Resolved.
Regression test outputs for name and enum can be replaced with generated out.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:17 AM, imagene...@gmail.com
imagene...@gmail.com wrote:
This is resolved by running dpkg-buildpackage with postgres and
dpkg-buildpackage -rsudo with the postgresql source folder
On 12/17/13, 4:53 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I'm specifically thinking of master partition tables. In that
case, we really want an INSTEAD OF trigger.
/me scratches head.
So, put a BEFORE trigger, and make it return NULL. Same effect,
different notation.
But it's not the same effect at
On 2013-12-16 23:01:16 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 2013-12-14 11:50:00 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, it still seems to me that the right way to think about this is
that the change stream begins at a certain
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Hannu Krosing ha...@2ndquadrant.comwrote:
On 12/16/2013 08:39 AM, David Rowley wrote:
Any other ideas or +1's for any of the existing ones?
+1, inverse good :)
In the attached patch I've renamed negative to inverse. I've also disabled
the inverse
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Right. I think a lot of the tension comes from people being unconvinced
that the existing extension feature is an ideal model for this sort of
use-case. Extensions were mainly designed around the notion of a .so
The effort here is all about extending the
Hi,
I fixed the patch to improve followings.
- Can compile in MacOS.
- Change GUC name enable_kernel_readahead to readahead_strategy.
- Change POSIX_FADV_SEQUNENTIAL to POISX_FADV_NORMAL when we select sequential
access strategy, this reason is later...
I tested simple two access
From: Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
Few minor things:
1.
evtHandle = RegisterEventSource(NULL,
*event_source? event_source: DEFAULT_EVENT_SOURCE);
In this code, you are trying to access the value (*event_source) and
incase it is not initialised,
it will not contain the value and could
Hello,
I've found a small bug of ECPG and attached a patch. I tested the fix with
9.4. I'd like the fix to be back-ported.
[Problem]
The ECPG app runs the statement:
EXEC SQL CONNECT TO 'tcp:postgresql://?service=my_service';
I want this app to connect to any database based on the
On 17 December 2013 11:50, KONDO Mitsumasa
kondo.mitsum...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Unpatched PG is faster than patched in A and B query. It was about 1.3 times
faster. Result of A query as expected, because patched PG cannot execute
readahead at all. So cache cold situation is bad for patched PG.
On 2013-12-16 00:53:10 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Yes, I think we could mostly reuse it, we'd probably want to add a field
or two more (application_name, sync_prio?). I have been wondering
whether some of the code in replication/logical/logical.c shouldn't be
in replication/slot.c or
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-12-16 00:53:10 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Yes, I think we could mostly reuse it, we'd probably want to add a field
or two more (application_name, sync_prio?). I have been wondering
whether some of the code
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to wrote:
On 12/17/13, 4:53 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I'm specifically thinking of master partition tables. In that
case, we really want an INSTEAD OF trigger.
/me scratches head.
So, put a BEFORE trigger, and make it return
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer Management and
other performance related work. It is quite useful utility.
+1 for reviving this patch for 9.4
Any other votes?
--
Robert Haas
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-12-14 17:43:36 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-12-14 11:27:53 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
In HEAD:
regression=# \d pg_depend
Table pg_catalog.pg_depend
Column| Type | Modifiers
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-12-16 23:01:16 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 2013-12-14 11:50:00 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, it still seems to me that the
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:10 PM, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
For reference, see:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS
for the currently suggested suite for TLS servers.
...
But for pgsql, I'd leave off the !PSK; pre-shared keys may prove useful
for some. And RC4,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
static Datum regclass_gut(char *class_name_or_oid, bool raiseError);
static List *stringToQualifiedNameList_gut(const char *string, bool
raiseError);
Please spell that as guts not gut.
Thanks. I see.
regclass_gut
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Hard to say, the issues fixed in the release are quite important as
well. I'd tend to say they are more important. I think we just need to
release 9.3.3 pretty soon.
Yeah.
* Dimitri Fontaine (dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr) wrote:
OTOH, for a set of pure-SQL objects, it's not necessary that there be a
canonical text file somewhere, and we have in principle complete knowledge
of the objects' semantics as well as the ability to dump-and-restore into
newer PG versions.
