On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
On 06/14/2014 09:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Here's a new version, rebased against master. No other changes.
This is missing xlogrecord.h ...
Oops, here you are.
Looking at
Hello
I recheck this patch
1. applied cleanly and compilation was without warnings and errors
2. all tests was passed ok
3. documentation was rebuild without issues
4. I don't see any issue in code quality - it is well commented, well
formatted, with regress tests
It is ready for commit
On 06/27/2014 06:22 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com
mailto:vik.fear...@dalibo.com wrote:
On 06/26/2014 05:07 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
I think it will make sense if we support RESET ALL as well similar
to Alter Database .. RESET ALL
Hello
thank you Peter, so now only setting for MS Windows is missing?
Regards
Pavel
2014-06-26 21:57 GMT+02:00 Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com:
Hello,
I went through the patch, seems mostly fine, I adjusted some wording,
removed the default .pgpass file info since it's not accurate,
On 06/27/2014 08:49 AM, Vik Fearing wrote:
This third patch reformats the documentation in the way I expected it to
be committed.
Amit,
I added this to the next commitfest with your name as reviewer.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1495
Please update the status as you
On 26 June 2014 18:04, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
ALTER TABLE t1 SET POLICY p1 ON SELECT TO t1_p1_sel_quals;
GRANT SELECT ON TABLE t1 TO role1 USING p1;
As I see it, the downside of this is that it gets a lot more complex.
We have to revise the ACL representation, which is
On 2014-06-26 22:47:47 -0600, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi,
As part of a research project, I'm trying to change Read Committed isolation
to use HeapTupleSatisfiesNow rather than acquiring a new snapshot at every
command [1]. Things appear to have gone reasonably well so far, except
certain
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Hello, I have finished the patches for all of 9.x.
I dont' touch what '-n' option shows and rewrite documents for
the option a bit. And '-n' won't show the changes of backup
location.
-8.4: does not
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:01 PM, furu...@pm.nttdata.co.jp wrote:
The patch looks somewhat complicated and bugs can be easily introduced
because it tries to not only add new feature but also reorganize the main
loop in HandleCopyStream at the same time. To keep the patch simple, I'm
thinking
On 2014-06-05 19:13:34 +0900, furu...@pm.nttdata.co.jp wrote:
-Original Message-
Hi,
On 2014-06-05 17:09:44 +0900, furu...@pm.nttdata.co.jp wrote:
Synchronous(synchronous_commit = on) mode offers the ability to
confirm WAL have been streamed in the same way as synchronous
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
Why is IIT timeout turned on only when send_ready_for_query is true?
I was thinking it should be turned on every time a message is received.
Imagine the case where the session is in
On 2014-06-24 10:22:08 -0700, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-06-24 13:03:37 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
If a change has the potential to make some architectures give wrong
answers only at odd times, that's a different kind of problem. For
that reason,
On 06/19/2014 07:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Jov am...@amutu.com writes:
the doc say:
ALTER USER is now an alias for ALTER
ROLEhttp://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-alterrole.html
but alter user lack the following format:
...
If we're going to have a policy that these commands be
Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 26/06/2014 11:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Ryan Johnson wrote:
As part of a research project, I'm trying to change Read Committed
isolation to use HeapTupleSatisfiesNow rather than acquiring a new
snapshot at every command [1].
Are you aware of this?
commit
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here are rebased patches, their was a conflict with a recent commit in
contrib/pg_upgrade.
I am resending patch 2 as it contained a rebase conflict not correctly
resolved (Thanks Alvaro).
Regards,
--
Michael
On 27/06/2014 3:14 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-06-26 22:47:47 -0600, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi,
As part of a research project, I'm trying to change Read Committed isolation
to use HeapTupleSatisfiesNow rather than acquiring a new snapshot at every
command [1]. Things appear to have gone
On 2014-06-27 08:39:13 -0600, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 27/06/2014 3:14 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-06-26 22:47:47 -0600, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi,
As part of a research project, I'm trying to change Read Committed isolation
to use HeapTupleSatisfiesNow rather than acquiring a new snapshot
pgstat_heap() creates a BufferAccessStrategy and attaches it to a
HeapScanDesc. It continues to use that strategy after calling heap_endscan(),
which frees the strategy. This is only a risk when the table contains empty
pages at the end. I get a crash in an assert-enabled build with this test
On 27/06/2014 8:20 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 26/06/2014 11:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Ryan Johnson wrote:
As part of a research project, I'm trying to change Read Committed
isolation to use HeapTupleSatisfiesNow rather than acquiring a new
snapshot at every command
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
But a) isn't really avoidable because it'll otherwise generate compiler
warnings and b) is done that way all over the tree. E.g. lwlock.c has
several copies of (note the nonvolatility of proc):
volatile LWLock
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-06-26 14:13:07 -0700, Tom Lane wrote:
Surely it had better be a read barrier as well?
