWare, who want to use PostgreSQL as the
default reference implementation for a new TPC benchmark, TPC-V.
Le 3 juil. 2012 à 19:53, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net a écrit :
I think it would be better if DO could be extended into some kind of
lambda, taking parameters and returning a value. Then you can use
existing infrastructure for passing values and saving the return. It
would also extend
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 3, 2012, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On 3 July 2012 20:20, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
The second one removes the reference to pgfoundry completely. As a
step in the deprecation.
I'd prefer
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:01 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@justatheory.com wrote:
On Jul 3, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
The smaller one, pgfoundry_1.diff, removes the suggestion to apply for
new projects on pgfoundry. The reason for this being that pgfoundry
doesn't *accept* new
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Bjorn Munch bjorn.mu...@oracle.com wrote:
On 03/07 21.24, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Our documentation still refers to PostgreSQL bundled in solaris, and
references downloads to the pgfoundry project.
Oh! I wasn't aware of that.
Attached patch removes all those
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Attached are two patches, one of which I'd like to apply. Open for
discussion on which one.
The smaller one, pgfoundry_1.diff, removes the suggestion to apply for
new projects on pgfoundry. The reason for this being that pgfoundry
doesn't *accept* new projects
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Attached are two patches, one of which I'd like to apply. Open for
discussion on which one.
The smaller one, pgfoundry_1.diff, removes the suggestion to apply for
new projects on pgfoundry. The
Robert Haas wrote:
I can confirm that Oracle returns 0 if the third argument to
INSTR is 0.
Can someone provide a suitable doc patch?
Here you are.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
instr-doc.patch
Description: instr-doc.patch
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Applied to master, 9.2 and 9.1.
Thank you!
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
Hello
2012/7/3 Matthew Woodcraft matt...@woodcraft.me.uk:
Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
So I took a look at the patch eelog-2012-05-09.diff today. All of the
following remarks apply to it alone.
I've been trying out this patch for my own interest (I'm very pleased to
see
Hi Kaigai-san,
Sorry for delayed reply.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote:
* It seems to me expected results of the regression test is not
attached, even though test cases were included. Please add it.
AFAICS the patch I posted contains both test
2012-07-03 23:31 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
Excerpts from Boszormenyi Zoltan's message of vie jun 29 14:30:28 -0400 2012:
Does anyone have a little time to look at the latest timeout framework
with the registration interface and the 2nd patch too? I am at work
until Friday next week,
2012-07-04 12:09 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
2012-07-03 23:31 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
Excerpts from Boszormenyi Zoltan's message of vie jun 29 14:30:28 -0400 2012:
Does anyone have a little time to look at the latest timeout framework
with the registration interface and
2012-07-03 23:38 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
I don't understand why PGSemaphoreTimedLock() is not broken. I mean
surely you need a bool return to let the caller know whether the
acquisition succeeded or failed?
Well, this is the same interface PGSemaphoreTryLock() uses.
By this
Patch attached. Asif, could you try a few things on a CP1252 database?
First verify if your original test case now works and then try this:
I have test the patch on Win64. postgres server is working fine now for
WIN1252. Thanks.
create function enctest() returns text as $$
return
On 04/07/12 13:58, Asif Naeem wrote:
Patch attached. Asif, could you try a few things on a CP1252 database?
First verify if your original test case now works and then try this:
I have test the patch on Win64. postgres server is working fine now for
WIN1252. Thanks.
create function
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
I think this idea has merit. Prepare a patch and put it into the next
commit fest.
Glad to hear, I'm on it!
I see the problem that since the dump order is in general not
deterministic, this will cause random
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
On Jul 4, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Not really. We have nowhere else to recommend, since we don't run a
replacement for it. And we really don't want to get involved in
listing all the different third party sites out there. (For example,
we had a reference to sourceforge.net in
44 matches
Mail list logo