Hello
updated patch
time zone type functions are overloaded now
postgres=# select '1973-07-15 08:15:55.33+02'::timestamptz;
timestamptz
---
1973-07-15 07:15:55.33+01
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT make_timestamptz(1973, 07, 15, 08, 15, 55.33, 2);
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Committers should now try to get the Ready for Committer queue cleared.
I'm still hacking on the WITHIN GROUP patch, and will look at the planner
indexes thing after that's done.
That leaves 8 patches that haven't been reviewed. If you take a look,
On 12/15/13, 12:59 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Why wouldn't we have a version that optionally accepts the timezone? That
mirrors what you can currently do with a cast from text, and having to set the
GUC if you need a different TZ would be a real PITA.
It is not bad idea.
What will be
On 12/17/13, 8:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer Management and
other performance related work. It is quite useful utility.
+1 for reviving this patch for 9.4
Any
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-12-16 17:43:37 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
This POC patch changes the two places in HeapTupleSatisfiesUpdate that
need to be touched for this to work. This is probably too simplistic,
in that I make the involved cases return
2013/12/17 Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net
On 12/15/13, 12:59 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Why wouldn't we have a version that optionally accepts the timezone?
That mirrors what you can currently do with a cast from text, and having to
set the GUC if you need a different TZ would be a real PITA.
Pavel Stehule escribió:
but AT TIME ZONE allows double (but decimal parts is ignored quietly)
postgres=# select make_time(10,20,30) at time zone '+10.2';
timezone
-
23:20:30-10
so I propose (and I implemented) a variant with int as time zone
and we can (if we would)
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer
Management and other performance related work. It is quite
useful utility.
+1 for reviving this patch for 9.4
Any other votes?
Where I would have
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 09:51:30AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:10 PM, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
For reference, see:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS
for the currently suggested suite for TLS servers.
...
But for pgsql, I'd leave
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net wrote:
On 12/17/13, 8:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer Management
and
other performance related
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Yeah, I think a constructor should allow a text timezone.
Yes. I think a numeric timezone parameter is about 99% useless,
and if you do happen to need that behavior you can just cast the
numeric to text no?
regards, tom
2013/12/17 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Yeah, I think a constructor should allow a text timezone.
Yes. I think a numeric timezone parameter is about 99% useless,
and if you do happen to need that behavior you can just cast the
numeric to text
On 12/17/2013 12:06 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.comwrote:
I took a stab at using posix_fadvise() in ANALYZE. It turned out to be
very easy, patch attached. Your mileage may vary, but I'm seeing a nice
gain from this on my
2013/12/17 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
Pavel Stehule escribió:
but AT TIME ZONE allows double (but decimal parts is ignored quietly)
postgres=# select make_time(10,20,30) at time zone '+10.2';
timezone
-
23:20:30-10
so I propose (and I implemented) a
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Gregory Smith gregsmithpg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/16/13 9:36 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
- Finish and commit updatable security barrier views. I've still got a
lot of straightening out to do there.
I don't follow why you've put this part first. It has a lot of
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
attached you will find a patch for showing the current transaction id
(xid) and the xmin of a backend in pg_stat_activty and the xmin in
pg_stat_replication.
This may be helpful when looking for the cause
Hello
2013/12/17 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
2013/12/17 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Yeah, I think a constructor should allow a text timezone.
Yes. I think a numeric timezone parameter is about 99% useless,
and if you do
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
My thinking is that if we invent a new mechanism for extensions that are
not managed like contribs, we will find out that only contribs are going
to be using extensions.
That's only accurate if the new mechanism supports .so's, which seems
unlikely to
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The hard part is not extracting the partial qual. The hard part is
trying to make sure that adding this entirely-redundant scan qual doesn't
catastrophically degrade join size
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 06:07:38PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
2013/12/17 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
2013/12/17 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Yeah, I think a constructor should allow a text
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net wrote:
On 12/17/13, 8:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer Management
and
other performance related
* Dimitri Fontaine (dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr) wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
My thinking is that if we invent a new mechanism for extensions that are
not managed like contribs, we will find out that only contribs are going
to be using extensions.
That's only accurate if
On 12/16/2013 07:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
So, put a BEFORE trigger, and make it return NULL. Same effect,
different notation.
NOT the same:
Master partition table with BEFORE trigger:
josh=# insert into a ( id, val ) values ( 23, 'test' ), ( 24, 'test'),
(25,'test');
INSERT 0 0
^^^
There are also timezones off by 15 minutes (although only a few, mainly
Nepal).
