Hi,
When we specify a value which exceeds valid range in Customized Options ,
its behavior is different from Parameter Interaction via Configuration File
behavior.
In case of Parameter Interaction via Configuration File, it finish with FATAL
error when it get threshold error.
But in Customized
Hi, this is revised version.
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
- Storage for new information
The new struct NameId stores an identifier which telling what it
logically is using the new enum NameIdTypes.
I think NameId is a bad name for this. My point is that NameId, as it
stands, might be
On 14 November 2014 20:37, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
On 11/12/14, 1:54 AM, David Rowley wrote:
We'd also need to add some infrastructure to merge aggregate states
together for this to work properly. This means that could also work for
avg() and stddev etc. For max() and
On 14 November 2014 07:37, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
On 11/12/14, 1:54 AM, David Rowley wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com
mailto:si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This plan type is widely used in reporting queries, so will hit the
On 14 November 2014 01:51, David Rowley dgrowle...@gmail.com wrote:
When I mentioned this, I didn't mean to appear to be placing a road block.I
was just bringing to the table the information that COUNT(*) + COUNT(*)
works ok for merging COUNT(*)'s sub totals, but AVG(n) + AVG(n) does not.
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
It's true that if the startup process dies we don't try to restart,
but it's also true that if the checkpointer dies we do try to restart.
I'm not sure why this specific situation
Hi,
pg_ctl stop does't work propley, if --slot option is specified when WAL is
flushed only it has switched.
These processes still continue even after the posmaster failed:pg_receivexlog,
walsender and logger.
How to reproduce:
1.Start PostgreSQL
2.Create slot
3.Specify --slot option to
Tom Lane wrote:
I was testing backwards compatibility of pg_dumpall just now, and was
somewhat astonished to notice the size of the output for the regression
database compared to what it was not too long ago:
-rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 4509135 Nov 13 16:19 dumpall.83
-rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl
On 14 November 2014 07:37, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
On 11/12/14, 1:54 AM, David Rowley wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com
mailto:si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This plan type is widely used in reporting queries, so will hit
On 14/11/14 00:46, Simon Riggs wrote:
Limit (cost= rows=20 width=175) (actual time= rows=20 loops=1)
- Sort (cost= rows=568733 width=175) (actual time=
rows=20 loops=1)
Sort Method: top-N heapsort
Going off on a tangent, when I was playing with a merge-sort
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 12 November 2014 00:54, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Interestingly, I have a fairly solid idea of what proisparallel is,
but I have no clear idea what CONTAINS NO SQL is or why it's relevant.
I would
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 08:24:36PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
Agreed. I'll take care of both and we'll make sure the new role
attributes being added will do the same for upgrades also.
That would make
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:35:25AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 08:24:36PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
Agreed. I'll take care of both and we'll make sure the new role
attributes being
furu...@pm.nttdata.co.jp writes:
When we specify a value which exceeds valid range in Customized Options ,
its behavior is different from Parameter Interaction via Configuration File
behavior.
In case of Parameter Interaction via Configuration File, it finish with
FATAL error when it get
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 11/13/14 5:07 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 13 November 2014 00:20, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
Isn't the real use-case here that if constraints were valid when you dumped
then we shouldn't have to *any* re-validate when we load? (Though, we'd
have
Jeremy Harris j...@wizmail.org writes:
On 14/11/14 00:46, Simon Riggs wrote:
Limit (cost= rows=20 width=175) (actual time= rows=20 loops=1)
- Sort (cost= rows=568733 width=175) (actual time=
rows=20 loops=1)
Sort Method: top-N heapsort
Going off on a tangent, when I was
On 2014-11-14 02:04:00 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 11/13/14, 3:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Having been responsible for a site where downtime was a 6 figure
dollar amount per hour, I've spent a LOT of time worrying about lock
problems. The really big issue here isn't grabbing an exclusive lock;
* Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:35:25AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
Personally, I'm leaning towards the first as it's less clutter in the
output of psql.
I'd agree for a new design, but I see too little to gain from changing it now.
Today's behavior is
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
I'd agree for a new design, but I see too little to gain from changing it
now.
Today's behavior is fine.
To clarify- you mean with the changes described- using usesuper for
rolreplication and rolbypassrls
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
I'd agree for a new design, but I see too little to gain from changing it
now.
Today's behavior is fine.