I don't immediately see why it has to be read barrier? Hoisting a load
from after the
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-06-24 10:22:08 -0700, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-06-24 13:03:37 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
If a change has the potential to make some architectures give wrong
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I don't really see usecases where it's not related data that's being
touched, but: The point is that the fastpath (not using a spinlock) might
touch the atomic variable, even while the slowpath has acquired the
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen a...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
At 2014-06-25 10:36:07 -0400, sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
To me, that's ridiculous on the face of it. Other databases have had
this kind of capability as a matter of course for decades- we are far
behind in this
On 2014-06-27 13:00:34 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
There are two separate issues here:
1. SpinLockAcquire and SpinLockRelease are not guaranteed to be
compiler barriers, so all relevant memory accesses in the critical
section need to be done using volatile pointers. Failing to do this
is an
On 2014-06-27 13:12:31 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I have noticed that most PostgreSQL committers seem for format their
commit messages so that paragraphs are separated by a blank line, but
you seem not to do that. I find that less readable.
I'll change that.
Since there seems to be
On 2014-06-27 13:04:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-06-26 14:13:07 -0700, Tom Lane wrote:
Surely it had better be a read barrier as well?
I don't immediately see why it
Robert,
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I agree with Stephen's statement that the audit configuration
shouldn't be managed in flat files. If somebody wants to do that in
an extension, fine, but I don't think we should commit anything into
our source tree that works that way.
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-06-27 13:12:31 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I don't personally object to dropping Alpha, but when this was
discussed back in October, Stefan did:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/52616373.10...@kaltenbrunner.cc
As an ex-packager I do not
On 2014-06-27 13:15:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I don't really see usecases where it's not related data that's being
touched, but: The point is that the fastpath (not using a spinlock) might
touch the atomic
Jeff Janes wrote:
This problem was initially fairly easy to reproduce, but since I
started adding instrumentation specifically to catch it, it has become
devilishly hard to reproduce.
I think my next step will be to also log each of the values which goes
into the complex if (...)
On 06/27/2014 08:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-06-27 13:12:31 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I don't personally object to dropping Alpha, but when this was
discussed back in October, Stefan did:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:51:32PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-06-27 13:12:31 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I don't personally object to dropping Alpha, but when this was
discussed back in October, Stefan did:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/52616373.10...@kaltenbrunner.cc
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 11:06:26AM -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
I've already said that I now think we should use the standard
CREATE TRIGGER syntax to specify the transition tables, and that
if we do that we
Hi,
Please see the following patches for implementing support
for and migrating to Tau in PostgreSQL.
Happy Tau Day Hacking
http://tauday.com/
Make sure to check out this shory story:
http://tauday.com/a-parable
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen (3):
Implement tau() function
backend: use M_TAU
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen asbj...@asbjorn.it
---
contrib/earthdistance/earthdistance.c | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/earthdistance/earthdistance.c
b/contrib/earthdistance/earthdistance.c
index 6bbebdf..432309c 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen asbj...@asbjorn.it
---
src/backend/utils/adt/float.c | 4 ++--
src/backend/utils/adt/geo_ops.c | 8 ++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/float.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/float.c
index 1278053..b0211f8
Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen asbj...@asbjorn.it
---
doc/src/sgml/func.sgml| 13 +
src/backend/utils/adt/float.c | 17 +++--
src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h | 2 ++
src/include/utils/builtins.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
=?UTF-8?q?Asbj=C3=B8rn=20Sloth=20T=C3=B8nnesen?= asbj...@asbjorn.it writes:
Please see the following patches for implementing support
for and migrating to Tau in PostgreSQL.
While I don't particularly object to adding a tau() function, the rest of
this seems like change for the sake of change.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:03:33PM -0700, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?q?Asbj=C3=B8rn=20Sloth=20T=C3=B8nnesen?= asbj...@asbjorn.it writes:
Please see the following patches for implementing support for and
migrating to Tau in PostgreSQL.
While I don't particularly object to adding a tau()
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
=?UTF-8?q?Asbj=C3=B8rn=20Sloth=20T=C3=B8nnesen?= asbj...@asbjorn.it writes:
Please see the following patches for implementing support
for and migrating to Tau in PostgreSQL.
While I don't particularly object to adding a tau()
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-06-27 13:04:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-06-26 14:13:07 -0700, Tom Lane wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-06-27 13:15:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I don't really see usecases where it's not related data that's being
touched, but: The
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com
wrote:
On 06/27/2014 08:49 AM, Vik Fearing wrote:
This third patch reformats the documentation in the way I expected it to
be committed.
Amit,
I added this to the next commitfest with your name as reviewer.
No issues, I
44 matches
Mail list logo