The only integer representation I've ever seen is in 15 minutes units.
http://www.timeanddate.com/time/time-zones-interesting.html
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue,
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 06:53:02PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
This is a small patch a bit improving a comment in
src/backend/commands/copy.c.
Thanks, applied.
--
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+
Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr writes:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
That's only accurate if the new mechanism supports .so's, which seems
unlikely to be the case.
Really?
Yes, really.
So now, you don't need anymore to have file system write privileges into
a central
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I had been thinking it would fall down if there are several OR conditions
affecting different collections of rels, but after going through the math
again, I'm now thinking I was wrong and it does in fact work out. As you
On 12/16/2013 11:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Right. I think a lot of the
tension comes from people being unconvinced
that the existing extension feature is an ideal model for this sort of
use-case. Extensions were mainly designed around the notion of a .so
with some SQL datatype/function/etc
On 13 December 2013 18:42, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Jeff Davis (pg...@j-davis.com) wrote:
For what it's worth, I think the idea of extension templates has good
conceptual integrity. Extensions are external blobs. To make them work
more smoothly in several ways, we move them
On 16 December 2013 14:36, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
- Decide on and implement a structure for row-security functionality its
self. I'm persuaded by Robert's comments here, that whatever we expose
must be significantly more usable than a DIY on top of views (with the
fix for
* Simon Riggs (si...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
I keep seeing people repeat I don't like blobs as if that were an
objection. There is no danger or damage from doing this. I can't see
any higher beauty that we're striving for by holding out. Why not
allow the user to choose XML, JSON, YAML, or
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Andres Freund escribió:
What's your plan to commit this? I'd prefer to wait till Alvaro's
freezing changes get in, so his patch will look the same in HEAD and
9.3. But I think he plans to commit soon.
Yes, I do.
On 12/17/2013 08:32 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Simon Riggs (si...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
My only personal interest in this is to stimulate the writing of
further extensions, which is fairly clearly hampered by the overhead
required for packaging.
I'm not convinced of that but I agree that we
I had to write obscure code for processing time zone and using it for
timestamptz
Datum
make_timestamptz_at_timezone(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Timestamp timestamp;
text *zone;
int tz;
chartzname[TZ_STRLEN_MAX + 1];
char
On 17 December 2013 17:03, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Gregory Smith gregsmithpg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/16/13 9:36 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
- Finish and commit updatable security barrier views. I've still got a
lot of straightening out to do
On 12/17/2013 08:26 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 09:51:30AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:10 PM, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
For reference, see:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS
for the currently suggested suite for TLS
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:31 PM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
Any other votes?
+1
Some customers requested:
1. fill the database cache with frequently accessed data before starting or
resuming service for their users (for the first time or after maintenance
work), so that they can
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:26:13AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 09:51:30AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
I'm starting to think we should just leave this well enough alone. We
can't seem to find two people with the same idea of what would be
better than what we have now.
On 18/12/13 05:26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 09:51:30AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:10 PM, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
For reference, see:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS
for the currently suggested suite for TLS
From: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer Management
and
other performance related work. It is quite useful utility.
+1 for reviving this patch for 9.4
Any
On 12/17/2013 06:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
I have used pg_prewarm during some of work related to Buffer Management and
other performance related work. It is quite useful utility.
+1 for reviving this patch for 9.4
Hi,
Attached patch adds GiST support to the inet datatypes with two new
operators. Overlaps operator can be used with exclusion constraints.
Is adjacent to operator is just the negator of it. Index uses only
the network bits of the addresses. Except for the new operators and
is contained within,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 05:10:38PM -0500, James Cloos wrote:
MK == Marko Kreen mark...@gmail.com writes:
PE == Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
PE Any other opinions on this out there?
For reference, see:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS
for the currently
On 17 December 2013 17:28, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
So at this point I'm pretty much talked into it. We could eliminate the
dependence on indexes entirely, and replace this code with a step that
simply tries to pull single-base-relation quals out of ORs wherever it can
find one.
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
(I wonder if it'd be worth inserting a check that
there's not already a manually-generated equivalent clause, too ...)
Sounds a little too clever IMHO.
The argument for doing it is
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
What surprises me is we don't have an API that allows an FDW to decide
what it can accept or not. It seems strange to have a unilateral
decision by our planner about what another planner is capable of.
Uh, what?