To clarify- you mean with the changes
On 2014-11-13 11:41:18 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
But I think it won't work realistically. We have a *lot* of
infrastructure that refers to indexes using it's primary key. I don't
think we want to touch all those
* Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
I'd agree for a new design, but I see too little to gain from changing
it now.
Today's behavior is
Hi,
On 2014-11-13 15:59:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Discussion of my incomplete group locking patch seems to have
converged around two points: (1) Everybody agrees that undetected
deadlocks are unacceptable. (2) Nobody agrees with my proposal to
treat locks held by group members as mutually
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 13 November 2014 21:24, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Ordering transactions in LSN order is very precisly the remit of the
existing
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
What's bothering me is that I see this in pg_dumpall output from a 9.4
or earlier database:
ALTER ROLE postgres WITH SUPERUSER INHERIT CREATEROLE CREATEDB LOGIN
REPLICATION NOBYPASSRLS;
What about leaving out NOBYPASSRLS
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have mentioned that this can be usable for Linux users as
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Right. And that's why it's cool that logical decoding can operate
through DDL differences. The apply side might not be able to cope
with what pops out, but that's not logical decoding's fault, and
different
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
OTOH, if that is okay, then I think we can avoid few #ifdef WIN32 that
this patch introduces and can have consistency for this operation on
both linux and Windows.
Having one
On 2014-11-14 12:38:52 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
This is basically the same problem as multi-master replication
conflicts, except with DDL. Resolving replication conflicts is not a
very easy thing to get right even if you're only concerned about the
rows in the tables. It's probably
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:22 PM, furu...@pm.nttdata.co.jp wrote:
Hi,
pg_ctl stop does't work propley, if --slot option is specified when WAL is
flushed only it has switched.
These processes still continue even after the posmaster
failed:pg_receivexlog, walsender and logger.
I could
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Generally I'd be in favor of avoiding platform-dependent code where
possible, but that doesn't represent a YES vote for this particular
patch. It looks pretty messy in a quick look, even granting that the
#ifdef WIN32's would
Amit Kapila wrote:
2. Symlink file format:
oid linkpath
16387 E:\PostgreSQL\tbs
Symlink file will contain entries for all the tablspaces
under pg_tblspc directory. I have kept the file name as
symlink_label (suggestion are welcome if you want some
different name for this file).
I think
On 2014-11-15 03:25:16 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:22 PM, furu...@pm.nttdata.co.jp wrote:
Hi,
pg_ctl stop does't work propley, if --slot option is specified when WAL
is flushed only it has switched.
These processes still continue even after the posmaster
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
I was testing backwards compatibility of pg_dumpall just now, and was
somewhat astonished to notice the size of the output for the regression
database compared to what it was not too long ago:
-rw-rw-r--. 1 tgl tgl 4509135 Nov 13 16:19 dumpall.83
On 14 November 2014 20:57, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Is anyone going to submit a new version of this patch?
Hi Alvaro,
due to family issues I will not be able to work on it for the next 10 days.
regards,
Szymon
On 11/7/14, 1:19 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
Am Montag, den 27.10.2014, 19:29 + schrieb Thom Brown:
On 27 October 2014 19:21, Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com wrote:
I just realized that there is one thing we can't log currently:
transactions which last more than #ms. This is valuable
On 14/11/14 14:54, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeremy Harris j...@wizmail.org writes:
On 14/11/14 00:46, Simon Riggs wrote:
Limit (cost= rows=20 width=175) (actual time= rows=20 loops=1)
- Sort (cost= rows=568733 width=175) (actual time=
rows=20 loops=1)
Sort Method: top-N heapsort
Michael Paquier wrote:
Hi all,
The new storage parameter pages_per_range is missing in the
documentation of CREATE INDEX. The patch attached corrects that.
