(2013/07/04 3:58), Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Since pg_relpages(oid) doesn't exist, pg_relpages() is in the same
situation as pgstatindex(), i.e., we
Hi Rushabh,
(2013/07/16 14:58), Rushabh Lathia wrote:
Hello Satoshi,
I assigned myself for the reviewer of this patch. Issue status is waiting on
author.
Thank you for picking it up.
Now looking at the discussion under the thread it seems like we are waiting
for the suggestion for the new
I'm getting errors while executing make dist on git master head.
$ make dist
make dist
rm -rf postgresql-9.4devel* =install=
for x in `cd . find . \( -name CVS -prune \) -o \( -name .git -prune \) -o
-print`; do \
file=`expr X$x : 'X\./\(.*\)'`; \
if test -d ./$file ; then \
(2013/07/09 19:55), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Hello, I've brought visibilitymap extentions for pg_freespacemap
and pgstattuple.
At Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:59:05 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote in
To clarify what state this is all in: Fabien's latest
pgbench-throttle-v15.patch is the ready for a committer version. The
last two revisions are just tweaking the comments at this point, and
his version is more correct than my last one.
Got it. I will take care of this.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA
Hi Satoshi,
I spent some time on the revised version on the
patch(pgstattuple_regclass_v2.diff)
and here are my comments.
.) Patch get applies cleanly on PG master branch
.) Successful build and database creation
.) Basic test coverage included in the patch
.) make check running cleanly
Hi
I want to know how an index is created and used.
actually if you can show to me a simple start point, it would be great.
Regards,
Soroosh Sardari
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-07-07 15:43:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
3b) Add catcache 'filter' that ensures the cache stays unique and use
that for the mapping
I slightly prefer 3b)
Consider this sequence of commands:
create type rowtype as (c int, d int);
create temp table t of rowtype;
\c -
drop type rowtype cascade;
Since the switch to MVCC catalog scans, it exhibits the following error about
10% of the time on my system:
CREATE TYPE
CREATE TABLE
You are
On 07/16/2013 02:53 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
I'm getting errors while executing make dist on git master head.
$ make dist
make dist
rm -rf postgresql-9.4devel* =install=
for x in `cd . find . \( -name CVS -prune \) -o \( -name .git -prune \) -o
-print`; do \
file=`expr X$x :
It's working for me:
...
/bin/tar chf postgresql-9.4devel.tar postgresql-9.4devel
gzip --best -c postgresql-9.4devel.tar postgresql-9.4devel.tar.gz
bzip2 -c postgresql-9.4devel.tar postgresql-9.4devel.tar.bz2
rm -rf postgresql-9.4devel
It looks like your source directory
On 07/16/2013 09:53 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 07/16/2013 02:53 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
I'm getting errors while executing make dist on git master head.
$ make dist
make dist
rm -rf postgresql-9.4devel* =install=
for x in `cd . find . \( -name CVS -prune \) -o \( -name .git
-prune \) -o
soroosh sardari wrote
Hi
I want to know how an index is created and used.
actually if you can show to me a simple start point, it would be great.
Regards,
Soroosh Sardari
In the documentation there is a table of contents and listed on that table
is a section named Indexes.
David J.
David Johnston wrote
soroosh sardari wrote
Hi
I want to know how an index is created and used.
actually if you can show to me a simple start point, it would be great.
Regards,
Soroosh Sardari
In the documentation there is a table of contents and listed on that table
is a section
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
Consider this sequence of commands:
create type rowtype as (c int, d int);
create temp table t of rowtype;
\c -
drop type rowtype cascade;
Since the switch to MVCC catalog scans, it exhibits the following
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
Let's fix this by having systable_recheck_tuple() acquire a fresh catalog
MVCC
snapshot and recheck against that. I believe it would also be fully safe to
use SnapshotNow here;
On 7/16/13 10:03 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Incidentally, the buildfarm animal guaibasaurus builds make dist every
build, via a bespoke buildfarm module. See for example
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=guaibasaurusdt=2013-07-16%2004%3A17%3A01stg=make-dist,
so we should
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Like uses the operator class text_pattern_ops which doesn't include an
implict cast.