There's certainly missing features in
On 11/15/2013 05:41 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
A fundamental problem with this is that it needs to handle isolation
reliable, so that the assertion cannot be violated when two concurrent
backends do things. Consider the example from the manual, which checks
that a table has at least one
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Well, it would help if those cases weren't dead code. Neither
heap_update nor heap_delete are ever called in the no wait case at
all. Only heap_lock_tuple is, and I can't see any misbehavior there
either, even with HeapTupleBeingUpdated returned when there's a
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:41:17PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
[Cause]
While the session is being established, the server cannot use the
client encoding for message conversion yet, because it cannot access
system catalogs to retrieve conversion functions. So, the server
sends messages to the client
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 11/15/2013 05:41 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
A fundamental problem with this is that it needs to handle isolation
reliable, so that the assertion cannot be violated when two concurrent
backends do things. Consider the example from the manual, which
On 12/17/2013 04:42 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 11/15/2013 05:41 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
A fundamental problem with this is that it needs to handle isolation
reliable, so that the assertion cannot be violated when two concurrent
backends do things.
On 18/12/13 10:48, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 12/17/2013 04:42 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 11/15/2013 05:41 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
A fundamental problem with this is that it needs to handle isolation
reliable, so that the assertion cannot be
On 17 December 2013 17:54, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
So now, you don't need anymore to have file system write privileges into
a central place owned by root, it can be anywhere else,
Modern OSes have security checks that can prevent loading libraries from
random places. This is
On 17 December 2013 18:32, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Simon Riggs (si...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
I keep seeing people repeat I don't like blobs as if that were an
objection. There is no danger or damage from doing this. I can't see
any higher beauty that we're striving for by
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 17 December 2013 18:32, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
I have no idea where you're going with this, but I *do* object to
sticking an SQL script which defines a bunch of objects into a catalog
table *right next to where they are properly
On 12/17/13, 10:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Perhaps we should just move all the Needs Review and RFC patches forward
to the next fest, so we don't forget about them?
This was done the last few times, but it has caused some controversy.
One problem was that a number of patches arrived in this commit
On 17 December 2013 23:42, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
We aim to have the simplest implementation that meets the stated need
and reasonable extrapolations of that. Text in a catalog table is the
simplest implementation. That is not a reason to reject it, especially
when we aren't
On 12/17/2013 01:42 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Going back over this patch, I haven't seen any further discussion of the
point Heikki raises above, which seems like a bit of a showstopper.
Heikki, did you have specific ideas on how to solve this? Right now
VACUUM FREEZE sets both vacuum_freeze_min_age and vacuum_freeze_table_age
to 0, but only the former is documented. This patch notes that the other
setting is also affected.
(now with patch--sorry about that)
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/vacuum.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/vacuum.sgml
index eb71581..5f03343 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/vacuum.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/vacuum.sgml
@@ -100,8 +100,9 @@ VACUUM [ FULL ] [ FREEZE ] [ VERBOSE ] ANALYZE [ replaceable
(2013/12/18 5:33), Robert Haas wrote:
Sounds like it might be worth dusting the patch off again...
I'd like to request you to add all_index option and usage_count option.
When all_index option is selected, all index become rewarm nevertheless user
doesn't input relation name. And usage_count
(2013/12/17 21:29), Simon Riggs wrote:
These are interesting results. Good research.
Thanks!
They also show that the benefit of this is very specific to the exact
task being performed. I can't see any future for a setting that
applies to everything or nothing. We must be more selective.
This
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
On 12/13/2013 07:55 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Dilip kumar dilip.ku...@huawei.com
wrote:
On 04 December 2013, Sawada Masahiko Wrote
I have modified the patch base on your
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:33 PM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
Few minor things:
event_source here is a global static char array, so it's automatically
initialized with zeros and safe to access.
Right, I had missed that point.
2. minor
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
Thanks, committed with some minor changes:
Should this patch in CF app be moved to Committed Patches or is there
something left for
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Sergey Muraviov
sergey.k.murav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I've improved the patch.
It works in expanded mode when either format option is set to wrapped (\pset
format wrapped), or we have no pager, or pager doesn't chop long lines (so
you can still use the
On 12/18/2013 01:03 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Gregory Smith gregsmithpg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/16/13 9:36 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
- Finish and commit updatable security barrier views. I've still got a
lot of straightening out to do there.
I don't
86 matches
Mail list logo