Thanks! Pushed.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
On 11/13/14 4:33 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Is this still relevant after this commit?
commit fb05f3ce83d225dd0f39f8860ce04082753e9e98
Author: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
Date: Sat Feb 22 13:38:06 2014 -0500
pg_basebackup: Add support for relocating tablespaces
I believe
Hello Hackers,
After reading up through archives on the two $subj related TODO items
I'm under impression that the patches[1,2] didn't make it mainly because
of the risk of breaking SSL internals if we try to longjump out of the
signal handler in the middle of a blocking SSL read and/or if we try
Hi,
On 2014-11-15 00:11:36 +0300, Alex Shulgin wrote:
After reading up through archives on the two $subj related TODO items
I'm under impression that the patches[1,2] didn't make it mainly because
of the risk of breaking SSL internals if we try to longjump out of the
signal handler in the
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-11-15 00:11:36 +0300, Alex Shulgin wrote:
After reading up through archives on the two $subj related TODO items
I'm under impression that the patches[1,2] didn't make it mainly because
of the risk of breaking SSL internals if we try to
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
What's bothering me is that I see this in pg_dumpall output from a 9.4
or earlier database:
ALTER ROLE
All,
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
Well, if you *only* move RowSecurityDesc and not RowSecurityPolicy,
okay, but that seems a bit useless/inconsistent if I'm reading it
right that RowSecurityDesc contains a List of RowSecurityPolicy
On 2014-10-30 14:30:28 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
Here's a proposed patch to initdb to make initdb -S fsync everything
under pg_tblspc. It introduces a new function that calls walkdir on
every entry under pg_tblspc. This is only one approach: I could have
also changed walkdir to follow
On 2014-10-27 16:09:30 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2014-09-25 22:41:18 +0200, and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-09-24 17:06:05 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
1. Move the call to ResetUnloggedRelations(UNLOGGED_RELATION_INIT) to
earlier in StartupXLOG.
2. Inside
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:47:49AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I think Noah is arguing for leaving the pg_dumpall queries as they
stand. I disagree, but he's entitled to his opinion.
Ah, ok. I'm impartial, but I do note that
On 14 November 2014 17:12, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
We are not talking about loading 20 new
requirements on top of this patch; that would be intolerable. We're
talking about adding one additional piece of information that has been
requested multiple times over the years.
The
It looks like commit 0e99be1c removed the final real use of the struct
InhPaths. Attached patch removes it entirely.
--
Peter Geoghegan
diff --git a/src/include/parser/parse_func.h b/src/include/parser/parse_func.h
index b9b06ae..4423bc0 100644
--- a/src/include/parser/parse_func.h
+++
* Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:47:49AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
rolcreaterole uses usesuper, while rolreplication and rolbypassrls do
not. Noah- would you argue that we should change rolcreaterole, which
has this behavior in all released branches
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:39:28PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
So, if you desire to make this consistent, I recommend using
rolreplication's
treatment as the gold standard. That is to say, when dumping from an older
version, set to false any of
* Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:39:28PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
I don't see the point in including them for --clean..? --clean states
that DROP commands would be added, not that existing roles would be
adjusted in some way.
It does state that, but
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On 11/13/14 4:33 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Is this still relevant after this commit?
commit fb05f3ce83d225dd0f39f8860ce04082753e9e98
Author: Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
Date: Sat Feb 22 13:38:06 2014
Michael Paquier wrote:
Btw, perhaps this diff should be pushed as a different patch as this is a
rather different thing:
- if (heapRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED
+ if (indexRelation-rd_rel-relpersistence ==
RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED
Michael Paquier wrote:
Hi all,
The new storage parameter pages_per_range is missing in the
documentation of CREATE INDEX. The patch attached corrects that.
Ah BTW I had pushed this earlier today.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
It looks like commit 0e99be1c removed the final real use of the struct
InhPaths. Attached patch removes it entirely.
I didn't verify the claim about 0e99be1c, but I pushed it anyway.
Thanks.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL
On 11/14/2014 08:21 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
The requested information is already available, as discussed. Logical
decoding adds commit ordering for *exactly* the purpose of using it
for replication, available to all solutions. This often requested
feature has now been added and doesn't need to be
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Michael Paquier wrote:
Hi all,
The new storage parameter pages_per_range is missing in the
documentation of CREATE INDEX. The patch attached corrects that.
Ah BTW I had pushed this earlier today.
Thanks.
--
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
3) pg_xlogdump does not seem to work:
$ pg_xlogdump 0001000D
pg_xlogdump: FATAL: could not find a valid record after 0/D00
This one is a bad manipulation from my side. Please forget this
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Amit Kapila wrote:
2. Symlink file format:
oid linkpath
16387 E:\PostgreSQL\tbs
Symlink file will contain entries for all the tablspaces
under pg_tblspc directory. I have kept the file name as
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Generally I'd be in favor of avoiding platform-dependent code where
possible, but that doesn't represent a YES vote for this particular
patch. It
61 matches
Mail list logo