This is wrong. Casts are associated with data types, not operator classes.
For one thing, the implicit cast is from text --
integer, not
On 2013-07-16 09:50:07 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
With \c, in general, you may end up executing commands under the new session
before the old backend has finished exiting. For this test case specifically,
the two backends' attempts to drop table t regularly overlap. The old
backend would drop
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 04:32:52PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Now, should we support the 0.9.6-and-earlier mechanism? My inclination
is no; even RHEL 3, the oldest supported Linux distribution, uses 0.9.7
(Heck, even Red
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I continue to be of the opinion that our behavior in this area is
bone-headed. It's reasonable to reject integer = character varying on
the basis that we don't know whether integer or character varying
comparison semantics are wanted, and the two
2013/7/15 Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net:
On 07/14/2013 12:28 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
2013/7/14 Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net:
On 06/29/2013 03:29 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
5. This patch has user visibility, i.e. now we are throwing an error
when
user only says
On Jul 14, 2013 9:46 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I updated and re-reviewed that in 2011:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4d31ae64.3000...@2ndquadrant.com and
commented on why I think the improvement was difficult to reproduce back
then. The improvement didn't follow for
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
But '1' LIKE 1 is not ambiguous
What about '1' LIKE 01 ?
What do people who write this actually expect LIKE to do? I gather
they're actually treating it as a synonym for =?
--
greg
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Andres Freund escribió:
Just as a datapoint, if you benchmark the numbers of forks that can be
performed by a single process (i.e. postmaster) the number is easily in
the 10s of thousands. Now forking that much has
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:56:10PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-07-16 09:50:07 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
With \c, in general, you may end up executing commands under the new
session
before the old backend has finished exiting. For this test case
specifically,
the two backends'
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 08:51:52PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 04:32:52PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Now, should we support the 0.9.6-and-earlier mechanism? My
inclination is no; even RHEL 3, the oldest supported Linux
distribution, uses 0.9.7 (Heck, even Red Hat
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I don't agree with this opinion.
I know.
'1' + '2' might be claimed to have
only one plausible meaning as well, but that doesn't mean that we should
accept it.
That example clearly has multiple sensible interpretations,
On 7/16/13 12:46 PM, Ants Aasma wrote:
Spread checkpoints sprinkles the writes out over a long
period and the general tuning advice is to heavily bound the amount of
memory the OS willing to keep dirty.
That's arguing that you can make this feature be useful if you tune in a
particular way.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:00 PM, David Johnston pol...@yahoo.com wrote:
David Johnston wrote
soroosh sardari wrote
Hi
I want to know how an index is created and used.
actually if you can show to me a simple start point, it would be great.
Regards,
Soroosh Sardari
In the
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
PostgreSQL requires more casts that any other mainstream database
system on the planet, and it's one of the biggest barriers to
migrating from other database systems to PostgreSQL. I understand
that there is a
On 07/16/2013 01:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Andres points out that you can install adminpack to obtain
local filesystem access, and that is true. But the system
administrator can also refuse to allow adminpack, and/or use selinux
or other mechanisms to prevent the postgres binary from writing
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
PostgreSQL requires more casts that any other mainstream database
system on the planet, and it's one of the biggest barriers to
migrating from
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch wrote:
But okay, you're saying we *have* and *want* a guarantee that even a
superuser cannot execute arbitrary native code via libpq (at least in
default installs w/o extensions).
Yes, that's a good way of summarizing my
Hello
2013/7/15 Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
I think it's a waste of code to try to handle bushy trees. A list is
not a particularly efficient
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
We can certainly continue to play whack-a-mole and dream up a new
solution every time a really intolerable variant of this problem comes
up. But that doesn't seem good to me. It means that every case
behaves a little different from every other case,
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 09:26:38PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I'm pretty sure we've got latent memory-ordering risks in our existing
code which we just haven't detected and fixed yet. Consider, for
example, this exciting code from GetNewTransactionId:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:11:40PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Does support for alternative multi-byte encodings have something to do
with the Han unification controversy? I don't know terribly much about
this, so apologies if that's just wrong.
