2012/11/2 Alexander Korotkov :
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>>
>> 2012/9/23 Kohei KaiGai :
>> > 2012/8/29 Kohei KaiGai :
>> >> 2012/8/28 Kohei KaiGai :
>> >>> 2012/8/28 Tom Lane :
>> Kohei KaiGai writes:
>> >> Would it be too invasive to introduce a new pointer
On 11/04/2012 08:47 AM, Matthew Gerber wrote:
>
> Here is the command that was executing when the 0xC409 exception
> was raised:
>
> INSERT INTO places (bounding_box,country,full_name,id,name,type,url)
>
> VALUES
>
> (st_transform_null(ST_GeometryFromText('POLYGON((-97.034085
> 32.771786,-97.03
(2012/11/03 10:44), Josh Berkus wrote:
I don't see all that going into core without a much bigger push than I
think people will buy. What people really want for all these is a
proper trending system, and that means graphs and dashboards and
bling--not a history table.
Well, I'm particularly
Hello
2012/11/4 Satoshi Nagayasu :
> (2012/11/03 10:44), Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I don't see all that going into core without a much bigger push than I
>>> think people will buy. What people really want for all these is a
>>> proper trending system, and that means graphs and dashboards and
>
Hello
here is patch, that enables using a variadic parameter modifier for
variadic "any" function.
Motivation for this patch is consistent behave of "format" function,
but it fixes behave of all this class variadic functions.
postgres=> -- check pass variadic argument
postgres=> select format('%
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 11/04/2012 08:47 AM, Matthew Gerber wrote:
>
>
> Here is the command that was executing when the 0xC409 exception was
> raised:
>
> INSERT INTO places (bounding_box,country,full_name,id,name,type,url)
>
> VALUES
>
> (st_transform_null
Matthew Gerber writes:
>> Here is the command that was executing when the 0xC409 exception was
>> raised:
>> INSERT INTO places (bounding_box,country,full_name,id,name,type,url)
>> VALUES
>> (st_transform_null(ST_GeometryFromText('POLYGON((-97.034085
>> 32.771786,-97.034085 32.953966,-96.88878
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 12:47 +0400, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Right version of patch is attached.
>
* In bounds_adjacent, there's no reason to flip the labels back.
* Comment should indicate more explicitly that bounds_adjacent is
sensitive to the argument order.
* In bounds_adjacent, it appears
Is there any fundamental or philosophical reason why a foreign table
can't accept arguments? Should that be a TODO?
Right now, to accept arguments to a from-clause item, you have to use an
SRF, which is much more limited than a foreign table. If foreign tables
could accept arguments, then SRFs cou
Jeff Davis writes:
> Is there any fundamental or philosophical reason why a foreign table
> can't accept arguments?
That isn't a table; it's some sort of function. Now that we have
LATERAL, there is no good reason to contort SQL's syntax and semantics
in the direction you suggest.
Dimitri Fontaine writes:
> The current design for event triggers is to spit out several things:
>
> - command tag is already commited
> - object id, can be null
> - schema name, can be null
> - object name
> - operationeither ALTER, CREATE or DROP,
I don't understand the question. A table accepting arguments? What do you mean
with that? Can you give an code example in an other RDBMS (like oracle)?
Perhaps nothing came up because there are more people not understanding what
you want to accomplish?
regards,
Willem
> Subject: [HACKERS] Ar
On 11/04/12 11:59 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:
Is there any fundamental or philosophical reason why a foreign table
can't accept arguments? Should that be a TODO?
what does that even mean?how would 'data' accept 'arguments' ??!
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz
>
> what does that even mean?how would 'data' accept 'arguments' ??!
>
>
That's Sherlock Holmes! "Don't argue with your data"
Pavan Deolasee writes:
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Nikhil Sontakke wrote:
So coming back to the issue, do you think it's a good idea to teach
ATAddCheckConstraint() that the call is coming from a late phase of ALTER
TABLE ?
>>> +1
>> You mentioned AT_PASS_OLD_INDEX in your
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Daniel Farina:
>> The idea of canceling a COMMIT statement causing a COMMIT seems pretty
>> strange to me.
>
> Canceling commits is inherently racy, so I'm not sure if this behavior
> so strange after all.
Yeah. You can't make the local f
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Did the inserted row also arrive at the standby?
>
No, as there was no standby.
--
Peter van Hardenberg
San Francisco, California
"Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt." -- Kurt Vonnegut
Dear hackers Sorry for not replying the patch review. I didn't see the
review until recently as my mail box is full of Postgres mails and I didn't
notice the one for me, my mail box configuration problem. I am still kind
of busy with my university final year project. I shall not have tim
ISTM it would be better to update the text about index cost estimation in
indexam.sgml. Please find attached a patch.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
indexam.sgml.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
19 matches
Mail list logo