There's a famous problem regarding
On 07/08/2013 04:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Well, Tom opined in
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/23249.1370878...@sss.pgh.pa.us that
the current patch is okay. I have a mild opinion that it should instead
print only SHR_LOCK when both bits are
On 07/11/2013 09:28 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
Neither of these address Tom's concerns about API changes and future
flexibility. I was assigned this patch in the rreviewers list and my
inclination would be to take it but I wasn't about to
overrule Tom. If he says he's ok with it then I'm fine going
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
On 07/08/2013 04:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, I think that's exactly what I did in the preliminary 9.3 patch
that I committed to pg_filedump a few weeks ago. Could you take a look
at what's there now and see if that's what you meant?
So, is this getting
On 07/09/2013 01:10 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
Where are we with this patch? Fabien, are you going to submit an
updated version which addresses the objections, or should I mark it
Returned With Feedback?
There is no need for an updated patch. I addressed the objections with
words, not
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
On 07/09/2013 01:10 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
Where are we with this patch? Fabien, are you going to submit an
updated version which addresses the objections, or should I mark it
Returned With Feedback?
There is no need for an updated patch. I addressed
Hackers,
As the Commitfest is past deadline, here is the disposition of 15
patches which were still marked Needs Review:
Needs Review
The following patches have not had even one substantial review. Please
someone pick them up and review them ASAP:
- Row-Level Security - KaiGai
On 07/16/2013 03:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
On 07/09/2013 01:10 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
Where are we with this patch? Fabien, are you going to submit an
updated version which addresses the objections, or should I mark it
Returned With Feedback?
There is
Hackers,
The following patches were Waiting on Author as of today. As such,
most have been marked returned with feedback. Authors are encouraged
to update their patches and submit to the next Commitfest.
There are a few exceptions to Returned with feedback, though:
Could Not Determine Status:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
Ok, I've committed this patch now. Finally, phew!
I found that this patch causes the assertion failure. When I set up simple
replication
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:41:44AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 08:51:52PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
Agreed. The OpenSSL Project last applied a security fix to 0.9.6
over eight years ago. Compatibility with 0.9.6 has zero or negative
value.
You've made a persuasive
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:27:02AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I recommend reworking the header comment to avoid mention of
SnapshotNow, since if we get rid of SnapshotNow, the reference might
not be too clear to far-future hackers.
+ /*
+ * For a scan using a non-MVCC snapshot like
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:43:04AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15:12PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
See attached patch revisions. The first patch edits
find_minmax_aggs_walker()
per my comments just now. The second is an update of your FILTER patch with
the
Hi all,
It happens that I work occasionally on multiple builds based on
different stable branches at the same time to check fixes that need to
be backpatched, and I tend to easily lose track on which version the
build I created is based on (Duh!). There is of course the version
number up to the
On 07/15/2013 04:10 PM, Greg Jaskiewicz wrote:
In terms of features, apart from separating LISTEN so that it can be actually
used on Standbys, wouldn't it be a matter of including the notifications in the
WAL stream, as simple packets ?
This would guarantee same behaviour as on the master.
I
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
It happens that I work occasionally on multiple builds based on
different stable branches at the same time to check fixes that need to
be backpatched, and I tend to easily lose track on which version the
build I created is based on (Duh!).
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 7/16/13 12:46 PM, Ants Aasma wrote:
Spread checkpoints sprinkles the writes out over a long
period and the general tuning advice is to heavily bound the amount of
memory the OS willing to keep dirty.
That's arguing
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:00 PM, David Johnston pol...@yahoo.com wrote:
David Johnston wrote
soroosh sardari wrote
Hi
I want to know how an index is created and used.
actually if you can show to me a simple start point, it would be great.
Regards,
Soroosh Sardari
In the
On 07/16/2013 11:09 PM, soroosh sardari wrote:
Actually I mean the index in the source code, I want to know how index
is used in the backend for
execution of some query.
sorry my question is a bit ambiguous,
I start to read src/backend/access/index/genam.c, and I think maybe
this file is
56 matches
Mail list logo
